Goldflam Katja, Crichton Ian C, Coughlin Ryan F, Bod Jessica, Agrawal Pooja, Bradby Cassandra, Tsyrulnik Alina
Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
Independent Researcher New Haven Connecticut USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10724. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10724. eCollection 2022 Apr.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual meetings became the norm in academic emergency medicine (EM) departments. This study explores the experiences of academic EM faculty within this environment.
In 2021, authors surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of EM faculty using a mixed-methods approach to explore perceptions of the virtual meeting environment. Authors reported data on a five-point Likert scale, summarized as percentages, and calculated differences using Pearson's chi-squared test, where p < 0.05 was significant. Free text responses were analyzed qualitatively.
Two-hundred-fifty-nine responses were collected, (female [55.6%], ≤40 years old, [39.8%]) of which 33.2% had children ≤7 years old. Most respondents felt the total number of virtual meetings had increased and were more likely to happen outside of regular business hours compared to in-person meetings. Most faculty preferred meetings during regular hours and liked the virtual format overall. Younger faculty respondents were more polarized in their preferences of timing of meetings and reported more pressure to accept meetings outside of regular hours. Female respondents with young children were more likely to dislike meetings outside regular hours and to have declined them. Women faculty, younger faculty, and women faculty with young children were significantly more likely to agree that women had been "more impacted by the new virtual work environment." Qualitative themes highlighting the flexibility provided by the virtual work environment and decreased commuting time, though many felt communication was limited in virtual meetings.
Academic EM faculty mostly preferred keeping meetings during regular business hours and in a virtual format. Experiences varied by age but not by gender overall. Women with young children reported greater challenges than women without. Men did not differ by parental status. The virtual format provided increased flexibility but limited communication and engagement. Academic EM departments may use this data to inform future meeting practices.
在新冠疫情期间,虚拟会议成为学术急诊医学(EM)部门的常态。本研究探讨了在这种环境下学术EM教员的经历。
2021年,作者采用混合方法对EM教员进行了横断面便利抽样调查,以探讨对虚拟会议环境的看法。作者以五点李克特量表报告数据,汇总为百分比,并使用Pearson卡方检验计算差异,p<0.05具有显著性。对自由文本回复进行定性分析。
共收集到259份回复(女性占55.6%,年龄≤40岁占39.8%),其中33.2%育有7岁及以下子女。大多数受访者认为虚拟会议的总数有所增加,与面对面会议相比,更有可能在正常工作时间之外举行。大多数教员更喜欢在正常工作时间开会,总体上喜欢虚拟形式。年轻教员受访者在会议时间偏好上更加两极分化,并报告说在正常工作时间之外接受会议的压力更大。有年幼子女的女性受访者更有可能不喜欢正常工作时间之外的会议,并拒绝参加。女性教员、年轻教员以及有年幼子女的女性教员更有可能认同女性“受新的虚拟工作环境影响更大”。定性主题强调了虚拟工作环境带来的灵活性和通勤时间的减少,不过许多人认为虚拟会议中的沟通有限。
学术EM教员大多倾向于在正常工作时间以虚拟形式举行会议。经历因年龄而异,但总体上不因性别而异。有年幼子女的女性面临的挑战比没有子女的女性更大。男性在是否有子女方面没有差异。虚拟形式提供了更大的灵活性,但沟通和参与度有限。学术EM部门可以利用这些数据为未来的会议安排提供参考。