Suppr超能文献

捕获测序可实现对人血中蜱传病原体的灵敏检测。

Capture Sequencing Enables Sensitive Detection of Tick-Borne Agents in Human Blood.

作者信息

Sanchez-Vicente Santiago, Jain Komal, Tagliafierro Teresa, Gokden Alper, Kapoor Vishal, Guo Cheng, Horn Elizabeth J, Lipkin W Ian, Tokarz Rafal

机构信息

Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States.

Lyme Disease Biobank, Portland, OR, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 7;13:837621. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.837621. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Assay sensitivity can be a limiting factor in the use of PCR as a tool for the detection of tick-borne pathogens in blood. We evaluated the performance of Tick-borne disease Capture Sequencing Assay (TBDCapSeq), a capture sequencing assay targeting tick-borne agents, to test 158 whole blood specimens obtained from the Lyme Disease Biobank. These included samples from 98 individuals with signs and symptoms of acute Lyme disease, 25 healthy individuals residing in Lyme disease endemic areas, and 35 samples collected from patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital or referred to the infectious disease clinic. Compared to PCR, TBDCapSeq had better sensitivity and could identify infections with a wider range of tick-borne agents. TBDCapSeq identified a higher rate of samples positive for (8 vs. 1 by PCR) and (26 vs. 15 by PCR). TBDCapSeq also identified previously unknown infections with , , and species. Overall, TBDCapSeq identified a pathogen in 43 samples vs. 23 using PCR, with four co-infections detected versus zero by PCR. We conclude that capture sequencing enables superior detection of tick-borne agents relative to PCR.

摘要

检测灵敏度可能是将聚合酶链反应(PCR)用作检测血液中蜱传病原体工具时的一个限制因素。我们评估了蜱传疾病捕获测序检测法(TBDCapSeq)的性能,这是一种针对蜱传病原体的捕获测序检测法,用于检测从莱姆病生物样本库获取的158份全血标本。这些标本包括来自98名有急性莱姆病体征和症状个体的样本、25名居住在莱姆病流行地区的健康个体的样本,以及从麻省总医院收治或转诊至传染病诊所的患者那里采集的35份样本。与PCR相比,TBDCapSeq具有更高的灵敏度,能够识别更多种类蜱传病原体的感染情况。TBDCapSeq检测出更高比例的 (PCR检测为8份阳性对1份)和 (PCR检测为26份阳性对15份)阳性样本。TBDCapSeq还识别出了先前未知的 、 和 物种感染。总体而言,TBDCapSeq在43份样本中检测出病原体,而PCR在23份样本中检测出病原体,TBDCapSeq检测出4例合并感染,而PCR未检测出合并感染。我们得出结论,相对于PCR,捕获测序能够更有效地检测蜱传病原体。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Polymicrobial Nature of Tick-Borne Diseases.蜱传疾病的多微生物性质。
mBio. 2019 Sep 10;10(5):e02055-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02055-19.
9
Microbiome analysis of Ixodes scapularis ticks from New York and Connecticut.纽约和康涅狄格州扇头蜱的微生物组分析。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Jun;10(4):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验