Cunningham Anthony, McAdam Kevin, Thissen Jesse, Digard Helena
British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited, Research and Development, Southampton, United Kingdom.
McAdam Scientific Ltd., Eastleigh, United Kingdom.
Front Toxicol. 2020 Dec 15;2:586674. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2020.586674. eCollection 2020.
E-cigarette designs, materials, and ingredients are continually evolving, with cotton wicks and diverse coil materials emerging as the popular components of atomisers. Another recent development is the use of nicotine salts in e-liquids to replicate the form of nicotine found in cigarette smoke, which may help cigarette smokers to transition to e-cigarettes. However, scientific understanding of the impact of such innovations on e-cigarette aerosol chemistry is limited. To address these knowledge gaps, we have conducted a comparative study analyzing relevant toxicant emissions from five e-cigarettes varying in wick, atomiser coil, and benzoic acid content and two tobacco cigarettes, quantifying 97 aerosol constituents and 84 smoke compounds, respectively. Our focus was the potential for benzoic acid in e-liquids and cotton wicks to form aerosol toxicants through thermal degradation reactions, and the potential for nickel-iron alloy coils to catalyze degradation of aerosol formers. In addition, we analyzed e-cigarette emissions for 19 flavor compounds, thermal decomposition products, and e-liquid contaminants that the FDA has recently proposed adding to the established list of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) in tobacco products. Analyses for benzene and phenol showed no evidence of the thermal decomposition of benzoic acid in the e-cigarettes tested. Measurements of cotton decomposition products, such as carbonyls, hydrocarbons, aromatics, and PAHs, further indicated that cotton wicks can be used without thermal degradation in suitable e-cigarette designs. No evidence was found for enhanced thermal decomposition of propylene glycol or glycerol by the nickel-iron coil. Sixteen of the 19 FDA-proposed compounds were not detected in the e-cigarettes. Comparing toxicant emissions from e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes showed that levels of the nine WHO TobReg priority cigarette smoke toxicants were more than 99% lower in the aerosols from each of five e-cigarettes as compared with the commercial and reference cigarettes. Despite continuing evolution in design, components and ingredients, e-cigarettes continue to offer significantly lower toxicant exposure alternatives to cigarette smoking.
电子烟的设计、材料和成分在不断演变,棉芯和多种线圈材料成为雾化器的流行组件。最近的另一项发展是在电子烟液中使用尼古丁盐,以复制香烟烟雾中发现的尼古丁形式,这可能有助于吸烟者转向使用电子烟。然而,对于此类创新对电子烟气溶胶化学影响的科学理解有限。为了填补这些知识空白,我们进行了一项比较研究,分析了五款在棉芯、雾化器线圈和苯甲酸含量方面存在差异的电子烟以及两款卷烟的相关有毒物质排放情况,分别对97种气溶胶成分和84种烟雾化合物进行了量化。我们关注的是电子烟液和棉芯中的苯甲酸通过热降解反应形成气溶胶有毒物质的可能性,以及镍铁合金线圈催化气溶胶形成剂降解的可能性。此外,我们分析了电子烟排放的19种香料化合物、热分解产物和电子烟液污染物,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)最近提议将这些物质添加到烟草制品既定的有害和潜在有害成分(HPHC)清单中。对苯和苯酚的分析表明,在所测试的电子烟中没有证据显示苯甲酸发生了热分解。对棉芯分解产物(如羰基化合物、碳氢化合物、芳烃和多环芳烃)的测量进一步表明,在合适的电子烟设计中,棉芯可以在不发生热降解的情况下使用。没有发现镍铁线圈会增强丙二醇或甘油热分解的证据。在电子烟中未检测到FDA提议的19种化合物中的16种。比较电子烟和卷烟的有毒物质排放情况表明,与商业卷烟和参比卷烟相比,五款电子烟中的每一款产生的气溶胶中,世界卫生组织烟草管制优先关注的九种卷烟烟雾有毒物质的含量都降低了99%以上。尽管电子烟在设计、组件和成分方面不断演变,但与吸烟相比,电子烟仍然提供了毒性暴露显著更低的替代选择。