• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文肺癌筛查健康信念量表的汉化及信效度检验。

Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y
PMID:35354440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8969234/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health belief is an important factor affecting lung cancer screening in high-risk population, but the research based on Chinese cultural background is still insufficient. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales (LCSHB) into the Chinese version (LCSHB-C) and examined its psychometric characteristics.

METHODS

After obtaining authorization from the original author, the LCSHB-C was adapted based upon Brislin's translation model. Using a variety of community-based recruitment methods, a total of 353 participants were recruited in Fuzhou, Fujian province, China to complete the questionnaires. We combined the classical test theory and item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of the LCSHB-C.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha for the four subscales ranged from 0.83 ~ 0.93. The content validity index for the four subscales was ranged from 0.87 ~ 1.0. Confirmatory factor analysis supported each subscale structure model fit well. Rasch analysis results further validated the reliability and validity of the four subscales. The person reliability and separation index of each subscale ranged from 0.77 to 0.87 and 1.83 to 2.63, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCSHB-C is a reliable and valid instrument used to measure health beliefs related to lung cancer screening among those high-risk for lung cancer in China, which facilitates the development of lung cancer screening programs and promotes the "three early prevention strategies" of lung cancer (i.e.,early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment).

摘要

背景

健康信念是影响高危人群肺癌筛查的一个重要因素,但基于中国文化背景的研究仍然不足。因此,我们将英文版的肺癌筛查健康信念量表(LCSHB)改编为中文版(LCSHB-C),并检验其心理测量学特性。

方法

在获得原作者授权后,我们根据 Brislin 的翻译模型对 LCSHB-C 进行了改编。采用多种社区招募方法,共招募了 353 名来自中国福建省福州市的参与者完成问卷。我们结合经典测量理论和项目反应理论来检验 LCSHB-C 的心理测量特性。

结果

四个分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值范围为 0.83 至 0.93。四个分量表的内容效度指数范围为 0.87 至 1.0。验证性因子分析支持每个分量表的结构模型拟合良好。Rasch 分析结果进一步验证了四个分量表的可靠性和有效性。每个分量表的个体可靠性和分离指数范围分别为 0.77 至 0.87 和 1.83 至 2.63。

结论

LCSHB-C 是一种可靠有效的工具,用于测量中国高危人群与肺癌筛查相关的健康信念,有助于肺癌筛查计划的制定,并促进肺癌的“三早”预防策略(即早期发现、早期诊断和早期治疗)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d3/8969234/1ccfd6847d8c/12889_2022_13041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d3/8969234/9f17199c96df/12889_2022_13041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d3/8969234/1ccfd6847d8c/12889_2022_13041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d3/8969234/9f17199c96df/12889_2022_13041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d3/8969234/1ccfd6847d8c/12889_2022_13041_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the lung cancer screening health belief scales.中文肺癌筛查健康信念量表的汉化及信效度检验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13041-y.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
Turkish translation and adaptation of Champion's Health Belief Model Scales for breast cancer mammography screening.《冠军健康信念模型量表》用于乳腺癌乳房X线筛查的土耳其语翻译及改编。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):1978-89. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12370. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
5
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of four-factor colorectal cancer screening belief scale.中文版四因素结直肠癌筛查信念量表的心理测量学特性
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 May 15;9(9):100081. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100081. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Instrument Adaptation, Modification, and Validation for Cultural Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Korean Americans.针对韩裔美国人对结直肠癌筛查的文化观念进行仪器适配、修改和验证。
Cancer Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;41(3):E38-E48. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000523.
8
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for colorectal cancer screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的波斯语版冠军健康信念模型量表的心理测量学特性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4595-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4595.
9
Translation, Trans-Cultural Adaptation to Arabic, and Psychometric Testing of a Questionnaire Measuring Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Perceptions, and Screening Practices among Average-Risk Population.将问卷翻译成阿拉伯文,并对其进行跨文化适应性调整,该问卷用于测量一般风险人群的结直肠癌知识、认知和筛查实践。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 May 1;22(5):1537-1545. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.5.1537.
10
Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form Scale for Chinese Diabetic Foot Ulcers Individuals.中文糖尿病足溃疡量表-简表的适应与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 6;19(21):14568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114568.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' Voices of Lung Cancer Screening in Hong Kong: Study Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.香港肺癌筛查中利益相关者的声音:一项混合方法研究的研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):142. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020142.
2
Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption.为什么肺癌筛查率仍然较低?影响采用因素的七国分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1264342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264342. eCollection 2023.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation planning for lung cancer screening in China.中国肺癌筛查的实施规划。
Precis Clin Med. 2019 Mar;2(1):13-44. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbz002. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
3
Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing.利用众包评估肺癌筛查的知识、态度和信念。
《肺癌筛查健康信念量表韩文版的信效度研究》
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 23;11(11):1525. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111525.
4
Investigation on the incidence and risk factors of lung cancer among Chinese hospital employees.中国医院职工肺癌发病率及危险因素调查。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Aug;13(15):2210-2222. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14549. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.048. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis.了解是否进行肺癌筛查的决策:一项定性分析。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1314-1321. doi: 10.1111/hex.12975. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis.运用路径分析理解肺癌筛查行为。
J Med Screen. 2020 Jun;27(2):105-112. doi: 10.1177/0969141319876961. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
[Results of Lung Cancer Screening among Urban Residents in Kunming].[昆明市城市居民肺癌筛查结果]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 20;22(7):413-418. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2019.07.02.
7
Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography.低剂量计算机断层扫描用于肺癌筛查的障碍
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):E60-E71. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.E60-E71.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.肺癌筛查,版本 3.2018,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Apr;16(4):412-441. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0020.
10
The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings.中国版猫科动物问卷-9SF:在社区筛查中的验证与应用
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0.