Shelat Sanmay, Cats Oded, van Cranenburgh Sander
Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Transport and Logistics Group, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 May;159:357-371. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.027. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
With a few exceptions, public transport ridership around the world has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. Travellers are now likely to adapt their behaviour with a focus on factors that contribute to the risk of COVID-19 transmission. Given the unprecedented spatial and temporal scale of this crisis, these changes in behaviour may even be sustained after the pandemic. To evaluate travellers' behaviour in public transport networks during these times and assess how they will respond to future changes in the pandemic, we conduct a stated choice experiment with train travellers in the Netherlands at the end of the first infection wave. We specifically assess behaviour related to three criteria affecting the risk of COVID-19 transmission: (i) crowding, (ii) exposure duration, and (iii) prevalent infection rate. Observed choices are analysed using a latent class choice model which reveals two, nearly equally sized latent traveller segments: 'COVID Conscious' and 'Infection Indifferent'. The former has a significantly higher valuation of crowding, accepting, on average 8.75 min extra waiting time (average total travel time in the choice scenarios was about 40 min) to reduce one person on-board. Moreover, this class indicates a strong desire to sit without anybody in the neighbouring seat and is quite sensitive to changes in the prevalent infection rate. By contrast, the Infection Indifferent class has a value of crowding (1.04 waiting time minutes/person) that is only slightly higher than pre-pandemic estimates and is relatively unaffected by infection rates. We find that older and female travellers are more likely to be COVD Conscious while those reporting to use the trains more frequently during the pandemic tend to be Infection Indifferent. Further analysis also reveals differences between the two segments in attitudes towards the pandemic and self-reported rule-following behaviour. We believe that the behavioural insights from this study will not only contribute to better demand forecasting for service planning but will also inform public transport policy decisions aimed at curbing the shift to private modes.
除了少数例外情况,全球公共交通客流量受到新冠疫情的严重冲击。如今,出行者可能会调整其行为,重点关注那些会增加新冠病毒传播风险的因素。鉴于这场危机在空间和时间上的规模空前,这些行为变化甚至可能在疫情结束后仍会持续。为了评估这段时期出行者在公共交通网络中的行为,并评估他们将如何应对疫情未来的变化,我们在荷兰首次感染浪潮结束时对火车乘客进行了一项陈述偏好实验。我们专门评估了与影响新冠病毒传播风险的三个标准相关的行为:(i)拥挤程度,(ii)暴露时长,以及(iii)流行感染率。使用潜在类别选择模型对观察到的选择进行分析,该模型揭示了两个规模几乎相等的潜在出行者群体:“新冠意识型”和“感染无感型”。前者对拥挤程度的重视程度明显更高,为了减少车上一人,平均愿意多等8.75分钟(选择场景中的平均总出行时间约为40分钟)。此外,这类人群表示非常希望邻座无人,并对流行感染率的变化相当敏感。相比之下,“感染无感型”群体对拥挤程度的重视程度(1.04分钟等待时间/人)仅略高于疫情前的估计,且相对不受感染率影响。我们发现,年龄较大的出行者和女性出行者更有可能是“新冠意识型”,而那些在疫情期间报告更频繁乘坐火车的人往往是“感染无感型”。进一步分析还揭示了这两个群体在对疫情的态度和自我报告的遵守规则行为方面的差异。我们认为,这项研究的行为洞察不仅将有助于为服务规划提供更好的需求预测,还将为旨在遏制向私人交通方式转变的公共交通政策决策提供参考。