• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有分歧?欧洲各国政府在 COVID-19 期间如何决定公共卫生限制措施。

At odds? How European governments decided on public health restrictions during COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Politics and International Relations, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, UK.

Department of Economics and Law, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.001
PMID:35299082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8843335/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to understand how politics, economics, and public health restrictions affected each other during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We use seemingly unrelated regressions on a monthly data set of government approval ratings, the stringency index, the time-dependent reproduction number (R), and unemployment, allowing the residuals in each regression to be correlated with each other. We also conduct sensitivity tests using weekly data and the growth in polls.

RESULTS

The study covers 27 European countries from April 2020 to April 2021. A unit increase in the R and COVID-19 cases per million increases the stringency index by 23.742 and 4.207, respectively; a unit increase in stringency boosts the incumbent's popularity by 0.384; the poll positively affects the stringency index; stringency has negative effects on the R; and the poll and stringency index have opposite effects on unemployment.

CONCLUSION

Political and economic pressures did not hinder the government from introducing stronger measures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在了解在 COVID-19 大流行期间,政治、经济和公共卫生限制是如何相互影响的。

方法

我们使用每月数据集中的政府支持率、严格指数、时变繁殖数(R)和失业率进行似乎不相关的回归,允许每个回归中的残差相互关联。我们还使用每周数据和民意调查的增长进行敏感性测试。

结果

本研究涵盖了 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 4 月的 27 个欧洲国家。R 和每百万例 COVID-19 病例的单位增加分别使严格指数增加 23.742 和 4.207;严格指数的增加使现任者的支持率提高 0.384;民意调查对严格指数有积极影响;严格指数对 R 有负面影响;民意调查和严格指数对失业率有相反的影响。

结论

政治和经济压力并没有阻碍政府采取更强有力的措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e7/8843335/b0892b70c2d6/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e7/8843335/a1f508c8d147/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e7/8843335/b0892b70c2d6/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e7/8843335/a1f508c8d147/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68e7/8843335/b0892b70c2d6/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
At odds? How European governments decided on public health restrictions during COVID-19.有分歧?欧洲各国政府在 COVID-19 期间如何决定公共卫生限制措施。
Public Health. 2022 Apr;205:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
The 40 health systems, COVID-19 (40HS, C-19) study.40 个卫生系统应对 COVID-19 研究(40HS,C-19 研究)。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 20;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa113.
3
COVID-19 in conflict region: the arab levant response.新冠疫情在冲突地区:阿拉伯黎凡特的应对。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;21(1):1590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11580-4.
4
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
5
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
What factors drive the satisfaction of citizens with governments' responses to COVID-19?哪些因素驱动公民对政府应对 COVID-19 措施的满意度?
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
7
Face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: how risk perception, experience with COVID-19, and attitude towards government interact with country-wide policy stringency.在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用口罩:风险认知、COVID-19 体验和对政府态度如何与全国性政策严格程度相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;22(1):1622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13632-9.
8
The Effect of Governmental Health Measures on Public Behaviour During the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak.政府卫生措施对 COVID-19 疫情期间公众行为的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2166-2174. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.131. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
9
Utility of the Comprehensive Health and Stringency Indexes in Evaluating Government Responses for Containing the Spread of COVID-19 in India: Ecological Time-Series Study.综合健康与严格指数在评估印度政府控制新冠疫情传播措施中的效用:生态时间序列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 10;9:e38371. doi: 10.2196/38371.
10
Political stringency, infection rates, and higher education students' adherence to government measures in the Nordic countries and the UK during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情第一波期间北欧国家和英国的政治严厉程度、感染率与高等教育学生对政府措施的遵守情况
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107245. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107245. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 30 European countries: the ECDC-JRC Response Measures Database.针对 30 个欧洲国家 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:ECDC-JRC 应对措施数据库。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Oct;27(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.41.2101190.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequality, fiscal policy and COVID19 restrictions in a demand-determined economy.需求决定型经济中的不平等、财政政策与新冠疫情限制措施
Eur Econ Rev. 2021 Aug;137:103810. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103810. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
2
Government responses and COVID-19 deaths: Global evidence across multiple pandemic waves.政府应对措施与 COVID-19 死亡人数:多次大流行浪潮中的全球证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253116. eCollection 2021.
3
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19.关于2019冠状病毒病经济学的文献综述。
J Econ Surv. 2021 Sep;35(4):1007-1044. doi: 10.1111/joes.12423. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
4
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Tracking [Formula: see text] of COVID-19: A new real-time estimation using the Kalman filter.追踪 COVID-19 [公式:见正文]:一种新的基于卡尔曼滤波的实时估计方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0244474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244474. eCollection 2021.
6
Is science ever enough? Dare to play politics.科学就足够了吗?敢于玩弄政治手段。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32551-4. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Care: How the Pandemic Is Delaying Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment for American Seniors.新冠疫情对癌症治疗的影响:大流行如何推迟美国老年人的癌症诊断与治疗
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Nov;4:1059-1071. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00134.
8
Offline: COVID-19-a crisis of power.线下:新冠疫情——一场权力危机。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32262-5.
9
Effectiveness of Penalties for Lockdown Violations During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.德国新冠疫情期间违反封锁规定的处罚效果
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1844-1849. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305903. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Dying in a Leadership Vacuum.在领导力真空状态下走向灭亡。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1479-1480. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2029812.