• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终关怀决策量表(EOL-CDI)的心理测量学特性:一项混合方法研究。

Psychometric properties of the end-of-life care decision inventory (EOL-CDI): a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Changwon National University, C.P.O. Box 51140, Changwon, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medical Services, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01952-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-022-01952-8
PMID:35331255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-of-life care decision-making has become important to support dignity and quality of life for patients who are facing death in Korea, along with the enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act in 2018. However, it seems that the concepts and policies related to the law are not yet familiar to health care providers or the general public. This unfamiliarity can hinder efficient end-of-life care discussions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to propose a valid and reliable tool to explore the level of understanding of concepts and attributes related to end-of-life care decisions.

METHODS

This is a mixed-methods study design. A relevant law and literature analysis, expert consultation, cognitive interviews of 10 adults, and cross-sectional survey for psychometric tests using data from 238 clinical nurses were performed to update a tool developed before the life-sustaining treatment Act was enacted in Korea.

RESULTS

29 items of the draft version were polished in terms of literacy, total length, and scoring method via cognitive interviews and finalized into 21 items through psychometric tests and expert consultations. The 21 items conformed to the Rasch unidimensional paramenters.

CONCLUSION

A tool to identify the level of understanding of concepts related to end-of-life care decisions was proposed through a rather rigorous process to ensure feasibility and validity/reliability. We recommend the proposed tool to apply to the adult population and nurses for evaluation and educational purposes.

摘要

背景

自 2018 年韩国颁布《维持生命治疗法》以来,临终关怀决策对于面临死亡的患者的尊严和生活质量变得尤为重要。然而,医疗保健提供者或公众似乎对与该法律相关的概念和政策并不熟悉。这种不熟悉可能会阻碍有效的临终关怀讨论。因此,本研究旨在提出一种有效且可靠的工具,以探讨与临终关怀决策相关的概念和属性的理解水平。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究设计。通过对相关法律和文献的分析、专家咨询、对 10 名成年人的认知访谈以及对 238 名临床护士进行的心理测量测试数据的横断面调查,对韩国颁布《维持生命治疗法》之前开发的工具进行了更新。

结果

通过认知访谈,对草稿版本的 29 个项目进行了文化素养、总长度和评分方法的润色,并通过心理测量测试和专家咨询最终确定为 21 个项目。这 21 个项目符合 Rasch 单维参数。

结论

通过相当严格的流程提出了一种识别与临终关怀决策相关的概念理解水平的工具,以确保可行性和有效性/可靠性。我们建议将该工具应用于成年人群体和护士,以进行评估和教育目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/32ee89b04718/12955_2022_1952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/3450a9c54eb8/12955_2022_1952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/1141766f645a/12955_2022_1952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/32ee89b04718/12955_2022_1952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/3450a9c54eb8/12955_2022_1952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/1141766f645a/12955_2022_1952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/8944124/32ee89b04718/12955_2022_1952_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the end-of-life care decision inventory (EOL-CDI): a mixed-methods study.临终关怀决策量表(EOL-CDI)的心理测量学特性:一项混合方法研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01952-8.
2
Development and psychometric properties of maternal health literacy inventory in pregnancy.妊娠期母婴健康素养量表的编制及心理测量学特性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234305. eCollection 2020.
3
Development of the End-of-Life Care Nursing Attitude Scale for Japanese Geriatrics.日本老年医学临终关怀护理态度量表的研制
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Jun;20(3):272-278. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000442.
4
Experience and perspectives of end-of-life care discussion and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment of Korea (POLST-K): a cross-sectional study.韩国(POLST-K)末期关怀讨论和医生维持生命治疗医嘱的经验和观点:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 7;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00897-x.
5
South African critical care nurses' views on end-of-life decision-making and practices.南非重症监护护士对临终决策和实践的看法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2014 Jan;19(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12026. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
6
A novel questionnaire to measure staff perception of end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit--development and psychometric testing.一种用于测量重症监护病房临终决策的员工感知的新问卷——开发和心理测量测试。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
7
Psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the Spanish version of the "Scale for End-of Life Caregiving Appraisal".《生命终末期照护评估量表》西班牙语版的心理测量学评估和文化适应性研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Jun;17(3):314-321. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000470. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
Factors influencing the provision of end-of-life care in critical care settings: development and testing of a survey instrument.重症监护环境中影响临终关怀提供的因素:一项调查问卷的开发与测试
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Mar;71(3):697-709. doi: 10.1111/jan.12576. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Measuring health-related quality of life in high-grade glioma patients at the end of life using a proxy-reported retrospective questionnaire.使用代理报告的回顾性问卷对晚期高级别胶质瘤患者的健康相关生活质量进行测量。
J Neurooncol. 2014 Jan;116(2):283-90. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1289-x. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometrics assessment of ethical decision-making around end-of-life care scale for adolescents in the final stage of life.针对处于生命末期的青少年临终关怀伦理决策量表的心理测量学评估。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 22;11:1266929. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1266929. eCollection 2023.
2
The moderating effect of attitudes in the relationship between knowledge and self-efficacy in palliative care among nurses: A cross-sectional, correlational study.护士在姑息治疗中知识与自我效能感关系中的态度的调节作用:一项横断面相关性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292135. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.预先医疗照护计划对心力衰竭的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):874-884. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
2
Development and psychometric analysis of the 10-item resilience scale specific to cancer: A multidimensional item response theory analysis.癌症特定 10 项韧性量表的开发与心理计量学分析:多维项目反应理论分析。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;41:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Decision Making for Patients with Cancer.
癌症患者的预先护理计划与临终决策
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018 Aug;34(3):316-326. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
4
Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.预先医疗照护计划:一项关于患有危及生命或生命有限疾病的患者体验的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1305-1321. doi: 10.1177/0269216318784474. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
6
Forgoing life-sustaining treatments in the ICU. To withhold or to withdraw: is that the question?放弃 ICU 中的生命维持治疗。是要保留还是要撤回:这是问题所在吗?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jun;84(6):756-765. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12299-1. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.医疗决策能力评估
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;31(6):530-40. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw051. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Patient Perspectives of Dignity, Autonomy and Control at the End of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.患者对临终时尊严、自主性和控制权的看法:系统评价与元民族志研究
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151435. eCollection 2016.
9
The Durban World Congress Ethics Round Table Conference Report: II. Withholding or withdrawing of treatment in elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit.德班世界大会伦理圆桌会议报告:二、重症监护病房老年患者的治疗 withhold 或 withdraw 问题
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
10
What Do Our Respondents Think We're Asking? Using Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Medical Education Surveys.我们的受访者认为我们在问什么?运用认知访谈改进医学教育调查。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Sep;5(3):353-6. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1.