Shafaghat Tahereh, Bastani Peivand, Nasab Mohammad Hasan Imani, Bahrami Mohammad Amin, Montazer Mahsa Roozrokh Arshadi, Zarchi Mohammad Kazem Rahimi, Edirippulige Sisira
School of Management and Medical Informatics, Health Human Recourses Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management Research Center, Shahid Saoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Arch Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;80(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00843-0.
Scientific evidence is the basis for improving public health; decision-making without sufficient attention to evidence may lead to unpleasant consequences. Despite efforts to create comprehensive guidelines and models for evidence-based decision-making (EBDM), there isn`t any to make the best decisions concerning scarce resources and unlimited needs. The present study aimed to develop a comprehensive applied framework for EBDM.
This was a Best-Fit Framework (BFF) synthesis conducted in 2020. A comprehensive systematic review was done via six main databases including PUBMED, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and ProQuest using related keywords. After the evidence quality appraisal, data were extracted and analyzed via thematic analysis. Results of the thematic analysis and the concepts generated by the research team were then synthesized to achieve the best-fit framework applying Carroll et al. (2013) approach.
Four thousand six hundred thirteen studies were retrieved, and due to the full-text screening of the studies, 17 final articles were selected for extracting the components and steps of EBDM in Health System Management (HSM). After collecting, synthesizing, and categorizing key information, the framework of EBDM in HSM was developed in the form of four general scopes. These comprised inquiring, inspecting, implementing, and integrating, which included 10 main steps and 47 sub-steps.
The present framework provided a comprehensive guideline that can be well adapted for implementing EBDM in health systems and related organizations especially in underdeveloped and developing countries where there is usually a lag in updating and applying evidence in their decision-making process. In addition, this framework by providing a complete, well-detailed, and the sequential process can be tested in the organizational decision-making process by developed countries to improve their EBDM cycle.
科学证据是改善公众健康的基础;在决策过程中若没有充分重视证据,可能会导致不良后果。尽管人们努力制定基于证据的决策(EBDM)的全面指南和模型,但对于在资源稀缺和需求无限的情况下做出最佳决策,尚无此类指南和模型。本研究旨在开发一个全面的EBDM应用框架。
这是一项于2020年进行的最佳拟合框架(BFF)综合研究。通过六个主要数据库(包括PubMed、Scopus、科学网、科学Direct、EMBASE和ProQuest)使用相关关键词进行了全面的系统综述。在对证据质量进行评估后,通过主题分析提取并分析数据。然后将主题分析的结果与研究团队提出的概念进行综合,以采用卡罗尔等人(2013年)的方法实现最佳拟合框架。
共检索到4613项研究,经过对这些研究的全文筛选,选择了17篇最终文章来提取卫生系统管理(HSM)中EBDM的组成部分和步骤。在收集、综合和分类关键信息后,以四个总体范围的形式构建了HSM中EBDM的框架。这些范围包括询问、检查、实施和整合,其中包括10个主要步骤和47个子步骤。
本框架提供了一个全面的指南,特别适用于在卫生系统及相关组织中实施EBDM,尤其是在欠发达国家和发展中国家,这些国家在决策过程中更新和应用证据方面通常存在滞后。此外,该框架通过提供一个完整、详细且有序的过程,可供发达国家在组织决策过程中进行测试,以改进其EBDM周期。