• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥实施老年肿瘤学原则的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。

Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Geriatric Oncology Principles in Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Hemato-Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100390. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00390.

DOI:10.1200/GO.21.00390
PMID:35353596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9005260/
Abstract

PURPOSE

There is limited information regarding the use of the geriatric assessment (GA) for older adults with cancer in developing countries. We aimed to describe geriatric oncology practice among Mexican oncology professionals and to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of GA into the routine care of older adults with cancer in Mexico.

METHODS

We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. We administered an online survey to cancer specialists in Mexico about the routine use of GA and barriers for its use. We then conducted online semistructured interviews with survey respondents selected by their use of GA, expanding on barriers and facilitators for performing GA. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed for quantitative data; qualitative data were analyzed inductively through thematic analysis. We developed joint displays to integrate quantitative/qualitative results.

RESULTS

We obtained 196 survey responses: 37 physicians (18.9%) reported routinely performing a GA. Medical oncologists ( = .002) and physicians seeing ≤ 10 patients/day ( = .010) were more likely to use GA. The most frequent barriers for GA use were lack of qualified personnel (49%), limited knowledge (43.9%), and insufficient time (37.2%). In the interviews (n = 22), the limited availability of geriatricians was commonly mentioned. Respondents highlighted the lack of geriatric oncology knowledge among cancer specialists and geriatricians. Saturation of oncology services and a lack of effective referral pathways for GA were also common issues. Facilitators included availability of geriatricians, system/administrative facilitators, presence of a multidisciplinary team, and availability of geriatric oncology education.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of geriatric oncology principles in Mexico is limited by the availability of qualified personnel and by insufficient knowledge. An educational intervention could improve the implementation of GA in cancer care.

摘要

目的

有关发展中国家老年癌症患者使用老年评估(GA)的信息有限。我们旨在描述墨西哥肿瘤学专业人员的老年肿瘤学实践,并确定在墨西哥将 GA 纳入老年癌症患者常规护理的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们进行了一项解释性序贯混合方法研究。我们向墨西哥的癌症专家发放了一份关于 GA 的常规使用以及使用障碍的在线调查。然后,我们根据使用 GA 的情况,对调查对象进行了在线半结构化访谈,进一步探讨了进行 GA 的障碍和促进因素。对定量数据进行描述性统计分析;对定性数据进行归纳分析,通过主题分析进行分析。我们开发了联合展示,以整合定量/定性结果。

结果

我们共获得 196 份调查回复:37 名医生(18.9%)报告常规进行 GA。进行医学肿瘤学(P =.002)和每天看诊≤10 名患者的医生(P =.010)更有可能使用 GA。GA 使用的最常见障碍是缺乏合格人员(49%)、知识有限(43.9%)和时间不足(37.2%)。在访谈(n = 22)中,经常提到老年科医生的可用性有限。受访者强调癌症专家和老年科医生缺乏老年肿瘤学知识。肿瘤学服务的饱和以及 GA 缺乏有效的转介途径也是常见问题。促进因素包括老年科医生的可用性、系统/行政促进因素、多学科团队的存在以及老年肿瘤学教育的可用性。

结论

在墨西哥,老年肿瘤学原则的常规使用受到合格人员的可用性和知识不足的限制。教育干预可能会改善癌症护理中 GA 的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1168/9005260/3a60cada6880/go-8-e2100390-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1168/9005260/3a60cada6880/go-8-e2100390-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1168/9005260/3a60cada6880/go-8-e2100390-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Geriatric Oncology Principles in Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study.墨西哥实施老年肿瘤学原则的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100390. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00390.
2
Oncology care providers' perceptions and anticipated barriers regarding the use of geriatric assessment in routine clinic practice: A mixed-methods study.肿瘤学护理提供者对在常规临床实践中使用老年综合评估的看法和预期障碍:一项混合方法研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 May;15(4):101768. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101768. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
Factors associated with the evaluation of geriatric assessment (GA) domains by oncology specialists in Mexico.墨西哥肿瘤专家对老年评估(GA)领域进行评估的相关因素。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 Aug 31;17:1597. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1597. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and Implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Interdisciplinary Case-Based Educational Intervention for Cancer Care Providers.老年肿瘤多学科基于案例的教育干预在癌症护理提供者中的开发和实施。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Oct;10:e2400258. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00258. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Utilisation of geriatric assessment in oncology - a survey of Australian medical oncologists.老年综合评估在肿瘤学中的应用——澳大利亚肿瘤内科医生的调查。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
6
Capacity to Provide Geriatric Specialty Care for Older Adults in Community Oncology Practices.社区肿瘤医疗实践中为老年人提供老年专科护理的能力。
Oncologist. 2020 Dec;25(12):1032-1038. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0189. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Geriatric oncology in the Netherlands: a survey of medical oncology specialists and oncology nursing specialists.荷兰的老年肿瘤学:医学肿瘤学专家和肿瘤学护理专家的一项调查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Nov;23(6):803-10. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12193. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
8
International efforts in geriatric radiation oncology.老年放射肿瘤学的国际合作努力。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(3):356-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
9
A Belgian Survey on Geriatric Assessment in Oncology Focusing on Large-Scale Implementation and Related Barriers and Facilitators.一项关于肿瘤学老年评估的比利时调查,重点关注大规模实施以及相关障碍和促进因素。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016 Jan;20(1):60-70. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0677-2.
10
Barriers and facilitators to implementing geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice in Japan: A qualitative study using an implementation framework.在日本日常肿瘤学实践中实施老年评估的障碍和促进因素:使用实施框架的定性研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Nov;14(8):101625. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101625. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Geriatric assessment for the practicing clinician: The why, what, and how.老年综合评估:临床医生的为何、何为及如何做。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Nov-Dec;74(6):496-518. doi: 10.3322/caac.21864. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Geriatric Oncology: A 5-Year Strategic Plan.老年肿瘤学:5 年战略计划。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024 Jun;44(3):e100044. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_100044.
3
Caring for older adults with cancer in Canada: Views from healthcare providers and cancer care allies in the community.在加拿大照顾癌症老年患者:来自社区医护提供者和癌症护理盟友的观点。

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study.老年综合评估和管理对癌症治疗毒性作用的评估(GAP70+):一项集群随机研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1894-1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01789-X. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Geriatric Assessment-Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.老年综合评估驱动干预(GAIN)对癌症老年患者化疗相关毒性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):e214158. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4158. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO).
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;32(3):157. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08303-3.
4
Implementation of a nurse-led, multidisciplinary model of care for older adults with cancer: a process evaluation protocol.实施以护士为主导、多学科合作的老年癌症患者护理模式:过程评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e077005. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077005.
5
Factors associated with the evaluation of geriatric assessment (GA) domains by oncology specialists in Mexico.墨西哥肿瘤专家对老年评估(GA)领域进行评估的相关因素。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 Aug 31;17:1597. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1597. eCollection 2023.
6
Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study).老年转移性结直肠癌患者的可切除性、切除术、生存结果及生活质量(RAXO研究)
J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103541.
7
Lessons learned from organizing International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) geriatric assessment workshops.从组织国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)老年评估研讨会中吸取的经验教训。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Jun;14(5):101528. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101528. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Geriatric Oncology in Portugal: Where We Are and What Comes Next-A Survey of Healthcare Professionals.葡萄牙的老年肿瘤学:我们的现状与未来——医疗保健专业人员调查
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;7(5):91. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050091.
老年干预对接受结直肠癌化疗的虚弱老年患者的影响:一项随机试验(GERICO)。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jun;124(12):1949-1958. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01367-0. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Geriatric oncology in Mexico.墨西哥的老年肿瘤学。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Sep 15;14:1102. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1102. eCollection 2020.
5
How Is Geriatric Assessment Used in Clinical Practice for Older Adults With Cancer? A Survey of Cancer Providers by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.老年综合评估在癌症老年患者临床实践中的应用如何?美国临床肿瘤学会对癌症提供者的调查。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jun;17(6):336-344. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00442. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Implementation of geriatric assessment in oncology settings: A systematic realist review.肿瘤学环境中老年人评估的实施:一项系统的现实主义综述。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Jan;12(1):22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
7
The Globalization of Geriatric Oncology: From Data to Practice.老年肿瘤学的全球化:从数据到实践。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 Mar;40:1-9. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_279513.
8
Communication With Older Patients With Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial From the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program.使用老年综合评估与老年癌症患者沟通:一项来自美国国家癌症研究所社区肿瘤研究计划的集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):196-204. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4728.
9
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Oncology: Best Practices in Caring for Older Patients.肿瘤学中的综合老年评估:照顾老年患者的最佳实践。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2018 Sep-Oct;9(6):640-644. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.