Bardhan K D, Bianchi Porro G, Bose K, Daly M, Hinchliffe R F, Jonsson E, Lazzaroni M, Naesdal J, Rikner L, Walan A
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Aug;8(4):408-13. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198608000-00005.
In a study involving three centers, 105 patients with duodenal ulcer proven by endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with either the H+, K+, ATPase inhibitor omeprazole (20 mg or 40 mg taken as a single morning dose), or ranitidine (150 mg morning and night). It was a double-blind study using a double-dummy technique. Clinical assessment and laboratory investigations were carried out at 2, 4, and 8 weeks; endoscopy was done at 2 weeks, and if not healed, at 4 and 8 weeks. The patients in the three treatment groups were well matched. Significantly more patients treated with omeprazole healed compared with ranitidine at 2 weeks (p = 0.007) and at 4 weeks (p = 0.007), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two omeprazole groups. Pain was of similar severity at the start in all groups, but patients treated with omeprazole had fewer days with pain (median values being omeprazole 20 mg: 2 days; omeprazole 40 mg: 1 day; ranitidine: 7 days). The difference between the combined omeprazole groups and ranitidine was significant (p less than 0.02). There was also a tendency towards less severe daytime pain on omeprazole during the first week. The difference was statistically significant between omeprazole (40 mg) and ranitidine for days 2-7 (p less than 0.01). No change in laboratory screen attributable to drug treatment occurred. After healing, 79 patients entered a 6-month follow-up study with endoscopy at 3 and 6 months or whenever symptoms occurred. After 6 months relapses occurred in 14/24, 19/23, and 15/25 after 20 mg omeprazole, 40 mg omeprazole, and ranitidine, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项涉及三个中心的研究中,105例经内镜证实为十二指肠溃疡的患者被随机分配接受治疗,治疗药物为H⁺、K⁺ -ATP酶抑制剂奥美拉唑(20毫克或40毫克,晨起单次服用)或雷尼替丁(150毫克,早晚各一次)。这是一项采用双模拟技术的双盲研究。在第2、4和8周进行临床评估和实验室检查;在第2周进行内镜检查,若未愈合,则在第4周和第8周再次检查。三个治疗组的患者情况匹配良好。与雷尼替丁相比,接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者在第2周(p = 0.007)和第4周(p = 0.007)愈合的人数显著更多,但两个奥美拉唑组之间无统计学显著差异。所有组在开始时疼痛严重程度相似,但接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者疼痛天数较少(中位数分别为:奥美拉唑20毫克组:2天;奥美拉唑40毫克组:1天;雷尼替丁组:7天)。奥美拉唑联合组与雷尼替丁组之间的差异显著(p小于0.02)。在第一周,服用奥美拉唑期间白天疼痛也有减轻的趋势。在第2 - 7天,奥美拉唑(40毫克)与雷尼替丁之间的差异具有统计学意义(p小于0.01)。未发现因药物治疗导致的实验室检查结果变化。愈合后,79例患者进入为期6个月的随访研究,在第3个月和第6个月或出现症状时进行内镜检查。6个月后,服用20毫克奥美拉唑、40毫克奥美拉唑和雷尼替丁的患者分别有14/24、19/23和15/25复发。(摘要截选至250字)