• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

见多识广,教学相长:评估鼻科学中公开可用的内镜视频的质量和可靠性。

See many, do one, teach many more: Assessing quality and reliability of publicly available endoscopic videos in rhinology.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Dec;12(12):1527-1534. doi: 10.1002/alr.23006. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1002/alr.23006
PMID:35366374
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of video recording is commonplace in rhinology given the increased use of endoscopes when evaluating patients in the office and the operating room and for its educational potential. This study aimed to determine the quality of publicly available endoscopic videos in rhinology.

METHODS

A video search was performed on YouTube in April 2020 and included all videos since its inception in 2005 using terms related to rhinology found in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Case Log Coding Guide. Videos which met inclusion criteria were evaluated for video metrics and quality using validated scoring systems: Video Power Index (VPI), modified Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, modified global quality score (GQS), and modified DISCERN criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 138 videos were evaluated, 114 of which were uploaded independently, and 24 videos were uploaded by an academic institution. Academic-affiliated videos have higher like ratio at 91.7 ± 7.55% compared with 86.27 ± 17.44% (p = 0.018). Academic-affiliated videos have higher JAMA benchmark scores, DISCERN criteria scores, and GQS values (1.71 ± 0.55 vs. 1.66 ± 0.49 [p = 0.66]), (3.33 ± 0.56 vs. 2.85 ± 0.65 [p < 0.001]), (4.38 ± 0.81 vs. 3.43 ± 1.01 [p < 0.001])], respectively. There was no significant difference in VPI (p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic videos are rapidly growing in prominence and remain an important part of surgical education, but overall are heterogeneous in quality and reliability, necessitating an effort to establish both video sharing regulations and objective standards of quality.

摘要

目的

由于在诊室和手术室评估患者时内窥镜的使用越来越多,以及其具有教育潜力,因此在鼻科学中使用视频记录已很常见。本研究旨在确定鼻科学中公开可用的内窥镜视频的质量。

方法

2020 年 4 月在 YouTube 上进行了视频搜索,使用美国住院医师规范化培训认证委员会(ACGME)病例记录编码指南中找到的与鼻科学相关的术语,包括自 2005 年成立以来的所有视频。符合纳入标准的视频使用经过验证的评分系统评估视频指标和质量:视频功率指数(VPI)、改良美国医学会(JAMA)基准标准、改良总体质量评分(GQS)和改良 DISCERN 标准。

结果

共评估了 138 个视频,其中 114 个独立上传,24 个由学术机构上传。与 86.27 ± 17.44%(p=0.018)相比,学术附属机构的视频点赞率更高,为 91.7 ± 7.55%。学术附属机构的视频具有更高的 JAMA 基准评分、DISCERN 标准评分和 GQS 值(1.71 ± 0.55 比 1.66 ± 0.49[p=0.66])、(3.33 ± 0.56 比 2.85 ± 0.65[p<0.001])、(4.38 ± 0.81 比 3.43 ± 1.01[p<0.001])。VPI 无显著差异(p=0.73)。

结论

内窥镜视频的知名度正在迅速提高,仍然是外科教育的重要组成部分,但总体质量和可靠性存在差异,因此需要努力建立视频共享法规和质量客观标准。

相似文献

1
See many, do one, teach many more: Assessing quality and reliability of publicly available endoscopic videos in rhinology.见多识广,教学相长:评估鼻科学中公开可用的内镜视频的质量和可靠性。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Dec;12(12):1527-1534. doi: 10.1002/alr.23006. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
3
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
4
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.评估有关眼睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育质量和可靠性。
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
An Analysis of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Videos on Glaucoma.YouTube 上青光眼相关视频的质量、可靠性和普及度分析。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 May-Jun;5(3):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
7
The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 教育视频在前庭康复中的质量、可靠性和人气:一项横断面研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1077-e1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003197.
8
Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study.基于YouTube视频的腕管综合征在线视频质量与可靠性评估研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e059239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059239.
9
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality assessment of spinal cord injury-related health information on short-form video platforms: Cross-sectional content analysis of TikTok, Kwai, and BiliBili.短视频平台上脊髓损伤相关健康信息的质量评估:对TikTok、快手和哔哩哔哩的横断面内容分析
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 2;11:20552076251374226. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374226. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluation of the Quality of Educational YouTube Videos on Endoscopic Choanal Atresia.关于后鼻孔闭锁的教育性YouTube视频质量评估
J Rhinol. 2025 Mar;32(1):36-39. doi: 10.18787/jr.2024.00037. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on tympanostomy tubes: a comprehensive analysis for patients and parents.
评估YouTube上关于鼓膜置管术视频的质量和可靠性:针对患者及家长的综合分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21963-6.
4
Intraoperative video recording in otolaryngology for surgical education: evolution and considerations.耳鼻喉科手术教学中的术中录像:演变与考虑。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jan 19;52(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00620-1.