Birch Jonathan
The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Nous. 2022 Mar;56(1):133-153. doi: 10.1111/nous.12351. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
There is no agreement on whether any invertebrates are conscious and no agreement on a methodology that could settle the issue. How can the debate move forward? I distinguish three broad types of approach: theory-heavy, theory-neutral and theory-light. Theory-heavy and theory-neutral approaches face serious problems, motivating a middle path: the theory-light approach. At the core of the theory-light approach is a minimal commitment about the relation between phenomenal consciousness and cognition that is compatible with many specific theories of consciousness: the hypothesis that phenomenally conscious perception of a stimulus facilitates, relative to unconscious perception, a cluster of cognitive abilities in relation to that stimulus. This "facilitation hypothesis" can productively guide inquiry into invertebrate consciousness. What is needed? At this stage, not more theory, and not more undirected data gathering. What is needed is a systematic search for consciousness-linked cognitive abilities, their relationships to each other, and their sensitivity to masking.
对于是否有任何无脊椎动物具有意识,目前尚无定论,对于能够解决该问题的方法也没有达成共识。这场辩论如何才能取得进展?我区分了三种主要的方法类型:重理论型、理论中立型和轻理论型。重理论型和理论中立型方法面临严重问题,这促使我们走一条中间道路:轻理论型方法。轻理论型方法的核心是对现象意识与认知之间的关系做出最小限度的承诺,这种承诺与许多具体的意识理论兼容:即相对于无意识感知,对刺激的现象意识感知促进了与该刺激相关的一系列认知能力。这个“促进假说”可以有效地指导对无脊椎动物意识的探究。需要什么?在这个阶段,不需要更多的理论,也不需要更多无方向的数据收集。需要进行系统的探索,以寻找与意识相关的认知能力、它们彼此之间的关系以及它们对掩蔽的敏感性。