Suppr超能文献

天花板控制与分期减压:减压持续时间与组织张力的比较。

Ceiling-controlled versus staged decompression: comparison between decompression duration and tissue tensions.

机构信息

Mares SpA, Salita Bonsen 4, 16035 Rapallo (GE), Italy.

Corresponding author: Dr Sergio Angelini, Mares SpA, Salita Bonsen 4, 16035 Rapallo (GE), Italy,

出版信息

Diving Hyperb Med. 2022 Mar 31;52(1):7-15. doi: 10.28920/dhm52.1.7-15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In dissolved gas decompression algorithms, the ceiling is the depth at which the dissolved gas pressure in at least one tissue equals the maximum tolerated value defined by the algorithm. Staged decompression prescribes stationary stops in three-metre intervals so as to never exceed this maximum tolerated value. This keeps the diver deeper than the ceiling until the ceiling itself decreases to coincide with the next, three-metre shallower stage. Ceiling-controlled decompression follows the ceiling in a continuous ascent.

METHODS

Mathematical simulations using the ZH-L16C decompression algorithm and gradient factors were carried out for several dive profiles to compare patterns of tissue gas supersaturation and overall decompression times for decompressions based on these approaches.

RESULTS

During a stationary staged decompression stop the available pressure gradient for inert gas washout diminished as inert gas is washed out while inhaled inert gas partial pressure remained unchanged. Ceiling-controlled decompression, on the other hand, maintained the available pressure gradient for inert gas washout at its maximum tolerated level. Decompressions were 4-12% shorter using ceiling-controlled approaches but at the cost of exposing tissues with faster half times to higher levels of supersaturation than they would experience during staged decompression.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceiling controlled approaches accelerate decompression but the effect of this on the risk of decompression sickness is unknown.

摘要

简介

在溶解气体减压算法中,顶棚是指至少有一种组织中的溶解气体压力等于算法定义的最大可耐受值的深度。分阶段减压规定以 3 米的间隔进行固定停留,以确保从不超过最大可耐受值。这使潜水员保持在顶棚深度以上,直到顶棚本身下降到与下一个 3 米较浅的阶段相吻合。顶棚控制减压在连续上升中遵循顶棚。

方法

使用 ZH-L16C 减压算法和梯度因子进行了数学模拟,对几种潜水剖面进行了比较,以比较基于这些方法的减压过程中组织气体过饱和和整体减压时间的模式。

结果

在固定的分阶段减压停留期间,随着吸入惰性气体的分压保持不变,惰性气体冲洗的可用压力梯度随着惰性气体的冲洗而减少。另一方面,顶棚控制减压保持了惰性气体冲洗的可用压力梯度处于最大可耐受水平。使用顶棚控制方法可以使减压时间缩短 4-12%,但代价是使半衰期较快的组织暴露于更高水平的过饱和状态,而不是在分阶段减压过程中所经历的过饱和状态。

结论

顶棚控制方法可以加速减压,但这对减压病风险的影响尚不清楚。

相似文献

4
Risk mitigation in divers with persistent (patent) foramen ovale.卵圆孔未闭潜水员的风险降低
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Jun 30;49(2):77-78. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.2.77-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Decompression illness: a comprehensive overview.减压病:全面概述。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2024 Mar 31;54(1Suppl):1-53. doi: 10.28920/dhm54.1.suppl.1-53.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验