Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Room number F02.318, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Graduate School of Life Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2022 Jun;19(3):136-145. doi: 10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
The prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is increasing due to improved cancer survival. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is essential to detect CTRCD, guiding timely intervention strategies. Multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA) has been the main screening tool using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to monitor cardiac dysfunction. However, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be more suitable for serial assessment. We aimed to assess the concordance between different non-radiating imaging modalities with MUGA to determine whether they can be used interchangeably.
In order to identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed. We included cross-sectional studies comparing MUGA LVEF to that of 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR. From 470 articles, 22 were selected, comprising 1017 patients in total. Among others, this included three 3D TTE, seven 2D harmonic TTE + contrast (2DHC), and seven CMR comparisons. The correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement varied for CMR but were stronger for 3D TTE and 2DHC. Our findings suggest that MUGA and CMR should not be used interchangeably whereas 3D TTE and 2DHC are appropriate alternatives following an initial MUGA scan. We propose a multimodality diagnostic imaging strategy for LVEF monitoring in patients undergoing cancer treatment.
由于癌症患者存活率的提高,癌症治疗相关心功能障碍(CTRCD)的发病率不断上升。连续监测心功能对于检测 CTRCD 至关重要,并指导及时的干预策略。门控放射性核素血管造影(MUGA)一直是使用左心室射血分数(LVEF)监测心功能障碍的主要筛查工具。然而,经胸超声心动图(TTE)和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)可能更适合进行连续评估。我们旨在评估不同非放射性成像方式与 MUGA 的一致性,以确定它们是否可以互换使用。
为了确定相关研究,我们对 PubMed 进行了检索。我们纳入了比较 MUGA LVEF 与 2D TTE、3D TTE 和 CMR 的横断面研究。从 470 篇文章中,我们选择了 22 篇,共纳入 1017 例患者。其中包括 3 项 3D TTE、7 项 2D 谐波 TTE + 对比剂(2DHC)和 7 项 CMR 比较。CMR 的相关性和 Bland-Altman 一致性界限存在差异,但 3D TTE 和 2DHC 的相关性更强。我们的研究结果表明,MUGA 和 CMR 不应互换使用,而 3D TTE 和 2DHC 可作为初始 MUGA 扫描后的替代方法。我们提出了一种多模态诊断成像策略,用于监测接受癌症治疗患者的 LVEF。