Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 23;24(3):e31449. doi: 10.2196/31449.
The use of mobile health technologies has been necessary to deliver patient education to patients with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This open-label randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of a diabetes educational platform-Taipei Medical University-LINE Oriented Video Education-delivered through a social media app.
Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a clinic through physician referral. The social media-based program included 51 videos: 10 about understanding diabetes, 10 about daily care, 6 about nutrition care, 21 about diabetes drugs, and 4 containing quizzes. The intervention group received two or three videos every week and care messages every 2 weeks through the social media platform for 3 months, in addition to usual care. The control group only received usual care. Outcomes were measured at clinical visits through self-reported face-to-face questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months after the intervention, including the Simplified Diabetes Knowledge Scale (true/false version), the Diabetes Care Profile-Attitudes Toward Diabetes Scales, the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA) levels. Health literacy was measured at baseline using the Newest Vital Sign tool. Differences in HbA levels and questionnaire scores before and after the intervention were compared between groups. The associations of knowledge, attitudes, and self-care activities with health literacy were assessed.
Patients with type 2 diabetes completed the 3-month study, with 91 out of 181 (50.3%) patients in the intervention group and 90 (49.7%) in the control group. The change in HbA did not significantly differ between groups (intervention group: mean 6.9%, SD 0.8% to mean 7.0%, SD 0.9%, P=.34; control group: mean 6.7%, SD 0.6% to mean 6.7%, SD 0.7%, P=.91). Both groups showed increased mean knowledge scores at 12 weeks, increasing from 68.3% (SD 16.4%) to 76.7% (SD 11.7%; P<.001) in the intervention group and from 64.8% (SD 18.2%) to 73.2% (SD 12.6%; P<.001) in the control group. Positive improvements in attitudes and self-care activities were only observed in the intervention group (attitudes: mean difference 0.2, SD 0.5, P=.001; self-care activities: mean difference 0.3, SD 1.2, P=.03). A 100% utility rate was achieved for 8 out of 21 (38%) medication-related videos. Low health literacy was a significant risk factor for baseline knowledge scores in the intervention group, with an odds ratio of 2.80 (95% CI 1.28-6.12; P=.01); this became insignificant after 3 months.
The social media-based program was effective at enhancing the knowledge, attitudes, and self-care activities of patients with diabetes. This intervention was also helpful for patients with low health literacy in diabetes knowledge. The program represents a potentially useful tool for delivering diabetes education to patients through social media, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04876274; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04876274.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,为患者提供糖尿病教育,使用移动健康技术是必要的。
本开放性随机对照试验评估了通过社交媒体应用程序提供的台北医学大学-LINE 导向视频教育糖尿病教育平台的效果。
通过医生推荐从诊所招募 2 型糖尿病患者。基于社交媒体的方案包括 51 个视频:10 个关于了解糖尿病,10 个关于日常护理,6 个关于营养护理,21 个关于糖尿病药物,4 个包含测验。干预组每周接受两到三个视频,并通过社交媒体平台每两周发送一次护理信息,持续 3 个月,除此之外还接受常规护理。对照组仅接受常规护理。通过基线和干预后 3 个月的临床就诊时的自我报告面对面问卷评估结局,包括简化糖尿病知识量表(真/假版本)、糖尿病护理态度-糖尿病量表、糖尿病自我护理活动总结和糖化血红蛋白(HbA)水平。在基线时使用最新生命体征工具测量健康素养。比较组间干预前后 HbA 水平和问卷评分的差异。评估知识、态度和自我护理活动与健康素养的相关性。
2 型糖尿病患者完成了 3 个月的研究,干预组有 91 名(50.3%)患者和对照组有 90 名(49.7%)患者完成了研究。组间 HbA 的变化无显著差异(干预组:平均 6.9%,标准差 0.8%至平均 7.0%,标准差 0.9%,P=.34;对照组:平均 6.7%,标准差 0.6%至平均 6.7%,标准差 0.7%,P=.91)。两组在 12 周时的平均知识评分均升高,从干预组的 68.3%(标准差 16.4%)增加到 76.7%(标准差 11.7%;P<.001),从对照组的 64.8%(标准差 18.2%)增加到 73.2%(标准差 12.6%;P<.001)。仅在干预组观察到态度和自我护理活动的积极改善(态度:平均差异 0.2,标准差 0.5,P=.001;自我护理活动:平均差异 0.3,标准差 1.2,P=.03)。对于 21 个药物相关视频中的 8 个(38%),达到了 100%的使用率。低健康素养是干预组基线知识评分的显著危险因素,优势比为 2.80(95%置信区间 1.28-6.12;P=.01);这在 3 个月后变得不显著。
基于社交媒体的方案在提高糖尿病患者的知识、态度和自我护理活动方面是有效的。对于糖尿病知识方面健康素养较低的患者,这种干预也很有帮助。该方案代表了一种通过社交媒体向患者提供糖尿病教育的潜在有用工具,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04876274;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04876274。