Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1846-1865. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07180-4. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Clinical pathways for low back pain (LBP) have potential to improve clinical outcomes and health service efficiency. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence for clinical pathways for LBP and/or radicular leg pain from primary to specialised care and to describe key pathway components.
Electronic database searches (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE) from 2006 onwards were conducted with further manual and citation searching. Two independent reviewers conducted eligibility assessment, data extraction and quality appraisal. A narrative synthesis of findings is presented.
From 18,443 identified studies, 28 papers met inclusion criteria. Pathways were developed primarily to address over-burdened secondary care services in high-income countries and almost universally used interface services with a triage remit at the primary-secondary care boundary. Accordingly, evaluation of healthcare resource use and patient flow predominated, with interface services associated with enhanced service efficiency through decreased wait times and appropriate use of consultant appointments. Low quality study designs, heterogeneous outcomes and insufficient comparative data precluded definitive conclusions regarding clinical- and cost-effectiveness. Pathways demonstrated basic levels of care integration across the primary-secondary care boundary.
The limited volume of research evaluating clinical pathways for LBP/radicular leg pain and spanning primary and specialised care predominantly used interface services to ensure appropriate specialised care referrals with associated increased efficiency of care delivery. Pathways demonstrated basic levels of care integration across healthcare boundaries. Well-designed randomised controlled trials to explore the potential of clinical pathways to improve clinical outcomes, deliver cost-effective, guideline-concordant care and enhance care integration are required.
下腰痛(LBP)的临床路径有可能改善临床结果和卫生服务效率。本系统评价旨在综合 LBP 和/或神经根性腿痛从初级到专科治疗的临床路径证据,并描述关键路径组成部分。
从 2006 年开始对电子数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE)进行了检索,并进一步进行了手动和引文检索。两名独立的审查员进行了资格评估、数据提取和质量评估。呈现了研究结果的叙述性综合。
从 18443 篇确定的研究中,有 28 篇符合纳入标准。这些路径主要是为了解决高收入国家二级保健服务负担过重的问题,几乎普遍使用具有分诊权限的接口服务。因此,医疗资源利用和患者流动的评估占主导地位,接口服务通过减少等待时间和适当利用顾问预约,提高了服务效率。低质量的研究设计、结果的异质性和数据的不足,使得关于临床和成本效益的结论无法确定。路径在初级-二级保健边界上展示了基本的护理整合水平。
评估 LBP/神经根性腿痛临床路径并跨越初级和专科治疗的研究数量有限,主要使用接口服务来确保适当的专科治疗转诊,从而提高护理提供的效率。路径在医疗保健边界上展示了基本的护理整合水平。需要精心设计的随机对照试验来探索临床路径改善临床结果、提供符合成本效益的、符合指南的护理和增强护理整合的潜力。