文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

办公室工作人员对体力活动和久坐行为的看法:一项定性研究。

Office workers' perspectives on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Collaboration On Health & Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13024-z.


DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13024-z
PMID:35354447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8966601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Office workers spend a significant part of their workday sitting. Interventions that aim to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity might be more effective if greater attention is paid to individual perspectives that influence behavioural choices, including beliefs and values. This study aimed to gain insight into office workers' perspectives on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. METHODS: Sixteen Dutch office workers (50% female) from different professions participated in semi-structured face-to-face interviews in March 2019. To facilitate the interviews, participants received a sensitizing booklet one week before the interview. The booklet aimed to trigger them to reflect on their physical activity and sedentary behaviour and on their values in life. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and coded following codebook thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six themes were identified: 1) beliefs about health effects are specific regarding physical activity, but superficial regarding sedentary behaviour; 2) in addition to 'health' as a value, other values are also given priority; 3) motivations to engage in physical activity mainly stem from prioritizing the value 'health', reflected by a desire to both achieve positive short/mid-term outcomes and to prevent long-term negative outcomes; 4) attitudes towards physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are diverse and depend on individual values and previous experiences; 5) perceived barriers depend on internal and external factors; 6) supporting factors are related to support and information in the social and physical environment. CONCLUSIONS: The great value that office workers attach to health is reflected in their motivations and attitudes regarding physical activity. Increasing office workers' knowledge of the health risks of prolonged sitting may therefore increase their motivation to sit less. Although 'health' is considered important, other values, including social and work-related values, are sometimes prioritized. We conclude that interventions that aim to reduce sedentary behaviour and increase physical activity among office workers could be improved by informing about health effects of sedentary behaviour and short/mid-term benefits of physical activity, including mental health benefits. Moreover, interventions could frame physical activity as congruent with values and support value-congruent choices. Finally, the work environment could support physical activity and interruption of sedentary behaviour.

摘要

背景:上班族在工作日的大部分时间里都坐着。如果更关注影响行为选择的个人观点,包括信念和价值观,那么旨在减少久坐行为和增加身体活动的干预措施可能会更有效。本研究旨在深入了解上班族对身体活动和久坐行为的看法。

方法:2019 年 3 月,来自不同职业的 16 名荷兰上班族(50%为女性)参加了半结构化的面对面访谈。为了方便访谈,参与者在访谈前一周收到了一本启蒙小册子。这本小册子旨在促使他们反思自己的身体活动和久坐行为以及自己的生活价值观。所有访谈均进行了录音、逐字转录,并按照代码簿主题分析进行了编码。

结果:确定了六个主题:1)关于健康影响的信念是针对身体活动的,但针对久坐行为的信念是肤浅的;2)除了“健康”作为一种价值观外,其他价值观也被优先考虑;3)从事身体活动的动机主要源于将“健康”作为一种优先价值观,这反映了既渴望实现短期/中期积极结果,又渴望预防长期负面结果的愿望;4)对身体不活动和久坐行为的态度是多种多样的,取决于个人价值观和以往经验;5)感知到的障碍取决于内部和外部因素;6)支持因素与社会和物理环境中的支持和信息有关。

结论:上班族非常重视健康,这反映在他们对身体活动的动机和态度上。因此,增加上班族对长时间坐着对健康危害的认识可能会增加他们减少久坐的动机。虽然“健康”被认为很重要,但其他价值观,包括社会和工作相关的价值观,有时也会被优先考虑。我们的结论是,旨在减少上班族久坐行为和增加身体活动的干预措施可以通过告知久坐行为的健康影响和身体活动的短期/中期益处(包括心理健康益处)来得到改善。此外,干预措施可以将身体活动框定为与价值观一致,并支持符合价值观的选择。最后,工作环境可以支持身体活动和中断久坐行为。

相似文献

[1]
Office workers' perspectives on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a qualitative study.

BMC Public Health. 2022-3-30

[2]
Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time: a qualitative study with Australian office workers.

BMC Public Health. 2016-9-5

[3]
Office workers' experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study.

BMC Public Health. 2019-6-25

[4]
Improving office workers' mental health and cognition: a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in multi-component interventions.

BMC Public Health. 2019-3-5

[5]
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-8-14

[6]
"They should stay at their desk until the work's done": a qualitative study examining perceptions of sedentary behaviour in a desk-based occupational setting.

BMC Res Notes. 2015-11-17

[7]
How do office workers respond to media coverage of sitting?

Occup Med (Lond). 2019-8-22

[8]
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers' perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017-5-30

[9]
A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

J Physiother. 2017-5-16

[10]
Breaking barriers: using the behavior change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome workplace inhibitors to breaking up sitting time.

BMC Public Health. 2019-8-16

引用本文的文献

[1]
Barriers and facilitators to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in Ethiopian office-based employees: a qualitative formative research using the social-ecological model.

J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2025-8-1

[2]
Factors influencing reducing sedentary time in home office employees.

Sci Rep. 2025-7-6

[3]
Initial co-ideation phase of a shared decision-making tool aimed at promoting physical activity in primary care: views expressed by patients, academics, and healthcare professionals.

Front Public Health. 2025-5-30

[4]
An umbrella review of efficacy of digital health interventions for workers.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-4-14

[5]
Strategies and barriers to implementing physically active teaching in universities from the perspective of lecturers: a qualitative study.

BMC Public Health. 2025-3-4

[6]
Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention?

J Occup Health. 2024-1-4

[7]
A profile approach to physical activity levels: what's intensity got to do with reasons and motives for exercise?

BMC Public Health. 2024-10-29

[8]
"Balancing work and movement": barriers and enablers for being physically active at Indian workplaces - findings from SMART STEP trial.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024-9-27

[9]
PEAK Mood, Mind, and Marks: a pilot study of an intervention to support university students' mental and cognitive health through physical exercise.

Front Psychiatry. 2024-6-10

[10]
Exploring the perspectives of older adults who are pre-frail and frail to identify interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and improve mobility: a thematic content analysis.

BMC Public Health. 2024-6-13

本文引用的文献

[1]
Joint associations of accelero-meter measured physical activity and sedentary time with all-cause mortality: a harmonised meta-analysis in more than 44 000 middle-aged and older individuals.

Br J Sports Med. 2020-12

[2]
New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020-11-26

[3]
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.

PLoS One. 2020-5-29

[4]
Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020-4-15

[5]
Choice architecture interventions to change physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of effects on intention, behavior and health outcomes during and after intervention.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020-4-7

[6]
Development and evaluation of a physical activity intervention informed by participatory research- a feasibility study.

BMC Public Health. 2020-1-28

[7]
Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-12-18

[8]
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-8-14

[9]
Sitting Time, Physical Activity, and Risk of Mortality in Adults.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019-4-30

[10]
Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019-4-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索