• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CO-RADS 对疑似 2019 冠状病毒病患者的诊断准确性:单中心经验。

Diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS in patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease-2019: A single center experience.

机构信息

Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil.

Brazilian Redcross - Parana Chapter, Vicente Machado, 1310, Curitiba, Parana 80420-011, Brazil; Federal University of Parana, Department of Radiology, Internal Medicine Branch, R. General Carneiro, 181, Curitiba, PR 80060-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2022 Jun;86:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.005
PMID:35306311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8851875/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) is a tool for standardizing the reports of patients with suspected or confirmed Sars-CoV-2 infection. We performed a study of the performance of the CO-RADS in a triage scenario of patients in Brazil.

METHODS

Data from 426 Computed Tomography (CT) scans from March 2020 through December 2020 were assessed in an ambidirectional, both retrospective and prospective, for the assessment in one of the six categories of the CO-RADS. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) Youden's index, Positive and Negative Clinical Utility Index (UC + and UC- respectively) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). We also plotted Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve with Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CO-RADS of >4 (4 + 5).

RESULTS

For CO-RADS classification > 4 (4 + 5) considered positive, the AUC obtained was of 0.89 (95% CI of 0.02), sensitivity of 78% (95% CI of 0.3), specificity of 91% (95% CI of 0.3), PPV of 0.92 (95% CI of 0.02), NPV of 0.41 (95% CI of 0.03), PLR of 0.85 (95% CI of 0.2), and NLR of 0.23 (95% CI of 0.02).

CONCLUSION

CO-RADS demonstrated overall good diagnostic performance in stratifying patients with suspected Sars-CoV-2 infection, even those without confirmed laboratorial diagnosis, therefore being useful in a triage scenario with lack of resources.

摘要

简介

COVID-19 报告和数据系统(CO-RADS)是一种用于规范疑似或确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者报告的工具。我们对巴西分诊场景中的患者进行了 CO-RADS 表现的研究。

方法

在回顾性和前瞻性双向评估中,对 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的 426 例 CT 扫描数据进行评估,以评估 CO-RADS 的六个类别之一。我们评估了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、Youden 指数、阳性和阴性临床实用指数(UC+和 UC-)和诊断优势比(DOR)。我们还绘制了 CO-RADS >4(4+5)的接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线及其曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

对于 CO-RADS 分类>4(4+5)考虑为阳性,获得的 AUC 为 0.89(95%CI 为 0.02),敏感性为 78%(95%CI 为 0.3),特异性为 91%(95%CI 为 0.3),PPV 为 0.92(95%CI 为 0.02),NPV 为 0.41(95%CI 为 0.03),PLR 为 0.85(95%CI 为 0.2),NLR 为 0.23(95%CI 为 0.02)。

结论

CO-RADS 在分层疑似 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者方面表现出总体良好的诊断性能,即使是那些没有确诊实验室诊断的患者,因此在资源不足的分诊场景中很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/9c3179f34c98/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/7f0564fe03e5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/15624a071b27/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/7e2693c72830/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/0378c3d22bf2/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/9c3179f34c98/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/7f0564fe03e5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/15624a071b27/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/7e2693c72830/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/0378c3d22bf2/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da7/8851875/9c3179f34c98/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS in patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease-2019: A single center experience.CO-RADS 对疑似 2019 冠状病毒病患者的诊断准确性:单中心经验。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Jun;86:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Chest CT for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Individuals with or without COVID-19 Symptoms.胸部 CT 对有或无症状 COVID-19 患者 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E30-E37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202708. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
Diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement with the CO-RADS lexicon for CT chest reporting in COVID-19.CO-RADS 词汇在 COVID-19 胸部 CT 报告中的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):1045-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01967-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of CO-RADS in patients with suspected coronavirus disease-2019: a multireader validation study.CO-RADS 在疑似 2019 冠状病毒病患者中的诊断准确性和观察者间变异性:一项多读者验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1932-1940. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07273-y. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Chest CT in COVID-19 at the ED: Validation of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT Severity Score: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.急诊科 COVID-19 的胸部 CT:COVID-19 报告和数据系统 (CO-RADS) 和 CT 严重程度评分的验证:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1126-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.026. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Chest CT diagnostic potential as a tool for early detection of suspected COVID-19 cases in pandemic peaks.胸部 CT 诊断潜力可作为大流行高峰期疑似 COVID-19 病例早期检测的工具。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2023 Feb 28;65(1):99-110. doi: 10.3897/folmed.65.e71406.
7
Radiographers and COVID-19 pneumonia: Diagnostic performance using CO-RADS.放射技师和 COVID-19 肺炎:使用 CO-RADS 的诊断性能。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Nov;27(4):1078-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Chest CT in the Emergency Department for Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia: Dutch Experience.急诊科胸部 CT 诊断 COVID-19 肺炎:荷兰经验。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):E98-E106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203465. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Chest CT for triage during COVID-19 on the emergency department: myth or truth?急诊科在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间使用胸部CT进行分诊:是神话还是事实?
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(6):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01821-1. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
Applicability of CO-RADS in an Anonymized Cohort Including Early and Advanced Stages of COVID-19 in Comparison to the Recommendations of the German Radiological Society and Radiological Society of North America.CO-RADS 在包括 COVID-19 早期和晚期阶段的匿名队列中的适用性与德国放射学会和北美放射学会建议的比较。
Rofo. 2022 Aug;194(8):862-872. doi: 10.1055/a-1740-4310. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of standardized typical CT findings for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19标准化典型CT表现的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Insights Imaging. 2023 May 24;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01429-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of CO-RADS and the RSNA Classification System in Evaluating COVID-19 at Chest CT: A Meta-Analysis.CO-RADS和RSNA分类系统在胸部CT评估新型冠状病毒肺炎中的诊断效能:一项Meta分析
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021 Jan 14;3(1):e200510. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200510. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Comparison of Chest CT Grading Systems in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎胸部CT分级系统的比较
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Nov 5;2(6):e200492. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200492. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
A head-to-head comparison of the intra- and interobserver agreement of COVID-RADS and CO-RADS grading systems in a population with high estimated prevalence of COVID-19.
在新冠肺炎估计患病率较高的人群中,对COVID-RADS和CO-RADS分级系统的观察者内和观察者间一致性进行的直接比较。
BJR Open. 2020 Dec 11;2(1):20200053. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20200053. eCollection 2020.
4
Chest CT in COVID-19 at the ED: Validation of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and CT Severity Score: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.急诊科 COVID-19 的胸部 CT:COVID-19 报告和数据系统 (CO-RADS) 和 CT 严重程度评分的验证:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1126-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.026. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Chest CT in COVID-19: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.COVID-19 的胸部 CT:放射科医生需要了解的知识。
Radiographics. 2020 Nov-Dec;40(7):1848-1865. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200159. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Role of computed tomography in COVID-19.计算机断层扫描在 COVID-19 中的作用。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Jan-Feb;15(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
7
Evaluation of the Usefulness of CO-RADS for Chest CT in Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19.CO-RADS在疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎患者胸部CT中的应用价值评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 19;10(9):608. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090608.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Chest CT for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Individuals with or without COVID-19 Symptoms.胸部 CT 对有或无症状 COVID-19 患者 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断性能。
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E30-E37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202708. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的病理生理学、传播、诊断和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.
10
Review of the Chest CT Differential Diagnosis of Ground-Glass Opacities in the COVID Era.COVID 时代肺部磨玻璃密度影的 CT 鉴别诊断综述
Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):E289-E302. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202504. Epub 2020 Jul 7.