Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍患者和单相情感障碍患者根据机器学习模型呈现出的活动模式差异。

Differences in mobility patterns according to machine learning models in patients with bipolar disorder and patients with unipolar disorder.

作者信息

Faurholt-Jepsen Maria, Busk Jonas, Rohani Darius Adam, Frost Mads, Tønning Morten Lindberg, Bardram Jakob Eyvind, Kessing Lars Vedel

机构信息

Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 1;306:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.054. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is essential to differentiate bipolar disorder (BD) from unipolar disorder (UD) as the course of illness and treatment guidelines differ between the two disorders. Measurements of activity and mobility could assist in this discrimination.

AIMS

  1. To investigate differences in smartphone-based location data between BD and UD, and 2) to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of combined location data in classifying BD and UD.

METHODS

Patients with BD and UD completed smartphone-based self-assessments of mood for six months, along with same-time passively collected smartphone data on location reflecting mobility patterns, routine and location entropy (chaos). A total of 65 patients with BD and 75 patients with UD were included.

RESULTS

A total of 2594 (patients with BD) and 2088 (patients with UD) observations of smartphone-based location data were available. During a depressive state, compared with patients with UD, patients with BD had statistically significantly lower mobility (e.g., total duration of moves per day (e 0.74, 95% CI 0.57; 0.97, p = 0.027)). In classification models during a depressive state, patients with BD versus patients with UD, there was a sensitivity of 0.70 (SD 0.07), a specificity of 0.77 (SD 0.07), and an AUC of 0.79 (SD 0.03).

LIMITATIONS

The relative low symptom severity in the present study may have contributed to the magnitude of the AUC.

CONCLUSION

Mobility patterns derived from mobile location data is a promising digital diagnostic marker in discriminating between patients with BD and UD.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BD)与单相情感障碍(UD)的病程和治疗指南不同,因此区分这两种疾病至关重要。活动和移动性的测量可能有助于这种区分。

目的

1)研究BD和UD患者基于智能手机的位置数据差异,2)研究综合位置数据在区分BD和UD中的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。

方法

BD和UD患者完成了为期六个月的基于智能手机的情绪自我评估,同时被动收集反映移动模式、日常活动和位置熵(混乱程度)的智能手机位置数据。共纳入65例BD患者和75例UD患者。

结果

共获得2594条(BD患者)和2088条(UD患者)基于智能手机的位置数据观测值。在抑郁状态下,与UD患者相比,BD患者的移动性在统计学上显著更低(例如,每天移动的总时长(e 0.74,95%可信区间0.57;0.97,p = 0.027))。在抑郁状态下的分类模型中,BD患者与UD患者相比,敏感性为0.70(标准差0.07),特异性为0.77(标准差0.07),AUC为0.79(标准差0.03)。

局限性

本研究中相对较低的症状严重程度可能影响了AUC的大小。

结论

从移动位置数据得出的移动模式是区分BD和UD患者的一种有前景的数字诊断标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验