Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Commun Biol. 2022 Mar 18;5(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03197-z.
A growing body of evidence suggests that, during decision-making, BOLD signal in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) correlates both with motivational variables - such as incentives and expected values - and metacognitive variables - such as confidence judgments - which reflect the subjective probability of being correct. At the behavioral level, we recently demonstrated that the value of monetary stakes bias confidence judgments, with gain (respectively loss) prospects increasing (respectively decreasing) confidence judgments, even for similar levels of difficulty and performance. If and how this value-confidence interaction is reflected in the VMPFC remains unknown. Here, we used an incentivized perceptual decision-making fMRI task that dissociates key decision-making variables, thereby allowing to test several hypotheses about the role of the VMPFC in the value-confidence interaction. While our initial analyses seemingly indicate that the VMPFC combines incentives and confidence to form an expected value signal, we falsified this conclusion with a meticulous dissection of qualitative activation patterns. Rather, our results show that strong VMPFC confidence signals observed in trials with gain prospects are disrupted in trials with no - or negative (loss) - monetary prospects. Deciphering how decision variables are represented and interact at finer scales seems necessary to better understand biased (meta)cognition.
越来越多的证据表明,在决策过程中,腹内侧前额叶皮层(VMPFC)中的 BOLD 信号与动机变量(如激励和预期值)以及元认知变量(如置信判断)相关,这些变量反映了正确的主观概率。在行为水平上,我们最近证明,货币赌注的价值会影响置信判断,收益(分别是损失)的可能性会增加(分别是减少)置信判断,即使对于相似难度和表现水平。如果以及这种价值-置信度的相互作用在 VMPFC 中是如何反映的仍然未知。在这里,我们使用了一个有激励的感知决策 fMRI 任务,该任务可以分离关键决策变量,从而可以测试关于 VMPFC 在价值-置信度相互作用中的作用的几个假设。虽然我们的初步分析似乎表明 VMPFC 将激励和置信度结合起来形成预期价值信号,但我们通过对定性激活模式的细致剖析否定了这一结论。相反,我们的结果表明,在有收益前景的试验中观察到的 VMPFC 强烈的置信信号在没有货币前景(或负收益(损失))的试验中被打乱。为了更好地理解有偏差的(元)认知,需要更细致地解析决策变量是如何在更精细的尺度上被表示和相互作用的。