Suppr超能文献

闭环脑训练治疗内化性障碍的特异性是否有证据?一项系统综述。

Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Perez Tyson Michael, Mathew Jerin, Glue Paul, Adhia Divya B, De Ridder Dirk

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 10;16:821136. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.821136. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Internalizing disorders (IDs), e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are the most prevalent psychopathologies experienced worldwide. Current first-line therapies (i.e., pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) offer high failure rates, limited accessibility, and substantial side-effects. Electroencephalography (EEG) guided closed-loop brain training, also known as EEG-neurofeedback (EEG-NFB), is believed to be a safe and effective alternative, however, there is much debate in the field regarding the existence of specificity [i.e., clinical effects specific to the modulation of the targeted EEG variable(s)]. This review was undertaken to determine if there is evidence for EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs.

METHODS

We considered only randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials. Outcomes of interest included self/parent/teacher reports and clinician ratings of ID-related symptomatology.

RESULTS

Of the four reports (total participant number = 152) meeting our eligibility criteria, three had point estimates suggesting small to moderate effect sizes favoring genuine therapy over sham, however, due to small sample sizes, all 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were wide and spanned the null. The fourth trial had yet to post results as of the submission date of this review. The limited overall number of eligible reports (and participants), large degree of inter-trial heterogeneity, and restricted span of ID populations with published/posted outcome data (i.e., PTSD and OCD) precluded a quantitative synthesis.

DISCUSSION

The current literature suggests that EEG-NFB may induce specific effects in the treatment of some forms of IDs, however, the evidence is very limited. Ultimately, more randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials encompassing a wider array of ID populations are needed to determine the existence and, if present, degree of EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42020159702].

摘要

引言

内化性障碍(IDs),例如重度抑郁症(MDD)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、强迫症(OCD),是全球范围内最普遍的精神病理学问题。当前的一线治疗方法(即药物治疗和/或心理治疗)存在高失败率、可及性有限以及大量副作用等问题。脑电图(EEG)引导的闭环脑训练,也称为EEG神经反馈(EEG-NFB),被认为是一种安全有效的替代方法,然而,该领域对于特异性的存在(即针对目标EEG变量调制的临床效果)存在诸多争议。本综述旨在确定EEG-NFB在IDs治疗中是否具有特异性的证据。

方法

我们仅考虑随机、双盲、假对照试验。感兴趣的结果包括自我/父母/教师报告以及临床医生对ID相关症状的评分。

结果

在符合我们纳入标准的四项报告(总参与者数量 = 152)中,三项报告的点估计表明真实治疗相对于假治疗有小到中等的效应大小,然而,由于样本量小,所有95%置信区间(CIs)都很宽且包含无效值。截至本综述提交日期,第四项试验尚未公布结果。符合条件的报告(和参与者)总数有限、试验间异质性程度高以及有已发表/公布结果数据的ID人群范围受限(即PTSD和OCD),使得无法进行定量综合分析。

讨论

当前文献表明,EEG-NFB在某些形式的IDs治疗中可能会产生特定效果,然而,证据非常有限。最终,需要更多随机、双盲、假对照试验,涵盖更广泛的ID人群,以确定EEG-NFB在IDs治疗中的特异性是否存在,以及如果存在,其程度如何。

系统评价注册

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero],标识符[CRD42020159702]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a32/8960197/6694b3a1f4dd/fnins-16-821136-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验