Roberts Morgan, Thygerson Steven M, Beard John D, Clark Camille, Montague Emma
Department of Public Health Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA.
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 14;5(2):e539. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.539. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in 2019 with several unknown factors. The World Health Organization (WHO) subsequently developed COVID-19 occupational safety and health (OSH) guidelines to reduce occupational COVID-19 transmission. Many countries also developed their own COVID-19 OSH guidelines, but whether these guidelines included WHO's guidelines and whether including WHO's guidelines in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines reduced COVID-19 transmission is unknown.
The objectives of our study were to (1) compare the COVID-19 OSH guidelines of several countries to WHO's OSH guidelines, (2) estimate associations between characteristics of countries and their OSH guidelines and the number of WHO's OSH guidelines included in countries' OSH guidelines, and (3) estimate associations between WHO's OSH guidelines included in countries' OSH guidelines and COVID-19 risk, death risk, and case-fatality proportion.
This study represents international, ecological research of 36 countries from all six world health regions. Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines were compared with WHO's OSH guidelines. Linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate associations of interest.
The median number of WHO's 15 COVID-19 OSH guidelines included in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines was eight. Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines focused on workers included significantly more of WHO's COVID-19 OSH guidelines than countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines focused on general populations. Including "provide personal protective equipment for workers" and "create workplace policy for wearing personal protective equipment" in countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines were significantly related to decreased COVID-19 risk, death risk, and/or case-fatality proportion.
Countries' COVID-19 OSH guidelines should include WHO's guidelines, focus on workers, and include "provide personal protective equipment for workers" and "create workplace policy for wearing personal protective equipment."
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)始于2019年,存在若干未知因素。世界卫生组织(WHO)随后制定了COVID-19职业安全与健康(OSH)指南,以减少COVID-19的职业传播。许多国家也制定了各自的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南,但这些指南是否包含WHO的指南,以及在各国的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南中纳入WHO的指南是否能减少COVID-19传播尚不清楚。
我们研究的目的是:(1)比较几个国家的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南与WHO的职业安全与健康指南;(2)估计国家特征及其职业安全与健康指南与各国职业安全与健康指南中包含的WHO职业安全与健康指南数量之间的关联;(3)估计各国职业安全与健康指南中包含的WHO职业安全与健康指南与COVID-19风险、死亡风险和病死率之间的关联。
本研究为来自世界六大卫生区域的36个国家的国际生态研究。将各国的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南与WHO的职业安全与健康指南进行比较。使用针对潜在混杂因素进行调整的线性回归模型来估计感兴趣的关联。
各国COVID-19职业安全与健康指南中包含的WHO的15条COVID-19职业安全与健康指南的中位数为8条。与针对普通人群的各国COVID-19职业安全与健康指南相比,针对工人的各国COVID-19职业安全与健康指南包含的WHO的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南明显更多。在各国的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南中纳入“为工人提供个人防护装备”和“制定佩戴个人防护装备的工作场所政策”与降低COVID-19风险、死亡风险和/或病死率显著相关。
各国的COVID-19职业安全与健康指南应包含WHO的指南,关注工人,并纳入“为工人提供个人防护装备”和“制定佩戴个人防护装备的工作场所政策”。