A retrospective comparison of salvage intensive chemotherapy venetoclax-combined regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

BACKGROUND

Evidence that a venetoclax (VEN)-combined regimen is effective in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) is emerging. However, it is unknown how VEN-combined low intensity treatment compares to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in medically fit patients with R/R AML.

METHODS

We compared AML patients who received IC ( = 89) to those who received a VEN in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine (VEN combination) ( = 54) as their first- or second-line salvage after failing anthracycline-containing intensive chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 49 years, and significantly more patients in the VEN combination group were in their second salvage and had received prior stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall response rates including CR, CRi, and MLFS were comparable (44.0% for IC vs. 59.3% for VEN combination,  = 0.081), but VEN combination group compared to IC group tended to show lower treatment related mortality. The rate of bridging to SCT was the same (68.5%), but the percentage of SCT at blast clearance was significantly higher in the VEN-combined group (62.3% vs. 86.5%,  = 0.010). After median follow-up periods of 22.5 (IC) and 11.3 months (VEN combination), the median overall survival was 8.9 (95% CI, 5.4-12.4) and 12.4 months (95% CI, 9.5-15.2) ( = 0.724), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VEN combination provides a comparable anti-leukemic response and survival to salvage IC, and provide a bridge to SCT with better disease control in medically-fit patients with R/R AML.