Pandor Abdullah, Fuller Gordon, Essat Munira, Sabir Lisa, Holt Chris, Buckley Woods Helen, Chatha Hridesh
The University of Sheffield ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2552-5260.
The University of Sheffield ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-3500.
Br Paramed J. 2022 Mar 1;6(4):26-40. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.26.
Older adults with major trauma are frequently under-triaged, increasing the risk of preventable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review was to identify which individual risk factors and predictors are likely to increase the risk of major trauma in elderly patients presenting to emergency medical services (EMS) following injury, to inform future elderly triage tool development.
Several electronic databases (including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to February 2021. Prospective or retrospective diagnostic studies were eligible if they examined a prognostic factor (often termed predictor or risk factor) for, or diagnostic test to identify, major trauma. Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessments using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool were undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.
Nine studies, all performed in US trauma networks, met review inclusion criteria. Vital signs (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and shock index with specific elderly cut-off points), EMS provider judgement, comorbidities and certain crash scene variables (other occupants injured, occupant not independently mobile and head-on collision) were identified as significant pre-hospital variables associated with major trauma in the elderly in multi-variable analyses. Heart rate and anticoagulant were not significant predictors. Included studies were at moderate or high risk of bias, with applicability concerns secondary to selected study populations.
Existing pre-hospital major trauma triage tools could be optimised for elderly patients by including elderly-specific physiology thresholds. Future work should focus on more relevant reference standards and further evaluation of novel elderly relevant triage tool variables and thresholds.
遭受严重创伤的老年人常常被分诊不足,这增加了可预防的发病和死亡风险。本系统评价的目的是确定哪些个体风险因素和预测指标可能会增加受伤后前往紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构就诊的老年患者发生严重创伤的风险,以为未来老年分诊工具的开发提供参考。
检索了几个电子数据库(包括Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆),检索时间从建库至2021年2月。如果前瞻性或回顾性诊断研究检查了严重创伤的预后因素(通常称为预测指标或风险因素)或用于识别严重创伤的诊断测试,则该研究符合纳入标准。至少两名评审员独立进行研究选择、数据提取以及使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具进行偏倚风险评估。采用叙述性综合方法总结研究结果。
9项均在美国创伤网络中开展的研究符合综述纳入标准。在多变量分析中,生命体征(格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、收缩压、呼吸频率以及具有特定老年切点的休克指数)、EMS提供者的判断、合并症以及某些事故现场变量(其他乘客受伤、乘客不能独立活动以及正面碰撞)被确定为与老年患者严重创伤相关的重要院前变量。心率和抗凝剂不是显著的预测指标。纳入的研究存在中度或高度偏倚风险,由于所选研究人群的原因,存在适用性问题。
现有的院前严重创伤分诊工具可通过纳入针对老年人的生理阈值来优化,以适用于老年患者。未来的工作应侧重于更相关的参考标准以及对新的老年相关分诊工具变量和阈值的进一步评估。