Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brigham Education Institute, 75 Francis Street, TH-1-127, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03237-6.
The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented in terms of the extent and rapidity of the disruption forced upon formal clinical education, most notably the extensive transition of clinical skills learning to interactive video-based clinical education.
In a phenomenologic study, we used thematic analysis to explore the COVID-19 disruption to clinical training and understand processes relating to adaptation in a large academic medical center. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical teachers and 16 trainees representing all levels of clinical learning. Interviews occurred within the initial three months of the crisis, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis coding process.
We constructed eight themes synthesizing our participants' perceptions of the immediate unanticipated disruption, noting in the process their alignment with a change management framework. These included: urgency in adapting, with an obvious imperative for change; overcoming inconsistent involvement and support through the formation of self-organized frontline coalitions; attempts to develop strategy and vision via initially reactive but eventually consistent communication; empowering a volunteer army through co-creation and a flattened hierarchy; and efforts to sustain improvement and positive momentum with celebration of trial, error, and growth. The majority of participants found positive outcomes resulting from the tumultuous change process. Moreover, they were now more readily accepting of change, and tolerant of the ambiguous and iterative nature inherent in the education change process. Many anticipated that some innovation would, or would at least deserve to, continue post- crisis.
The COVID-19 pandemic afforded an opportunity to study the content and process of change during an active crisis. In this case of clinical education, our findings provide insight into the ways an academic medical system adapts to unanticipated circumstances. We found alignment with broader organizational change management models and that, compared with crisis management models (and their shorter term focus on resolving such crises), stakeholders self-organized in a reliable manner that carries the potential advantage of preserving such beneficial change.
COVID-19 大流行在迫使正规临床教育中断的程度和速度方面是前所未有的,尤其是临床技能学习向基于互动视频的临床教育的广泛转变。
在一项现象学研究中,我们使用主题分析来探讨 COVID-19 对临床培训的干扰,并了解在一家大型学术医疗中心中适应这些干扰的相关过程。我们对 14 名临床教师和 16 名代表所有临床学习水平的学员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈是在危机开始后的头三个月内进行的,数据分析遵循主题分析编码过程。
我们构建了八个主题,综合了参与者对即时意外中断的看法,并注意到他们在这一过程中与变革管理框架相一致。这些主题包括:适应的紧迫性,改变的明显必要性;通过形成自我组织的前线联盟克服不一致的参与和支持;通过最初的反应但最终一致的沟通来尝试制定战略和愿景;通过共同创造和扁平化的层次结构赋予志愿人员力量;以及通过庆祝试验、错误和成长来努力维持改进和积极势头。大多数参与者发现,从动荡的变革过程中产生了积极的结果。此外,他们现在更容易接受变革,对教育变革过程中固有的模糊性和迭代性也更加宽容。许多人预计,一些创新将继续存在,或者至少值得在危机后继续存在。
COVID-19 大流行为在活跃的危机期间研究变革的内容和过程提供了机会。在这种临床教育的情况下,我们的研究结果提供了对学术医疗系统适应意外情况的方式的深入了解。我们发现与更广泛的组织变革管理模式一致,与危机管理模式(及其更关注解决此类危机的短期焦点)相比,利益相关者以可靠的方式自我组织,有可能保留这种有益的变革。