数据出版中的伦理责任处理。
Responsible handling of ethics in data publication.
机构信息
California Digital Library, University of California Office of the President, Oakland, California, United States of America.
ASAPbio, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 28;20(3):e3001606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001606. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Abstract
A global working group has developed recommendations for the responsible handling of the growing range of ethics cases related to data publication, but further community work is needed toward a responsible and cohesive data publishing ecosystem.
摘要
一个全球工作组已经制定了有关负责任处理与数据发布相关的日益增多的伦理案例的建议，但需要进一步的社区工作，以建立一个负责任和有凝聚力的数据发布生态系统。
相似文献
1
Responsible handling of ethics in data publication.数据出版中的伦理责任处理。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 28;20(3):e3001606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001606. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium.比利时医学出版中的伦理问题。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Jan-Mar;81(1):45-48.
3
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.医学科学家的发表压力与科研不端行为
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):64-71. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552421. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
4
Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics: one editor's experience.科研不端行为与出版伦理违规：一位编辑的经历
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):527-33.
5
Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making.待修复：正在形成中的出版道德规范和研究记录。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Feb;49(1):77-101. doi: 10.1177/0306312718824663. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.编辑与出版商出版伦理声明。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1351-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351.
7
An analysis on the research ethics cases managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) between 1997 and 2010.对 1997 年至 2010 年期间由出版伦理委员会（COPE）管理的研究伦理案例进行分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):621-31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9273-3. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
8
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).研究机构与期刊在研究诚信案件方面的合作：出版伦理委员会（COPE）的指导。
Maturitas. 2012 Jun;72(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
9
Perspective: publication ethics and the emerging scientific workforce: understanding "plagiarism" in a global context.观点：出版伦理与新兴科研队伍：在全球背景下理解“剽窃”
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):51-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823aadc7.
10
Ethics in publication and the "operator".
Anesthesiology. 1991 Sep;75(3):545-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199109000-00031.
引用本文的文献
1
Using digitally mediated methods in sensitive contexts: a threat analysis and critical reflection on data security, privacy, and ethical concerns in the case of Afghanistan.在敏感环境中使用数字媒介方法：以阿富汗为例对数据安全、隐私及伦理问题的威胁分析与批判性反思
Z Friedens Konfliktforsch. 2022;11(2):95-128. doi: 10.1007/s42597-022-00088-2. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
Provide proactive reproducible analysis transparency with every publication.在每次发表时提供主动的、可重复的分析透明度。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 5;12(3):241936. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241936. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.减少撤回科学文献的意外传播：RISRS报告的建议
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Sep 19;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x.
本文引用的文献
1
CODECHECK: an Open Science initiative for the independent execution of computations underlying research articles during peer review to improve reproducibility.CODECHECK：一项开放科学计划，旨在促进同行评审期间对研究文章基础计算的独立执行，以提高可重复性。
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 30;10:253. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51738.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Learning from a retraction.从撤稿中吸取教训。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31958-9. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Crowd-based peer review can be good and fast.
Nature. 2017 May 30;546(7656):9. doi: 10.1038/546009a.
4
Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org Registry.使研究数据存储库可见：re3data.org 注册中心。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 4;8(11):e78080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078080. eCollection 2013.
Zotero 插件