Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;10:844560. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.844560. eCollection 2022.
Governments across the world have deployed a wide range of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Certain NPIs, like limiting social contacts or lockdowns, had negative consequences for mental health in the population. Especially elder people are prone to mental illnesses during the current pandemic. This article investigates how social factors, infections rates, and stringency of NPIs are associated with a decline in mental health in different European countries.
Data stem from the eighth wave of the SHARE survey. Additional data sources were used to build macro indicators for infection rates and NPIs. Two subsamples of persons with mental health problems were selected (people who reported being depressed, = 9.240 or nervous/anxious, = 10.551). Decline in mental health was assessed by asking whether depressive symptoms or nervousness/anxiety have become worse since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. For each outcome, logistic regression models with survey-design were used to estimate odds ratios (OR), using social factors (age, gender, education, living alone, and personal contacts) and macro indicators (stringency of NPIs and infection rates) as predictors.
Higher age was associated with a lower likelihood of becoming more depressed (OR 0.87) or nervous/anxious (OR 0.88), while female gender increased the odds of a decline in mental health (OR 1.53 for being more depressed; OR 1.57 for being more nervous/anxious). Higher education was only associated with becoming more nervous/anxious (OR 1.59), while living alone or rare personal contacts were not statistically significant. People from countries with higher infection rates were more likely to become more depressed (OR 3.31) or nervous/anxious (OR 4.12), while stringency of NPIs showed inconsistent associations.
A majority of European older adults showed a decline in mental health since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. This is especially true in countries with high prevalence rates of COVID-19. Among older European adults, age seems to be a protective factor for a decline in mental health while female gender apparently is a risk factor. Moreover, although NPIs are an essential preventative mechanism to reduce the pandemic spread, they might influence the vulnerability for elderly people suffering from mental health problems.
世界各地的政府已经部署了广泛的非药物干预措施(NPI)来减轻 COVID-19 的传播。某些 NPI,如限制社交接触或封锁,对民众的心理健康产生了负面影响。特别是老年人在当前大流行期间更容易患上精神疾病。本文研究了社会因素、感染率和 NPI 的严格程度如何与不同欧洲国家心理健康的下降相关联。
数据来自 SHARE 调查的第八波。还使用了其他数据源来构建感染率和 NPI 的宏观指标。选择了两个有心理健康问题的人员样本(报告抑郁的人,=9.240 或紧张/焦虑的人,=10.551)。通过询问抑郁症状或紧张/焦虑是否自 COVID-19 爆发以来变得更糟来评估心理健康的下降。对于每个结果,使用具有调查设计的逻辑回归模型来估计优势比(OR),使用社会因素(年龄、性别、教育、独居和个人接触)和宏观指标(NPI 的严格程度和感染率)作为预测因子。
较高的年龄与不太可能变得更加抑郁(OR 0.87)或紧张/焦虑(OR 0.88)相关,而女性性别增加了心理健康下降的几率(更抑郁的 OR 1.53;更紧张/焦虑的 OR 1.57)。较高的教育水平仅与变得更加紧张/焦虑有关(OR 1.59),而独居或很少的个人接触则没有统计学意义。感染率较高的国家的人更有可能变得更加抑郁(OR 3.31)或紧张/焦虑(OR 4.12),而 NPI 的严格程度则显示出不一致的关联。
自 COVID-19 爆发以来,大多数欧洲老年人的心理健康状况有所下降。在 COVID-19 患病率较高的国家,这种情况更为明显。在欧洲老年人中,年龄似乎是心理健康下降的保护因素,而女性性别显然是一个风险因素。此外,虽然 NPI 是减少大流行传播的重要预防机制,但它们可能会影响患有心理健康问题的老年人的脆弱性。