群体间冲突中的行为建模：微观经济学方法述评。
Modelling behaviour in intergroup conflicts: a review of microeconomic approaches.
机构信息
Department of Microeconomics and Public Economics, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0135. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Abstract
Microeconomic modelling offers a powerful formal toolbox for analysing the complexities of real-world intergroup relations and conflicts. One important class of models scrutinizes individuals' valuations of different group memberships, attitudes towards members of different groups and preferences for resource distribution in group contexts. A second broad class uses game theoretical methods to study strategic interactions within and between groups of individuals in contest and in conflict. After a concise discussion of some essential peculiarities of microeconomic modelling, this review provides an overview of the pertinent literatures in economics, highlights instructive examples of central model types and points out several ways forward. This article is part of the theme issue 'Intergroup conflict across taxa'.
摘要
微观经济建模为分析现实世界中群体间关系和冲突的复杂性提供了一个强大的形式工具包。一类重要的模型研究了个体对不同群体成员身份的评价、对不同群体成员的态度以及在群体环境中对资源分配的偏好。第二类广泛的模型使用博弈论方法来研究个体在竞争和冲突中的群体内部和群体之间的策略互动。在简要讨论微观经济建模的一些基本特点之后，本文综述了经济学中相关文献，突出了中心模型类型的一些有启发性的例子，并指出了几个前进的方向。本文是主题为“跨物种种群的群体冲突”的一部分。
相似文献
1
Modelling behaviour in intergroup conflicts: a review of microeconomic approaches.群体间冲突中的行为建模：微观经济学方法述评。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0135. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Intergroup conflict: origins, dynamics and consequences across taxa.群体间冲突：跨类别的起源、动态和后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210134. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0134. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans.环境压力会增加人类对外群体的攻击和群体间的冲突。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210147. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0147. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Variation between species, populations, groups and individuals in the fitness consequences of out-group conflict.种间、种群间、群体间和个体间的外群体冲突对适合度的影响存在差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210148. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0148. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Intergroup conflict as contest and disease.作为竞争与弊病的群体间冲突
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Jan;28(1):5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
6
Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides.社会性哺乳动物的群体间冲突和集体运动中的性别偏见：雄性战士和雌性引导者。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210142. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0142. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Wins and losses in intergroup conflicts reflect energy balance in red-tailed monkeys.群体间冲突中的胜负反映了长尾猕猴的能量平衡。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210152. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0152. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Asymmetries in altruistic behavior during violent intergroup conflict.暴力群体间冲突中利他行为的不对称性。
Evol Psychol. 2013 Oct 23;11(5):973-93. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100504.
9
Are strangers just enemies you have not yet met? Group homogeneity, not intergroup relations, shapes ingroup bias in three natural groups.陌生人是否只是你尚未谋面的敌人？在三个自然群体中，群体同质性而非群体间关系塑造了内群体偏见。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210419. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0419. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behaviour.群体间冲突的持续时间和结果会影响群体内的亲和行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 22;275(1653):2787-91. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0787.
引用本文的文献
1
Prosocial preferences can escalate intergroup conflicts by countering selfish motivations to leave.亲社会偏好可以通过抵消离开的自私动机来加剧群体间的冲突。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 18;15(1):9009. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53409-9.
2
Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.关键人物催化群体间暴力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210141. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0141. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Leaders of war: modelling the evolution of conflict among heterogeneous groups.战争领袖：异质群体间冲突演变的建模。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210140. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0140. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Intergroup conflict: origins, dynamics and consequences across taxa.群体间冲突：跨类别的起源、动态和后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210134. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0134. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Evolution of warfare by resource raiding favours polymorphism in belligerence and bravery.通过资源掠夺进行战争的演变有利于好战性和勇敢的多态性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210136. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0136. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Targeted conspiratorial killing, human self-domestication and the evolution of groupishness.有针对性的阴谋杀戮、人类自我驯化与群体意识的演变
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Apr 6;3:e26. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.20. eCollection 2021.
2
Toward a computational theory of social groups: A finite set of cognitive primitives for representing any and all social groups in the context of conflict.迈向社会群体的计算理论：在冲突背景下表示任何和所有社会群体的有限认知基元集。
Behav Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;45:e97. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000583.
3
Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior.解构社会偏好中的偏见揭示了群体和非群体行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):21185-21193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918952117. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Spoils division rules shape aggression between natural groups.战利品分配规则塑造了自然群体之间的攻击性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 May;2(5):322-326. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0338-z. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups.重新审视冲突的形式和功能：群体内部和群体之间攻击和防御的神经生物学、心理学和文化机制。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e116. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002170.
6
Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups.异质群体中的集体行动问题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150016. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0016.
7
The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.人类群体间冲突与利他主义的进化相互作用：狭隘利他主义理论综述及其扩展前景
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1539.
8
The two sides of warfare: an extended model of altruistic behavior in ancestral human intergroup conflict.战争的两面：人类祖先群体间冲突中利他行为的扩展模型
Hum Nat. 2014 Sep;25(3):359-77. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9199-y.
9
A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality.群体间冲突中集体行动问题的一个解决方案，该冲突存在群体内部不平等。
Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 26;5:3526. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4526.
10
The content of our cooperation, not the color of our skin: an alliance detection system regulates categorization by coalition and race, but not sex.我们合作的内容，而非我们皮肤的颜色：一种联盟检测系统通过联盟和种族来调节分类，但不包括性别。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088534. eCollection 2014.
Zotero 插件