• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非药物性预防措施在疫苗接种效果之前对医护人员的 COVID-19 产生了影响:一项队列研究。

Non-Pharmacological Preventive Measures Had an Impact on COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers before the Vaccination Effect: A Cohort Study.

机构信息

Centre for Research in Occupational Health, Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063628.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19063628
PMID:35329313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955756/
Abstract

Healthcare workers have been and still are at the forefront of COVID-19 patient care. Their infection had direct implications and caused important challenges for healthcare performance. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of non-pharmacological preventive measures against COVID-19 among healthcare workers. This study is based on a dynamic cohort of healthcare workers ( = 5543) who had been hired by a Spanish hospital for at least one week during 2020. Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate the incidence rate and the rate ratio (RR) between the two waves (defined from 15 March to 21 June and from 22 June to 31 December), considering natural immunity during the first wave and contextual variables. All models were stratified by socio-occupational variables. The average COVID-19 incidence rate per 1000 worker-days showed a significant reduction between the two waves, dropping from 0.82 (CI95%: 0.73-0.91) to 0.39 (0.35-0.44). The adjusted RR was 0.54 (0.48-0.87) when natural immunity was acquired during the first wave, and contextual variables were considered. The significant reduction of the COVID-19 incidence rate could be explained mainly by improvement in the non-pharmacological preventive interventions. It is needed to identify which measures were more effective. Young workers and those with a replacement contract were identified as vulnerable groups that need greater preventive efforts. Future preparedness plans would benefit from these results.

摘要

医护人员一直是并且仍然是 COVID-19 患者护理的第一线。他们的感染直接影响并对医疗保健服务的绩效带来重要挑战。本研究旨在评估针对医护人员的 COVID-19 非药物预防措施的效果。本研究基于西班牙一家医院在 2020 年期间雇用的医护人员(=5543 人)的动态队列。使用负二项回归模型来估计两个波次(定义为 3 月 15 日至 6 月 21 日和 6 月 22 日至 12 月 31 日)之间的发病率和比率比(RR),同时考虑了第一波次的自然免疫力和背景变量。所有模型都按社会职业变量分层。每 1000 名工人工作日的 COVID-19 平均发病率在两个波次之间显著降低,从 0.82(95%CI:0.73-0.91)降至 0.39(0.35-0.44)。当第一波次获得自然免疫力且考虑背景变量时,调整后的 RR 为 0.54(0.48-0.87)。COVID-19 发病率的显著降低主要可以归因于非药物预防干预措施的改进。需要确定哪些措施更为有效。年轻的工作人员和那些具有替代合同的工作人员被确定为需要更多预防措施的弱势群体。未来的准备计划将受益于这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5095/8955756/b849819bf930/ijerph-19-03628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5095/8955756/b849819bf930/ijerph-19-03628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5095/8955756/b849819bf930/ijerph-19-03628-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-Pharmacological Preventive Measures Had an Impact on COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers before the Vaccination Effect: A Cohort Study.非药物性预防措施在疫苗接种效果之前对医护人员的 COVID-19 产生了影响:一项队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063628.
2
COVID-19 Immunity in the Cohort of IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Employees after BNT162b2 Vaccination: A Retrospective Observational Study.辉瑞-BioNTech 疫苗接种后意大利圣拉斐尔医院员工队列的 COVID-19 免疫:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Ig. 2024 Jul-Aug;36(4):432-445. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2615. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
Pre-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine for high-risk healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial.COVID-19 大流行期间,高危医护人员用羟氯喹进行暴露前预防:一项多中心、双盲随机对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04621-7.
4
[COVID-19 infections and effectiveness of the vaccination among healthcare workers].[医护人员中的新冠病毒感染情况及疫苗接种效果]
Orv Hetil. 2023 Feb 5;164(5):163-171. doi: 10.1556/650.2023.32709.
5
SARS-CoV-2 immunity and reasons for non-vaccination among healthcare workers from eastern and northern Switzerland: results from a nested multicentre cross-sectional study.瑞士东部和北部地区医护人员的 SARS-CoV-2 免疫与非接种原因:一项嵌套式多中心横断面研究的结果。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Apr 13;154:3734. doi: 10.57187/s.3734.
6
Workplace aggression against healthcare workers in a Spanish healthcare institution between 2019 and 2021: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.2019 年至 2021 年间西班牙医疗机构内针对医护人员的工作场所侵犯行为:COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;11:1070171. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1070171. eCollection 2023.
7
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines (CovishieldTM and Covaxin ®) in healthcare workers in Mumbai, India: A retrospective cohort analysis.印度孟买医护人员中新冠疫苗(CovishieldTM 和 Covaxin ®)的有效性:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276759. eCollection 2022.
9
Use, failure, and non-compliance of respiratory personal protective equipment and risk of upper respiratory tract infections-A longitudinal repeated measurement study during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers in Denmark.呼吸个人防护设备的使用、失效和不合规以及上呼吸道感染的风险——丹麦 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的纵向重复测量研究。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Apr 22;68(4):376-386. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae008.
10
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.

引用本文的文献

1
Is COVID-19 as Lethal as the Spanish Flu? The Australian Experience in 1919 and 2020 and the Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).新冠病毒(COVID-19)是否像西班牙流感(Spanish Flu)一样致命?澳大利亚在 1919 年和 2020 年的经验以及非药物干预措施(NPIs)的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;21(3):261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030261.
2
Non-Pharmacological Strategies and Interventions for Effective COVID-19 Control: A Narrative Review.有效控制新冠病毒的非药物策略与干预措施:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 11;12(20):6465. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206465.
3
Evaluation of Non-Pharmacological Measures Implemented in the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania.

本文引用的文献

1
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Associated Factors in Healthcare Workers before the Era of Vaccination at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Turkey.土耳其一家三级护理医院在疫苗接种时代之前医护人员中SARS-CoV-2抗体的血清流行率及相关因素
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;10(2):258. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020258.
2
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Employees of Three Hospitals of a Secondary Care Hospital Network in Germany and an Associated Fire Brigade: Results of a Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveillance Study Over 1 Year.德国一家二级保健医院网络的三家医院及其附属消防队员工中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率:一项为期 1 年的重复横断面监测研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;19(4):2402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042402.
3
罗马尼亚新冠疫情管理中实施的非药物措施评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;10(9):1756. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091756.
SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers before the Vaccination in Poland: Evolution from the First to the Second Pandemic Outbreak.波兰医护人员在接种疫苗前的 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率:从第一波大流行到第二波大流行的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042319.
4
Front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic: what is the effectiveness of using personal protective equipment in health service environments?-a systematic review.新冠疫情一线:在卫生服务环境中使用个人防护设备的效果如何?——系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Jan;95(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01775-y. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in Spanish healthcare workers.BNT162b2 mRNA新冠疫苗在西班牙医护人员中的有效性。
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2023 Jan;41(1):33-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020.2020 年夏 SARS-CoV-2 变异株在欧洲的传播。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7869):707-712. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03677-y. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Infection and death by COVID-19 in a cohort of healthcare workers in Mexico.墨西哥医护人员队列中 COVID-19 的感染和死亡。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):349-355. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3970. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Professionals and General Population During "First Wave" of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in Sicily, Italy.新冠疫情“第一波”期间医护人员和普通人群中的新型冠状病毒2型感染:在意大利西西里岛进行的一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2021 May 13;9:644008. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.644008. eCollection 2021.
9
Performance characteristics of the Abbott Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay.雅培 Alinity m 新冠病毒检测试剂盒的性能特征。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Jul;140:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104869. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Who complies with coronavirus disease 2019 precautions and who does not?谁遵守 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)预防措施,谁不遵守?
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;34(4):363-368. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000723.