• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过高等教育中的服务学习探索不平等:一项文献计量学综述研究

Exploring Inequality Through Service Learning in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Review Study.

作者信息

Martínez-Heredia Nazaret, Corral-Robles Silvia, González-Gijón Gracia, Sánchez-Martín Micaela

机构信息

Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Department of Didactics of Language and Literature, Faculty of Education, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:826341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826341. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826341
PMID:35360607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8963505/
Abstract

Service learning (S-L) is an innovative methodology, which is extensively known worldwide. The implementation of this methodology involves classroom learning and real practice. It is based on a cooperative methodology, integrating community service and learning in a connected way. Its main strength lies in its great potential as a transformative social movement to reduce inequality. The main aim of this study was to understand and describe the field of S-L and inequality in higher education through a bibliometric analysis. A descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional methodology is used to describe the information obtained from the 20 references on the topic registered in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases using a mixed methodology. The quantitative and qualitative results show that most of the publications are concentrated in 2016, with the United States being the country with the largest amount of scientific production on this subject. It is also worth noting that most of the authors reported this approach as a powerful tool to develop consciousness, commitment, and responsibility toward inequality and social problems.

摘要

服务学习(S-L)是一种创新方法,在全球范围内广为人知。这种方法的实施涉及课堂学习和实际实践。它基于一种合作方法,以一种相互关联的方式将社区服务与学习结合起来。其主要优势在于它作为一种减少不平等的变革性社会运动具有巨大潜力。本研究的主要目的是通过文献计量分析来理解和描述高等教育中的服务学习领域与不平等现象。采用描述性、回顾性和横断面方法,运用混合方法描述从Scopus和科学网(WoS)数据库中注册的关于该主题的20篇参考文献中获得的信息。定量和定性结果表明,大多数出版物集中在2016年,美国是该主题科学产出量最大的国家。还值得注意的是,大多数作者将这种方法报告为培养对不平等和社会问题的意识、承诺和责任感的有力工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/c028a4e978bc/fpsyg-13-826341-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/43eb1ba5cf56/fpsyg-13-826341-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/9f8f841ba257/fpsyg-13-826341-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/32b15f63ef5b/fpsyg-13-826341-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/ce3b4b68d08b/fpsyg-13-826341-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/e0eb3d330624/fpsyg-13-826341-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/c028a4e978bc/fpsyg-13-826341-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/43eb1ba5cf56/fpsyg-13-826341-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/9f8f841ba257/fpsyg-13-826341-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/32b15f63ef5b/fpsyg-13-826341-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/ce3b4b68d08b/fpsyg-13-826341-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/e0eb3d330624/fpsyg-13-826341-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0534/8963505/c028a4e978bc/fpsyg-13-826341-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Inequality Through Service Learning in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Review Study.通过高等教育中的服务学习探索不平等:一项文献计量学综述研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:826341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826341. eCollection 2022.
2
The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study.Scopus和WoS上的文献计量学文献:以医学和环境科学类别为例进行研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 29;18(11):5851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115851.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Trends in Research on Art Therapy Indexed in the Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis.科学网收录的艺术治疗研究趋势:文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 19;12:752026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752026. eCollection 2021.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
A bibliometric analysis and literature review on emotional skills.关于情感技能的文献计量分析与文献综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 24;14:1040110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1040110. eCollection 2023.
7
Publication output of French orthopedic and trauma surgeons: Quantitative and qualitative bibliometric analysis of their scientific production in orthopedics and other medical fields.法国矫形外科和创伤外科医生的发表成果:矫形外科和其他医学领域科学产出的定量和定性文献计量分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8):1439-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
8
Conflict in nursing studies: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited papers.护理研究中的冲突:前 100 篇被引论文的文献计量分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Oct;76(10):2531-2546. doi: 10.1111/jan.14463. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
10
Older Adults and Digital Society: Scientific Coverage.老年人与数字社会:科学综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 5;16(11):2010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112010.

引用本文的文献

1
Global research trends of artificial intelligence applied in esophageal carcinoma: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2022) CiteSpace and VOSviewer.人工智能应用于食管癌的全球研究趋势:一项文献计量分析(2000 - 2022年) CiteSpace和VOSviewer
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;12:972357. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.972357. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Jump Shot Performance in Youth Basketball: A Systematic Review.青少年篮球中的跳跃投篮表现:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 22;18(6):3283. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063283.
2
Doctors and Nurses: A Systematic Review of the Risk and Protective Factors in Workplace Violence and Burnout.医生和护士:工作场所暴力和倦怠的风险和保护因素的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 22;18(6):3280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063280.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research.一项关于定性研究严谨性质量指标的综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7120.
5
[PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses].[PRISMA声明:一项改善系统评价和Meta分析报告质量的建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Oct 9;135(11):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Mar 5.