• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗机构将循证决策制度化的关键因素 卫生组织中基于证据的决策制度化的关键因素]

[Critical factors for institutionalizing evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organizationsFactores críticos para la institucionalización de la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia en las organizaciones de salud].

作者信息

Toma Tereza Setsuko, Barreto Jorge Otávio Maia, Gomes Romeu, Machado Maria Lúcia Teixeira, Riera Rachel, de Toledo Isabela Porto, da Silva Silvio Fernandes

机构信息

Instituto de Saúde São Paulo - SP Brasil Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo - SP, Brasil.

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz Brasília-DF Brasil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Brasília-DF, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Apr 9;49:e33. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.33. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2025.33
PMID:40206568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980526/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To map critical factors for sustainable processes in the institutionalization of evidence-informed decision-making in public health organizations.

METHOD

A rapid critical interpretative synthesis was carried out based on searches conducted in databases, websites, and reference lists, with findings categorized into an appropriate framework.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were analyzed and six dimensions of critical factors were addressed: 1) governance, aimed at dealing with difficulties in the organizational context and motivation for change, together with a management style that has a long-term vision and invests in communication tools; 2) standardized routine processes, involving the characteristics of information that facilitate its incorporation into organizational practices; 3) leadership and commitment, revealing the importance of identifying and engaging leaders who can influence the adoption of evidence-informed policies in organizations; 4) resources, which correspond to the need for training programs that ensure the availability of a team with the skills needed to identify research evidence within a supportive organizational infrastructure; 5) partnerships, collective action, and support, which show the importance of involving stakeholders in collaborative processes, using exchange structures; and 6) culture, related to efforts to bring research and policy closer together, so that they are more receptive to organizational changes.

CONCLUSION

The identified critical factors can provide a reference framework to support improvement planning and the institutionalization of evidence use. The results are applicable to organizations that formulate and implement public health policies and other social policies.

摘要

目的

梳理公共卫生组织中循证决策制度化可持续进程的关键因素。

方法

基于在数据库、网站和参考文献列表中进行的检索开展快速批判性解释性综合分析,将研究结果归类到合适的框架中。

结果

分析了20项研究,涉及关键因素的六个维度:1)治理,旨在应对组织环境中的困难和变革动机,以及具有长远眼光并投资于沟通工具的管理风格;2)标准化常规流程,涉及便于将信息纳入组织实践的信息特征;3)领导力与承诺,揭示了识别和吸引能够影响组织采用循证政策的领导者的重要性;4)资源,对应于开展培训项目的需求,这些项目要确保在支持性组织架构内拥有具备识别研究证据所需技能的团队;5)伙伴关系、集体行动与支持,表明了利用交流结构让利益相关者参与协作过程的重要性;6)文化,与拉近研究和政策距离的努力相关,以便它们更易于接受组织变革。

结论

所确定的关键因素可为支持改进规划和证据应用制度化提供参考框架。研究结果适用于制定和实施公共卫生政策及其他社会政策的组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d70/11980526/08f43f343f81/rpsp-49-e33-Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d70/11980526/08f43f343f81/rpsp-49-e33-Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d70/11980526/08f43f343f81/rpsp-49-e33-Figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Critical factors for institutionalizing evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organizationsFactores críticos para la institucionalización de la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia en las organizaciones de salud].[医疗机构将循证决策制度化的关键因素 卫生组织中基于证据的决策制度化的关键因素]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Apr 9;49:e33. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.33. eCollection 2025.
2
Protocol for a systematic mapping review of surgical and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.治疗三叉神经痛的手术和药物干预的系统综述方案。
Medwave. 2024 May 8;24(4):e2759. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2024.04.2759.
3
Impact of digital clinical decision support on quality of care and antibiotic stewardship for children under five in South-Central Somalia.数字临床决策支持对索马里中南部五岁以下儿童医疗质量和抗生素管理的影响。
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 Dec 2;2(Suppl 2):ii32-ii44. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae029. eCollection 2024.
4
[Barriers perceived by health directors for evidenced-based decision-makingObstáculos percibidos por los directores de servicios de salud para la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia].[卫生主管对循证决策所感知到的障碍 卫生服务主管对循证决策所感知到的障碍]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Dec 12;41:e147. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.147. eCollection 2017.
5
Does investment in COVID-19 information systems strengthen national digital health architecture? Lessons learned from Burkina Faso, Indonesia, Mali and Suriname.对新冠疫情信息系统的投资是否能加强国家数字卫生架构?来自布基纳法索、印度尼西亚、马里和苏里南的经验教训。
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 May 6;2(Suppl 1):i29-i39. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae001. eCollection 2024.
6
Prioritization of strategies to approach the judicialization of health in Latin America and the Caribbean.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区应对卫生司法化问题的策略优先次序
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Sep 1;50:56. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050005728.
7
Guía de práctica clínica mexicana para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las dislipidemias y enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerótica.墨西哥血脂异常和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病诊断与治疗临床实践指南。
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2022;92(Supl):1-62. doi: 10.24875/ACM.M22000081.
8
Perceptional gaps among women, husbands and family members about intentions for birthplace: a cross-sectional study.女性、丈夫及家庭成员在出生地意愿上的认知差距:一项横断面研究
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Jan 30;25:e2840. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1658.2840.
9
Implementation of a data use strategy in situation rooms in two metropolitan areas of Honduras in the context of COVID-19.在新冠肺炎疫情背景下,洪都拉斯两个大城市的情况室实施数据使用策略。
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 May 6;2(Suppl 1):i40-i51. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae007. eCollection 2024.
10
Understanding the impact of mlearning platform LEAP on learning outcomes and health care referral behavior of community health volunteers in Kenya.了解移动学习平台LEAP对肯尼亚社区卫生志愿者学习成果及医疗转诊行为的影响。
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 Dec 2;2(Suppl 2):ii25-ii31. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae036. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.论文 2:进行快速审查。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5.
2
Identifying barriers and facilitators of translating research evidence into clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews.将研究证据转化为临床实践的障碍和促进因素的识别:系统评价综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3265-e3276. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13898. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Collaboration between health system decision makers and professional researchers to coproduce knowledge, a scoping review.
卫生系统决策者与专业研究人员合作以共同生成知识:范围综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Dec;37 Suppl 1:45-58. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3513. Epub 2022 May 28.
4
A framework of evidence-based decision-making in health system management: a best-fit framework synthesis.卫生系统管理中基于证据的决策框架:最佳适配框架综合分析
Arch Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;80(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00843-0.
5
Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: a critical interpretive synthesis.将证据转化为健康政策制定的制度化领域和流程:批判性综合解读。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00820-7.
6
Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.伊朗基于证据的卫生决策制定的个人和机构能力建设:本地和全球证据的混合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 12;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00816-3.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
8
A mapping of facilitators and barriers to evidence-based management in health systems: a scoping review study.促进和阻碍卫生系统循证管理的因素分析:范围综述研究。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01595-8.
9
How can we monitor the impact of national health information systems? Results from a scoping review.如何监测国家卫生信息系统的影响?一项范围综述的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):648-659. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz164.
10
Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review.调查孟加拉国循证卫生决策制定过程:系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):469-478. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz044.