Hussain Z, Stoakes L, Stevens D L, Schieven B C, Lannigan R, Jones C
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):126-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.126-128.1986.
To evaluate the accuracy of the MicroScan System (American Hospital Supply Corp., Sacramento, Calif.) for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci, we tested 175 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. The results obtained by the MicroScan system were compared with those of the API Staph-Ident system (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.). Forty-three discrepancies between the two systems were resolved by the conventional method of Kloos and Schleifer (W.E. Kloos and K.H. Schleifer, J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:82-88, 1975). The MicroScan and the Staph-Ident systems correctly identified 146 (86.4%) and 154 (88%) of 175 strains, respectively. The API system failed to identify phosphatase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis. The MicroScan system demonstrated the greatest accuracy in the identification of S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus, whereas lesser accuracy was achieved with S. hominis, S. warneri, and S. sciuri.
为评估MicroScan系统(美国医院供应公司,加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托)鉴定凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的准确性,我们检测了175株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的临床分离株。将MicroScan系统获得的结果与API葡萄球菌鉴定系统(Analytab Products公司,纽约州普莱恩维尤)的结果进行比较。通过Kloos和Schleifer的传统方法(W.E. Kloos和K.H. Schleifer,《临床微生物学杂志》1:82 - 88,1975年)解决了两个系统之间的43个差异。MicroScan系统和葡萄球菌鉴定系统分别正确鉴定了175株菌株中的146株(86.4%)和154株(88%)。API系统未能鉴定出磷酸酶阴性的表皮葡萄球菌。MicroScan系统在鉴定表皮葡萄球菌和腐生葡萄球菌方面显示出最高的准确性,而在鉴定人葡萄球菌、沃氏葡萄球菌和松鼠葡萄球菌方面准确性较低。