• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于新型机器学习的放射组学模型,用于诊断肝硬化患者的高出血风险食管静脉曲张。

A novel machine learning-based radiomic model for diagnosing high bleeding risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated With Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.

出版信息

Hepatol Int. 2022 Apr;16(2):423-432. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10292-6. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s12072-021-10292-6
PMID:35366193
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To develop and validate a novel machine learning-based radiomic model (RM) for diagnosing high bleeding risk esophageal varices (HREV) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 796 qualified participants were enrolled. In training cohort, 218 cirrhotic patients with mild esophageal varices (EV) and 240 with HREV RM were included to training and internal validation groups. Additionally, 159 and 340 cirrhotic patients with mild EV and HREV RM, respectively, were used for external validation. Interesting regions of liver, spleen, and esophagus were labeled on the portal venous-phase enhanced CT images. RM was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The AUROCs for mild EV RM in training and internal validation were 0.943 and 0.732, sensitivity and specificity were 0.863, 0.773 and 0.763, 0.763, respectively. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.654, 0.773 and 0.632, respectively, in external validation. Interestingly, the AUROCs for HREV RM in training and internal validation were 0.983 and 0.834, sensitivity and specificity were 0.948, 0.916 and 0.977, 0.969, respectively. The related AUROC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.736, 0.690 and 0.762 in external validation. Calibration and DCA indicated RM had good performance. Compared with Baveno VI and its expanded criteria, HREV RM had a higher accuracy and net reclassification improvements that were as high as 49.0% and 32.8%.

CONCLUSION

The present study developed a novel non-invasive RM for diagnosing HREV in cirrhotic patients with high accuracy. However, this RM still needs to be validated by a large multi-center cohort.

摘要

背景与目的

开发并验证一种基于机器学习的新型放射组学模型(RM),用于诊断肝硬化患者的高出血风险食管静脉曲张(HREV)。

方法

共纳入 796 名合格参与者。在训练队列中,纳入了 218 名肝硬化伴轻度食管静脉曲张(EV)患者和 240 名 HREV RM 患者,用于训练和内部验证组。此外,还分别纳入了 159 名和 340 名肝硬化伴轻度 EV 和 HREV RM 患者,用于外部验证。在门静脉期增强 CT 图像上标记感兴趣的肝脏、脾脏和食管区域。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度、特异性、校准和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估 RM。

结果

训练和内部验证中轻度 EV RM 的 AUROCs 分别为 0.943 和 0.732,灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.863、0.773 和 0.763、0.763。外部验证中 AUROC、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.654、0.773 和 0.632。有趣的是,训练和内部验证中 HREV RM 的 AUROCs 分别为 0.983 和 0.834,灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.948、0.916 和 0.977、0.969。外部验证中相关 AUROC、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.736、0.690 和 0.762。校准和 DCA 表明 RM 具有良好的性能。与 Baveno VI 及其扩展标准相比,HREV RM 的准确性更高,净重新分类改善高达 49.0%和 32.8%。

结论

本研究开发了一种新型的非侵入性 RM,用于诊断肝硬化患者的 HREV,具有较高的准确性。然而,这一 RM 仍需通过大型多中心队列进行验证。

相似文献

1
A novel machine learning-based radiomic model for diagnosing high bleeding risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.一种基于新型机器学习的放射组学模型,用于诊断肝硬化患者的高出血风险食管静脉曲张。
Hepatol Int. 2022 Apr;16(2):423-432. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10292-6. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Computed tomography liver stiffness measurement and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描肝脏硬度测量和磁共振成像在评估肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 14;26(18):2247-2267. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2247.
3
Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for non-invasive prediction of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.血小板计数/脾脏直径比值对肝硬化患者高危食管静脉曲张的无创预测。
Ann Hepatol. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):325-30.
4
Non-invasive ménage à trois for the prediction of high-risk varices: stepwise algorithm using lok score, liver and spleen stiffness.用于预测高危静脉曲张的非侵入性“三人行”:使用洛克评分、肝脏和脾脏硬度的逐步算法
Liver Int. 2015 Feb;35(2):317-25. doi: 10.1111/liv.12687. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
5
Transient Elastography Identifies the Risk of Esophageal Varices and Bleeding in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Liver Cirrhosis.瞬时弹性成像可识别乙型肝炎病毒相关性肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张及出血风险。
Ultrasound Q. 2018 Sep;34(3):141-147. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000373.
6
An imaging-based machine learning model outperforms clinical risk scores for prognosis of cirrhotic variceal bleeding.基于成像的机器学习模型在肝硬化静脉曲张出血预后方面优于临床风险评分。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8965-8973. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09938-w. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
7
Is transient elastography valuable for high-risk esophageal varices prediction in patients with hepatitis-B-related cirrhosis?瞬时弹性成像技术在预测乙型肝炎相关性肝硬化高危食管静脉曲张中的价值
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;27(3):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06889.x.
8
Computed tomography-based multi-organ radiomics nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.基于计算机断层扫描的多器官放射组学列线图模型预测肝硬化患者胃食管静脉曲张出血风险。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 28;30(36):4044-4056. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i36.4044.
9
Clinical-radiomics nomogram for predicting esophagogastric variceal bleeding risk noninvasively in patients with cirrhosis.临床放射组学列线图无创预测肝硬化患者胃食管静脉曲张出血风险
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 14;29(6):1076-1089. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.1076.
10
Risk assessment of first upper gastrointestinal bleeding using computerized tomoscanning in esophageal varices patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.肝硬化和门静脉高压食管静脉曲张患者首次上消化道出血的计算机断层扫描风险评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e18923. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018923.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict esophagogastric variceal rebleeding risk in HBV-related cirrhosis after endoscopic treatment: a prospective multicenter study.预测内镜治疗后乙肝相关肝硬化患者食管胃静脉曲张再出血风险的机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 20;87:103436. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103436. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for standard spleen volume prediction.用于标准脾脏体积预测的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5160-5176. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2954. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
3
Application of artificial intelligence in portal hypertension and esophagogastric varices.
人工智能在门静脉高压症和食管胃静脉曲张中的应用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 28;31(24):108508. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i24.108508.
4
Recent advances in machine learning for precision diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disorders.机器学习在食管疾病精准诊断与治疗方面的最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;31(23):105076. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i23.105076.
5
Visualizing global progress and challenges in esophagogastric variceal bleeding.可视化食管胃静脉曲张出血的全球进展与挑战。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):102020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102020.
6
AI in Hepatology: Revolutionizing the Diagnosis and Management of Liver Disease.人工智能在肝病学中的应用:革新肝病的诊断与管理
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 22;13(24):7833. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247833.
7
Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis.基于人工智能的肝硬化预后评估。
J Transl Med. 2024 Oct 14;22(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05726-2.
8
Computed tomography-based multi-organ radiomics nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.基于计算机断层扫描的多器官放射组学列线图模型预测肝硬化患者胃食管静脉曲张出血风险。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 28;30(36):4044-4056. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i36.4044.
9
Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in the Management of Esophageal Varices.基于人工智能的系统在食管静脉曲张管理中的应用
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):1012. doi: 10.3390/jpm14091012.
10
Guidelines for the Management of Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension.肝硬化门静脉高压症食管胃底静脉曲张出血的管理指南
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023 Dec 28;11(7):1565-1579. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00061. Epub 2023 Oct 17.