Department of Pedagogy, Psychology and Didactics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Kinanthropology and Humanities, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205222. eCollection 2018.
Although performance-enhancing drugs appear to be prevalent in adolescent sports, relatively little attention has been paid to why adolescent athletes decide to use these drugs. In this study, we examine doping among adolescents from a motivational perspective and explore how motivational variables, such as achievement goal orientations and the perceived self-determination of sports activities, may be related to moral attitudes, doping intentions and doping behavior in adolescents who participate in competitive sports.
The study included 1035 adolescents participating in competitive sports from all regions of the Czech Republic (mean age = 16.3 years). The respondents completed a battery of questionnaires assessing their achievement goal orientations (task, ego), sports motivation at various levels of self-determination (intrinsic motivation, external regulation, amotivation), moral attitudes toward sport competition (acceptance of cheating, keeping winning in proportion, attitudes toward doping), doping intentions and doping behavior. A structural equation model was used to test the relations among motivational variables, attitudes, intentions and doping behavior.
Our analyses indicated a good fit with the proposed model, which explained 59% of the variance in doping intentions and 17.6% of the variance in doping behavior. Within the model, task orientation was positively associated with intrinsic motivation and lower amotivation, whereas ego orientation was positively associated with extrinsic regulation and amotivation. Furthermore, intrinsic motivation was positively associated with keeping winning in proportion and negatively associated with acceptance of cheating and attitudes toward doping; the less self-determined forms of motivation showed opposite relationships. However, only the acceptance of cheating and attitudes toward doping were related to doping intention, which subsequently predicted doping behavior.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results provide further evidence that sports motivation represents a psychological variable that should be considered in anti-doping policies, programs, and interventions aimed at the adolescent population because motivation was linked to the doping-related attitudinal variables and also partially mediated the effect of achievement goal orientations in this regard. On the basis of these results, we may argue that the focus on intrinsic enjoyment, self-referenced criteria of success and self-improvement may be related to more negative attitudes toward doping and cheating, lower doping intentions and less frequent doping behavior, whereas the emphasis on competition, comparison with others and external motivation appear to be related to the opposite outcomes.
尽管在青少年运动中似乎普遍存在使用兴奋剂的现象,但相对较少关注青少年运动员决定使用这些药物的原因。在这项研究中,我们从动机的角度研究青少年兴奋剂问题,并探讨成就目标取向和感知运动活动的自我决定等动机变量如何与道德态度、青少年竞技运动员的兴奋剂意图和兴奋剂行为相关。
该研究包括来自捷克共和国所有地区的 1035 名参加竞技运动的青少年(平均年龄=16.3 岁)。被试完成了一系列问卷,评估他们的成就目标取向(任务、自我)、不同自我决定水平的运动动机(内在动机、外部调节、无动机)、对运动竞赛的道德态度(接受作弊、保持与比例相称的胜利、对兴奋剂的态度)、兴奋剂意图和兴奋剂行为。使用结构方程模型检验动机变量、态度、意图和兴奋剂行为之间的关系。
我们的分析表明,该模型与所提出的模型拟合良好,该模型解释了 59%的兴奋剂意图和 17.6%的兴奋剂行为的方差。在模型中,任务取向与内在动机和较低的无动机呈正相关,而自我取向与外部调节和无动机呈正相关。此外,内在动机与保持与比例相称的胜利呈正相关,与接受作弊和对兴奋剂的态度呈负相关;自我决定程度较低的动机形式则表现出相反的关系。然而,只有接受作弊和对兴奋剂的态度与兴奋剂意图相关,而兴奋剂意图随后预测了兴奋剂行为。
结论/意义:研究结果进一步证明,运动动机是反兴奋剂政策、计划和干预措施针对青少年人群时应考虑的心理变量,因为动机与与兴奋剂相关的态度变量有关,并且在这方面部分中介了成就目标取向的影响。基于这些结果,我们可以认为,强调内在享受、自我参照的成功标准和自我提升可能与对兴奋剂和作弊的更负面态度、较低的兴奋剂意图和较少的兴奋剂行为有关,而强调竞争、与他人比较和外部动机则可能与相反的结果有关。