Safar Kristina, Vandewouw Marlee M, Pang Elizabeth W, de Villa Kathrina, Crosbie Jennifer, Schachar Russell, Iaboni Alana, Georgiades Stelios, Nicolson Robert, Kelley Elizabeth, Ayub Muhammed, Lerch Jason P, Anagnostou Evdokia, Taylor Margot J
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Program in Neurosciences & Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:826527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826527. eCollection 2022.
Impairments in emotional face processing are demonstrated by individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is associated with altered emotion processing networks. Despite accumulating evidence of high rates of diagnostic overlap and shared symptoms between ASD and ADHD, functional connectivity underpinning emotion processing across these two neurodevelopmental disorders, compared to typical developing peers, has rarely been examined. The current study used magnetoencephalography to investigate whole-brain functional connectivity during the presentation of happy and angry faces in 258 children (5-19 years), including ASD, ADHD and typically developing (TD) groups to determine possible differences in emotion processing. Data-driven clustering was also applied to determine whether the patterns of connectivity differed among diagnostic groups. We found reduced functional connectivity in the beta band in ASD compared to TD, and a further reduction in the ADHD group compared to the ASD and the TD groups, across emotions. A group-by-emotion interaction in the gamma frequency band was also observed. Greater connectivity to happy compared to angry faces was found in the ADHD and TD groups, while the opposite pattern was seen in ASD. Data-driven subgrouping identified two distinct subgroups: NDD-dominant and TD-dominant; these subgroups demonstrated emotion- and frequency-specific differences in connectivity. Atypicalities in specific brain networks were strongly correlated with the severity of diagnosis-specific symptoms. Functional connectivity strength in the beta network was negatively correlated with difficulties in attention; in the gamma network, functional connectivity strength to happy faces was positively correlated with adaptive behavioural functioning, but in contrast, negatively correlated to angry faces. Our findings establish atypical frequency- and emotion-specific patterns of functional connectivity between NDD and TD children. Data-driven clustering further highlights a high degree of comorbidity and symptom overlap between the ASD and ADHD children.
患有神经发育障碍(NDDs)的个体,包括自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),表现出情绪面孔加工受损,这与情绪加工网络的改变有关。尽管有越来越多的证据表明ASD和ADHD之间存在高诊断重叠率和共同症状,但与典型发育的同龄人相比,这两种神经发育障碍中支持情绪加工的功能连接很少被研究。本研究使用脑磁图来调查258名儿童(5 - 19岁)在呈现快乐和愤怒面孔时的全脑功能连接,这些儿童包括ASD组、ADHD组和典型发育(TD)组,以确定情绪加工中可能存在的差异。还应用了数据驱动聚类来确定诊断组之间的连接模式是否不同。我们发现,与TD组相比,ASD组在β波段的功能连接减少,与ASD组和TD组相比,ADHD组的功能连接进一步减少,且涉及所有情绪。在γ频段还观察到了组 - 情绪交互作用。在ADHD组和TD组中,与愤怒面孔相比,与快乐面孔的连接更强,而在ASD组中则观察到相反的模式。数据驱动的亚组分析确定了两个不同的亚组:以NDD为主的亚组和以TD为主的亚组;这些亚组在连接性上表现出情绪和频率特异性差异。特定脑网络中的异常与特定诊断症状的严重程度密切相关。β网络中的功能连接强度与注意力困难呈负相关;在γ网络中,与快乐面孔的功能连接强度与适应性行为功能呈正相关,但与愤怒面孔呈负相关。我们的研究结果确定了NDD儿童和TD儿童之间非典型的频率和情绪特异性功能连接模式。数据驱动聚类进一步凸显了ASD儿童和ADHD儿童之间的高度共病性和症状重叠。