Cuevas Adolfo G, Goler Evan, Guetta Claudia J, Krueger Robert F
Department of Community Health, Tufts University, United States.
Department of Community Health, Tufts University, United States.
Brain Behav Immun. 2022 May;102:333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
Socioeconomic status (SES) and discrimination have been implicated as social determinants of health and health disparities. Yet, very little research has been done to assess their contributing role in Black-White disparities in inflammation. Using data from the Midlife in the United States (2004-2006), we conducted Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis to quantify the extent to which three indicators of SES (i.e., education, household income, and employment status) and three forms of discrimination exposures (i.e., everyday, lifetime, and workplace discrimination) explained Black-White differences in inflammation. Education, particularly having a college degree or more, explained 16.88% of the differences between Blacks and Whites. There was no evidence that household income and employment status explained Black-White inflammation differences. Lifetime discrimination significantly explained 18.18% of Black-White difference in inflammation burden. There was no evidence that everyday and workplace discrimination explained Black-White difference in inflammation burden. Together, the predictors explained 44.16% of inflammation differences between Black and White participants. Education and lifetime exposure to discrimination may play a role in inflammation disparities. Further research is needed to examine other dimensions of SES (e.g., wealth) and discrimination (e.g., racial segregation) that are associated with health to better understand the contributions of these key social determinants of Black-White inflammation disparities.
社会经济地位(SES)和歧视被认为是健康及健康差异的社会决定因素。然而,很少有研究评估它们在黑人和白人炎症差异中所起的作用。利用美国中年(2004 - 2006年)的数据,我们进行了奥瓦卡 - 布林德分解分析,以量化社会经济地位的三个指标(即教育程度、家庭收入和就业状况)以及三种形式的歧视暴露(即日常歧视、终身歧视和职场歧视)对黑人和白人炎症差异的解释程度。教育,尤其是拥有大学学位或更高学历,解释了黑人和白人之间16.88%的差异。没有证据表明家庭收入和就业状况能解释黑人和白人的炎症差异。终身歧视显著解释了黑人和白人炎症负担差异的18.18%。没有证据表明日常歧视和职场歧视能解释黑人和白人的炎症负担差异。这些预测因素共同解释了黑人和白人参与者之间44.16%的炎症差异。教育和终身遭受歧视可能在炎症差异中起作用。需要进一步研究来考察社会经济地位的其他维度(如财富)和歧视的其他维度(如种族隔离)与健康的关联,以便更好地理解这些关键社会决定因素对黑人和白人炎症差异的影响。