Suppr超能文献

电干针与常规物理治疗在治疗非特异性慢性腰痛患者活动和潜伏肌筋膜触发点中的比较。

Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine, University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almeria, Spain.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Mar 28;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain is considered to be one of the main causes of absenteeism from work and primary and specialized consultations. The symptoms of nonspecific chronic low back pain may be accompanied by the activation of myofascial trigger points in the muscles, together with local and/or referred pain. Electrical dry needling is increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar myofascial pain. Conventional physiotherapy, however, is a popular approach to chronic pathologies, and there is evidence of different modalities of physiotherapy being used in the treatment of chronic low back pain. The aim of this study has been to determine the effectiveness of electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy when applied to active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

METHODS

This is a controlled, randomized, two-arm, double-blind study. A total of 92 patients with chronic low back pain (time to onset ≥ 3 months, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 4) will be recruited from the University of Almería. Participants will be divided into two study groups (n = 40) to receive treatment of low back pain with electrical dry needling and conventional physiotherapy (ischaemic compression, analytic stretching and postural education training dossier). A total of 6 sessions will be administered once a week for 6 weeks. Pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, quality of life, quality of sleep, anxiety and depression, pressure pain threshold, abdominal strength and lumbar mobility will be recorded at 6 weeks (post-immediate) and 2 months after the end of treatment.

DISCUSSION

We believe that an approach including electrical dry needling to chronic low back pain dysfunction will be more effective in these patients. The results of this study will inform clinicians on which type of treatment is more beneficial for patients with chronic low back pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04804228. Registered on 14 January 2021.

摘要

背景

慢性下背痛被认为是缺勤和初级及专科咨询的主要原因之一。非特异性慢性下背痛的症状可能伴有肌肉中肌筋膜触发点的激活,以及局部和/或牵涉痛。电干针疗法越来越多地用于治疗腰椎肌筋膜疼痛。然而,传统的物理疗法是治疗慢性疾病的一种流行方法,有证据表明不同的物理疗法模式被用于治疗慢性下背痛。本研究旨在确定电干针疗法与常规物理疗法在治疗非特异性慢性下背痛患者的活动性和潜伏性肌筋膜触发点时的有效性。

方法

这是一项对照、随机、两臂、双盲研究。共有 92 名慢性下背痛患者(发病时间≥3 个月,Roland Morris 残疾问卷评分≥4)将从阿尔梅里亚大学招募。参与者将被分为两组(n=40),接受电干针疗法和常规物理疗法(缺血性压迫、分析性伸展和姿势教育训练档案)治疗下背痛。总共将进行 6 次治疗,每周一次,持续 6 周。在 6 周(即刻后)和治疗结束后 2 个月,记录疼痛强度、残疾、运动恐惧、生活质量、睡眠质量、焦虑和抑郁、压痛阈值、腹部力量和腰椎活动度。

讨论

我们相信,针对慢性下背痛功能障碍的电干针疗法方法将对这些患者更有效。这项研究的结果将为临床医生提供关于哪种治疗类型对慢性下背痛患者更有益的信息。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04804228。注册于 2021 年 1 月 14 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60f6/8961901/46d969417335/13063_2022_6179_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验