Suppr超能文献

One Health:全球议程的社会科学探讨。

One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda.

机构信息

Université Paris Est Créteil, Lab'Urba, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France.

ANSES, Laboratoire de santé animale, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.

出版信息

Parasite. 2022;29:17. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2022014. Epub 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract

This article introduces the Parasite issue dedicated to part of the research in social sciences supported by the Domaine d'Intérêt Majeur de la Région Île-de-France (DIM) One Health [2016-2022]. We show how the four papers of this special issue are related. Jérôme Michalon recalls the genealogy of One Health and analyzes it as an "epistemic watchword". Using antibiotic resistance as a case study, Estera Badau demonstrates how "One Health" results from a series of formulas and the bringing together of a plurality of fields and actors. Nicolas Lainé and Serge Morand show how One Health fits in with attempts already initiated in the colonial period and context. They highlight the need to (re)legitimize local and non-human knowledge, in order to truly decolonize One Health and better prevent epidemic emergence. Finally, Frédéric Keck, Nicolas Lainé, Arnaud Morvan and Sandrine Ruhlmann show how zoonotic reservoir and cultural practices are linked in the context of three specific societies. This paper highlights two main contributions of social sciences: 1) To think about One Health genealogy, how the question is framed and by which actors. The questions of practices, social representations but also of the environment are less present than the issues of human and animal medicine. The Anthropocene, the Capitalocene, even some of its variations such as the "domesticoscene" thus appear to be key elements. 2) To propose methods and tools that make One Health operational, advocating a less asymmetrical view of types of knowledge (scientific, local, non-human) and more contextualized global health recommendations.

摘要

本文介绍了寄生虫问题,专门介绍了由大巴黎地区重点研究领域(DIM)“One Health”[2016-2022]支持的部分社会科学研究。我们展示了本期特刊的四篇论文是如何相互关联的。Jérôme Michalon 回顾了 One Health 的起源,并将其分析为一个“认识论口号”。Estera Badau 以抗生素耐药性为例,展示了“One Health”如何源于一系列公式以及多个领域和参与者的结合。Nicolas Lainé 和 Serge Morand 展示了 One Health 如何适应殖民时期和背景下已经开始的尝试。他们强调需要(重新)使地方和非人类知识合法化,以便真正实现 One Health 的去殖民化,并更好地预防传染病的出现。最后,Frédéric Keck、Nicolas Lainé、Arnaud Morvan 和 Sandrine Ruhlmann 展示了在三个特定社会背景下,人畜共患病储存库和文化实践是如何联系在一起的。本文强调了社会科学的两个主要贡献:1)思考 One Health 的起源、问题的框架以及由哪些参与者提出。实践、社会代表性问题,甚至环境问题,都不如人类和动物医学问题重要。人类世、资本世,甚至其一些变体,如“domesticoscene”,似乎都是关键因素。2)提出使 One Health 运作的方法和工具,倡导一种不太对称的知识类型(科学、地方、非人类)观点,并提出更具背景的全球卫生建议。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验