The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, New York, USA.
Med Phys. 2022 Jun;49(6):4099-4108. doi: 10.1002/mp.15623. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
While FLASH radiation therapy is inspiring enthusiasm to transform the field, it is neither new nor well understood with respect to the radiobiological mechanisms. As FLASH clinical trials are designed, it will be important to ensure we can deliver dose consistently and safely to every patient. Much like hyperthermia and proton therapy, FLASH is a promising new technology that will be complex to implement in the clinic and similarly will require customized credentialing for multi-institutional clinical trials. There is no doubt that FLASH seems promising, but many technologies that we take for granted in conventional radiation oncology, such as rigorous dosimetry, 3D treatment planning, volumetric image guidance, or motion management, may play a major role in defining how to use, or whether to use, FLASH radiotherapy. Given the extended time frame for patients to experience late effects, we recommend moving deliberately but cautiously forward toward clinical trials. In this paper, we review the state of quality assurance and safety systems in FLASH, identify critical pre-clinical data points that need to be defined, and suggest how lessons learned from previous technological advancements will help us close the gaps and build a successful path to evidence-driven FLASH implementation.
虽然 FLASH 辐射疗法激发了人们的热情,有望改变该领域,但就放射生物学机制而言,它既不是新的,也没有得到很好的理解。随着 FLASH 临床试验的设计,确保我们能够为每一位患者安全一致地提供剂量将非常重要。与热疗和质子疗法类似,FLASH 是一种有前途的新技术,在临床实施时将非常复杂,同样需要为多机构临床试验进行定制的认证。毫无疑问,FLASH 似乎很有前途,但我们在常规放射肿瘤学中认为理所当然的许多技术,如严格的剂量学、3D 治疗计划、容积图像引导或运动管理,可能在定义如何使用或是否使用 FLASH 放射疗法方面发挥重要作用。鉴于患者经历晚期效应的时间延长,我们建议谨慎但慎重地向前推进临床试验。在本文中,我们回顾了 FLASH 的质量保证和安全系统的现状,确定了需要定义的关键临床前数据点,并提出了从以前的技术进步中吸取的经验教训将如何帮助我们弥合差距,为循证 FLASH 实施铺平成功之路。