Flay B R
Prev Med. 1986 Sep;15(5):451-74. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90024-1.
The concepts of efficacy and effectiveness are examined from the viewpoints of the traditions and philosophies of health-care research and social program evaluation. Consideration of the status of the program being assessed, its availability to, and its acceptance by the target audience leads to the derivation of four levels of health promotion program testing: efficacy trials, under optimum conditions of program implementation and recipient participation; treatment effectiveness trials, with expected variation in target audience acceptance; implementation effectiveness trials, under varying conditions of implementation; and program evaluation of previously untested programs. These four levels of testing, together with experience in one area of health promotion research (smoking prevention), suggest eight phases of research for the development of health promotion programs: basic research, hypothesis development, pilot applied research, prototype evaluation studies, efficacy trials, treatment effectiveness trials, implementation effectiveness trials, and demonstration evaluations. Issues of design, the use of random assignment, the use of blinding procedures, and of the role of process evaluation in these different research levels, particularly efficacy and effectiveness trials, are considered in light of the terminologies and methods of health-care and social program evaluation research. Suggestions are made for improved health promotion research.
从医疗保健研究和社会项目评估的传统与理念角度审视了疗效和效果的概念。对被评估项目的现状、目标受众对其的可及性和接受度进行考量后,得出了健康促进项目测试的四个层次:在项目实施和接受者参与的最佳条件下进行的疗效试验;目标受众接受度存在预期差异的治疗效果试验;在不同实施条件下进行的实施效果试验;以及对先前未经测试的项目进行项目评估。这四个测试层次,连同健康促进研究一个领域(预防吸烟)的经验,提出了健康促进项目开发研究的八个阶段:基础研究、假设形成、试点应用研究、原型评估研究、疗效试验、治疗效果试验、实施效果试验和示范评估。根据医疗保健和社会项目评估研究的术语和方法,考虑了设计问题、随机分配的使用、盲法程序的使用以及过程评估在这些不同研究层次(尤其是疗效和效果试验)中的作用。针对改进健康促进研究提出了建议。