Suppr超能文献

(subparaneural 译为“肩胛旁神经上干”,upper trunk 译为“神经干上段”,原文意思是“肩胛旁神经上干和传统肌间沟入路阻滞在关节镜肩袖手术中的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验”,为了保证译文的流畅性,这里将“subparaneural upper trunk”译为“肩胛旁神经上干阻滞”,“conventional interscalene block”译为“传统肌间沟入路阻滞”。) 肩胛旁神经上干阻滞与传统肌间沟入路阻滞在关节镜肩袖手术中的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。

Comparison Between Subparaneural Upper Trunk and Conventional Interscalene Blocks for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2022 Jun 1;134(6):1308-1317. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005990. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although interscalene nerve block is the standard for shoulder analgesia, the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis restricts its use in patients with compromised pulmonary function. We hypothesized that a novel subparaneural upper trunk block would provide noninferior postoperative analgesia but superior diaphragmatic sparing effect compared to interscalene block.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial comprised 96 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery under either subparaneural upper trunk block (5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) or interscalene block (15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine), followed by supraclavicular nerve block (5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine). General anesthesia was standardized. The coprimary outcomes were (1) recovery room resting pain score at 30 minutes, measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1 point and (2) the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, diagnosed using ultrasound. Among secondary outcomes, resting pain scores were assessed with numerical rating scale at 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Recovery room resting pain scores at 30 minutes were 0 (0-1) in the subparaneural upper trunk group versus 0 (0-0) in the interscalene group, with a median difference of 0 (95% CI, 0-0); the upper 95% CI limit was lower than the prespecified noninferiority margin (noninferiority P < .001). Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was observed in 16.7% of patients in the subparaneural upper trunk group versus 100% of those in the interscalene group (RR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31; P < .001), with complete paralysis occurring in 6.3% and 93.7% of patients, respectively. In this study, any reported differences in pain scores at 4, 8, and 24 hours postoperatively were not clinically important.

CONCLUSIONS

The subparaneural upper trunk block compared to interscalene block provided noninferior analgesia at 30 minutes in the recovery room after arthroscopic shoulder surgery but resulted in less hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.

摘要

背景

尽管经肌间沟神经阻滞是肩部镇痛的标准方法,但膈神经麻痹的风险限制了其在肺功能受损患者中的应用。我们假设一种新的神经旁上干阻滞将提供非劣效的术后镇痛效果,但膈神经保留效果优于经肌间沟阻滞。

方法

本随机对照试验纳入 96 例行关节镜肩关节手术的患者,分别接受神经旁上干阻滞(5 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因)或经肌间沟阻滞(15 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因),随后行锁骨上神经阻滞(5 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因)。全麻标准化。主要转归为(1)恢复室 30 分钟时静息疼痛评分,采用 11 点数字评分量表测量,预设非劣效性边界为 1 分;(2)膈神经麻痹的发生率,采用超声诊断。次要转归中,术后 4、8 和 24 小时采用数字评分量表评估静息疼痛评分。

结果

恢复室 30 分钟时静息疼痛评分在神经旁上干组为 0(0-1),在经肌间沟组为 0(0-0),中位数差值为 0(95%CI,0-0);上限位于预设非劣效性边界以下(非劣效性 P <.001)。神经旁上干组膈神经麻痹发生率为 16.7%,经肌间沟组为 100%(RR,0.17;95%CI,0.09-0.31;P <.001),完全麻痹分别发生在 6.3%和 93.7%的患者中。在这项研究中,术后 4、8 和 24 小时报告的疼痛评分差异无临床意义。

结论

与经肌间沟阻滞相比,关节镜肩关节手术后在恢复室 30 分钟时,神经旁上干阻滞提供了非劣效的镇痛效果,但膈神经麻痹发生率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验