• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍患者和单相情感障碍患者根据机器学习模型呈现出的活动模式差异。

Differences in mobility patterns according to machine learning models in patients with bipolar disorder and patients with unipolar disorder.

作者信息

Faurholt-Jepsen Maria, Busk Jonas, Rohani Darius Adam, Frost Mads, Tønning Morten Lindberg, Bardram Jakob Eyvind, Kessing Lars Vedel

机构信息

Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 1;306:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.054. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.054
PMID:35339568
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is essential to differentiate bipolar disorder (BD) from unipolar disorder (UD) as the course of illness and treatment guidelines differ between the two disorders. Measurements of activity and mobility could assist in this discrimination.

AIMS

  1. To investigate differences in smartphone-based location data between BD and UD, and 2) to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of combined location data in classifying BD and UD.

METHODS

Patients with BD and UD completed smartphone-based self-assessments of mood for six months, along with same-time passively collected smartphone data on location reflecting mobility patterns, routine and location entropy (chaos). A total of 65 patients with BD and 75 patients with UD were included.

RESULTS

A total of 2594 (patients with BD) and 2088 (patients with UD) observations of smartphone-based location data were available. During a depressive state, compared with patients with UD, patients with BD had statistically significantly lower mobility (e.g., total duration of moves per day (e 0.74, 95% CI 0.57; 0.97, p = 0.027)). In classification models during a depressive state, patients with BD versus patients with UD, there was a sensitivity of 0.70 (SD 0.07), a specificity of 0.77 (SD 0.07), and an AUC of 0.79 (SD 0.03).

LIMITATIONS

The relative low symptom severity in the present study may have contributed to the magnitude of the AUC.

CONCLUSION

Mobility patterns derived from mobile location data is a promising digital diagnostic marker in discriminating between patients with BD and UD.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BD)与单相情感障碍(UD)的病程和治疗指南不同,因此区分这两种疾病至关重要。活动和移动性的测量可能有助于这种区分。

目的

1)研究BD和UD患者基于智能手机的位置数据差异,2)研究综合位置数据在区分BD和UD中的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。

方法

BD和UD患者完成了为期六个月的基于智能手机的情绪自我评估,同时被动收集反映移动模式、日常活动和位置熵(混乱程度)的智能手机位置数据。共纳入65例BD患者和75例UD患者。

结果

共获得2594条(BD患者)和2088条(UD患者)基于智能手机的位置数据观测值。在抑郁状态下,与UD患者相比,BD患者的移动性在统计学上显著更低(例如,每天移动的总时长(e 0.74,95%可信区间0.57;0.97,p = 0.027))。在抑郁状态下的分类模型中,BD患者与UD患者相比,敏感性为0.70(标准差0.07),特异性为0.77(标准差0.07),AUC为0.79(标准差0.03)。

局限性

本研究中相对较低的症状严重程度可能影响了AUC的大小。

结论

从移动位置数据得出的移动模式是区分BD和UD患者的一种有前景的数字诊断标志物。

相似文献

1
Differences in mobility patterns according to machine learning models in patients with bipolar disorder and patients with unipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者和单相情感障碍患者根据机器学习模型呈现出的活动模式差异。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 1;306:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.054. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Using digital phenotyping to classify bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder - exploratory findings using machine learning models.利用数字表型对双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍进行分类——使用机器学习模型的探索性发现。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024 Apr;81:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
3
Daily mobility patterns in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy individuals.双相障碍患者与健康个体的日常活动模式。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.087. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
4
Discriminating between patients with unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy control individuals based on voice features collected from naturalistic smartphone calls.基于从自然状态下的智能手机通话中收集到的语音特征,区分单相情感障碍患者、双相情感障碍患者和健康对照个体。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Mar;145(3):255-267. doi: 10.1111/acps.13391. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Irritability in bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder measured daily using smartphone-based data: An exploratory post hoc study.使用基于智能手机的数据每日测量双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍中的易怒情绪:一项探索性事后分析研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 Jun;147(6):593-602. doi: 10.1111/acps.13558. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
6
Differentiating between bipolar and unipolar depression in functional and structural MRI studies.在功能和结构磁共振成像研究中区分双相和单相抑郁症。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 20;91:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Can P300 aid in the differential diagnosis of unipolar disorder versus bipolar disorder depression? A meta-analysis of comparative studies.P300 能否辅助单相障碍与双相障碍抑郁的鉴别诊断?一项对比研究的荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
8
Linguistic analysis of autobiographical narratives in unipolar and bipolar mood disorders in light of multiple code theory.基于多元码理论对单相和双相心境障碍的自传体叙事的语言分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 1;273:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.170. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Response inhibition related neural oscillatory patterns show reliable early identification of bipolar from unipolar depression in a Go/No-Go task.反应抑制相关的神经振荡模式可在 Go/No-Go 任务中可靠地早期识别双相情感障碍和单相抑郁症。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.187. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
Regional homogeneity of resting-state brain abnormalities in bipolar and unipolar depression.双相和单相抑郁的静息态脑异常的局部一致性。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar 5;41:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Digital Phenotyping to Discriminate Unipolar Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review.利用数字表型鉴别单相抑郁和双相情感障碍:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e72229. doi: 10.2196/72229.
2
Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Smartphone Technology to Enhance Personalized Assessment and Treatment for Eating Disorders.整合人工智能与智能手机技术以加强饮食失调的个性化评估与治疗。
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1002/eat.24468.
3
Uncovering Social States in Healthy and Clinical Populations Using Digital Phenotyping and Hidden Markov Models: Observational Study.
使用数字表型分析和隐马尔可夫模型揭示健康人群和临床人群的社会状态:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e64007. doi: 10.2196/64007.
4
Forecasting mental states in schizophrenia using digital phenotyping data.利用数字表型数据预测精神分裂症的心理状态。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Feb 7;4(2):e0000734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000734. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Beyond Detection: Towards Actionable Sensing Research in Clinical Mental Healthcare.超越检测:迈向临床精神卫生保健中的可操作传感研究
Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2024 Nov;8(4). doi: 10.1145/3699755. Epub 2024 Nov 21.