Pietraszewski David, Cosmides Leda, Tooby John
Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America ; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America ; Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088534. eCollection 2014.
Humans in all societies form and participate in cooperative alliances. To successfully navigate an alliance-laced world, the human mind needs to detect new coalitions and alliances as they emerge, and predict which of many potential alliance categories are currently organizing an interaction. We propose that evolution has equipped the mind with cognitive machinery that is specialized for performing these functions: an alliance detection system. In this view, racial categories do not exist because skin color is perceptually salient; they are constructed and regulated by the alliance system in environments where race predicts social alliances and divisions. Early tests using adversarial alliances showed that the mind spontaneously detects which individuals are cooperating against a common enemy, implicitly assigning people to rival alliance categories based on patterns of cooperation and competition. But is social antagonism necessary to trigger the categorization of people by alliance--that is, do we cognitively link A and B into an alliance category only because they are jointly in conflict with C and D? We report new studies demonstrating that peaceful cooperation can trigger the detection of new coalitional alliances and make race fade in relevance. Alliances did not need to be marked by team colors or other perceptually salient cues. When race did not predict the ongoing alliance structure, behavioral cues about cooperative activities up-regulated categorization by coalition and down-regulated categorization by race, sometimes eliminating it. Alliance cues that sensitively regulated categorization by coalition and race had no effect on categorization by sex, eliminating many alternative explanations for the results. The results support the hypothesis that categorizing people by their race is a reversible product of a cognitive system specialized for detecting alliance categories and regulating their use. Common enemies are not necessary to erase important social boundaries; peaceful cooperation can have the same effect.
所有社会中的人类都会形成并参与合作联盟。为了在一个充满联盟的世界中成功前行,人类的思维需要在新的联盟出现时加以察觉,并预测当前正在组织互动的众多潜在联盟类别中哪一个。我们提出,进化为思维配备了专门执行这些功能的认知机制:一个联盟检测系统。按照这种观点,种族类别并非因为肤色在感知上很突出而存在;它们是在种族能够预测社会联盟和分化的环境中,由联盟系统构建和调节的。早期使用对抗性联盟的测试表明,思维会自发地察觉哪些个体正在联合对抗共同的敌人,根据合作与竞争模式将人们隐含地归入对立的联盟类别。但是,引发人们基于联盟进行分类是否需要社会对抗呢——也就是说,我们是否仅仅因为A和B共同与C和D冲突,就从认知上将A和B联系成一个联盟类别呢?我们报告了新的研究,表明和平合作能够引发对新的联盟联盟的察觉,并使种族的相关性减弱。联盟不需要用团队颜色或其他感知上突出的线索来标记。当种族无法预测正在进行的联盟结构时,关于合作活动的行为线索会上调基于联盟的分类,下调基于种族的分类,有时甚至会消除基于种族的分类。能够灵敏调节基于联盟和种族分类的联盟线索对基于性别的分类没有影响,排除了对结果的许多其他解释。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即根据种族对人进行分类是一个专门用于检测联盟类别并调节其使用的认知系统的可逆产物。消除重要的社会界限并不一定需要共同的敌人;和平合作也能产生同样的效果。