Grossi Alessandra Agnese, Puoti Francesca, Fiaschetti Pamela, Di Ciaccio Paola, Maggiore Umberto, Cardillo Massimo
Department of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, University of Insubria, Como, Italy.
Center for Clinical Ethics, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):372-378. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac027.
Multiple barriers diminish access to kidney transplantation (KT) in immigrant compared to non-immigrant populations. It is unknown whether immigration status reduces the likelihood of KT after wait-listing despite universal healthcare coverage with uniform access to transplantation.
We retrospectively collected data of all adult waiting list (WL) registrants in Italy (2010-20) followed for 5 years until death, KT in a foreign center, deceased-donor kidney transplant (DDKT), living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) or permanent withdrawal from the WL. We calculated adjusted relative probability of DDKT, LDKT and permanent WL withdrawal in different immigrant categories using competing-risks multiple regression models.
Patients were European Union (EU)-born (n = 21 624), Eastern European-born (n = 606) and non-European-born (n = 1944). After controlling for age, sex, blood type, dialysis vintage, case-mix and sensitization status, non-European-born patients had lower LDKT rates compared to other immigrant categories: LDKT adjusted relative probability of non-European-born vs. Eastern European-born 0.51 (95% CI: 0.33-0.79; P = 0.002); of non-European-born vs. EU-Born: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.47-0.82; P = 0.001). Immigration status did not affect the rate of DDKT or permanent WL withdrawal.
Among EU WL registrants, non-European immigration background is associated with reduced likelihood of LDKT but similar likelihood of DDKT and permanent WL withdrawal. Wherever not available, new national policies should enable coverage of travel and medical fees for living-donor surgery and follow-up for non-resident donors to improve uptake of LDKT in immigrant patients, and provide KT education that is culturally competent, individually tailored and easily understandable for patients and their potential living donors.
与非移民人群相比,多种障碍使得移民获得肾脏移植(KT)的机会减少。尽管有全民医保且移植机会均等,但尚不清楚移民身份是否会降低列入等待名单后接受KT的可能性。
我们回顾性收集了意大利所有成年等待名单(WL)登记者(2010 - 20年)的数据,随访5年直至死亡、在国外中心接受KT、接受 deceased - donor 肾脏移植(DDKT)、接受 living - donor 肾脏移植(LDKT)或永久退出WL。我们使用竞争风险多元回归模型计算了不同移民类别中DDKT、LDKT和永久退出WL的调整后相对概率。
患者分别为出生于欧盟(EU)的(n = 21624)、出生于东欧的(n = 606)和非欧洲出生的(n = 1944)。在控制了年龄、性别、血型、透析时间、病例组合和致敏状态后,与其他移民类别相比,非欧洲出生的患者LDKT率较低:非欧洲出生与东欧出生相比LDKT调整后相对概率为0.51(95%CI:0.33 - 0.79;P = 0.002);非欧洲出生与欧盟出生相比:0.65(95%CI:0.47 - 0.82;P = 0.001)。移民身份不影响DDKT率或永久退出WL的比例。
在欧盟WL登记者中,非欧洲移民背景与较低的LDKT可能性相关,但DDKT和永久退出WL的可能性相似。在无法提供相关服务的地方,新的国家政策应涵盖活体供体手术的差旅费和医疗费以及对非居民供体的随访,以提高移民患者对LDKT的接受率,并提供具有文化适应性、个性化且患者及其潜在活体供体易于理解的KT教育。