Murakami Takumi, Iijima Yuki, Ando Takahiro, Ejima Masaru, Shirai Tsuyoshi, Furusawa Haruhiko, Okamoto Tsukasa, Tateishi Tomoya, Tamaoka Meiyo, Miyazaki Yasunari
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Respir Med Case Rep. 2022 Mar 22;37:101639. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2022.101639. eCollection 2022.
A 52-year-old woman presented with repeating episodes of pneumonia which spontaneously resolved after hospitalization. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis was suspected, but the causative antigen was not determined whether the parakeets she kept or the humidifier she owned was causative exposure. To identify which exposure is culprit, individual provocation test to a responsible environment was sequentially conducted. First, a home-returning provocation test to the parakeet was negative. Contrarily, the humidifier provocation test to her own humidifier was positive for symptoms, radiological changes, and inflammatory responses in blood test. Finally, she was diagnosed as having humidifier lung. When several antigens are suspected to be the causative agents for hypersensitivity pneumonitis, a step-by-step provocation tests is useful.
一名52岁女性反复出现肺炎发作,住院后自行缓解。怀疑是过敏性肺炎,但未确定致病抗原,她饲养的长尾小鹦鹉或拥有的加湿器是否为致病暴露源。为确定哪种暴露源是罪魁祸首,依次对相关环境进行了个体激发试验。首先,对长尾小鹦鹉的回家激发试验结果为阴性。相反,对她自己的加湿器进行的加湿器激发试验在症状、影像学改变和血液检查中的炎症反应方面呈阳性。最后,她被诊断为加湿器肺。当怀疑有多种抗原是过敏性肺炎的致病因素时,逐步进行激发试验是有用的。