Ma Qingzhou, Geng Yuehua, Li Qiang, Cheng Chongyang, Zang Rui, Guo Yashuang, Wu Haiyan, Xu Chao, Zhang Meng
Department of Plant Pathology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Mar 21;20:1456-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.016. eCollection 2022.
and , two closely related fungal species, are both economically important pathogens but have quite different target hosts (specific to plants and cross-kingdom infection, respectively). In the present study, complete circular mitochondrial genomes of the two species were sequenced and assembled, which mainly comprised the same set of 13 core protein-coding genes (PCGs), two rRNAs, and a certain number of tRNAs and unidentified open reading frames (ORFs). Comparative analyses indicated that these two fungi had significant mitogenomic collinearity and consistent mitochondrial gene arrangement, yet with vastly different mitogenome sizes, 264,948 bp and 64,620 bp, respectively. By contrast with the 17 introns containing 17 intronic ORFs (one-to-one) in the mitogenome, involved far more introns (70) and intronic ORFs (126), which was considered as the main contributing factors of their mitogenome expansion/contraction. Within the generally intron-rich gene , a total of 18 and 10 intron position classes (Pcls) were identified separately in the two mitogenomes. Moreover, 16.16% and 10.85% ratios of intra-mitogenomic repetitive regions were detected in and , respectively. Based on the combined mitochondrial gene dataset, we established a well-supported topology of phylogeny tree of 98 ascomycetes, implying that mitogenomes may act as an effective molecular marker for fungal phylogenetic reconstruction. Our results served as the first report on mitogenomes in the genus , and would have significant implications in understanding the origin, evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of this fungal lineage.
和是两种密切相关的真菌物种,它们都是具有重要经济意义的病原体,但具有截然不同的目标宿主(分别特定于植物和跨界感染)。在本研究中,对这两种物种的完整环状线粒体基因组进行了测序和组装,其主要由同一组13个核心蛋白质编码基因(PCGs)、两个rRNA以及一定数量的tRNA和未鉴定的开放阅读框(ORFs)组成。比较分析表明,这两种真菌具有显著的有丝分裂基因组共线性和一致的线粒体基因排列,但有丝分裂基因组大小差异极大,分别为264,948 bp和64,620 bp。与线粒体基因组中含有17个内含子且内含子ORF为17个(一一对应)相比,含有更多的内含子(70个)和内含子ORF(126个),这被认为是它们有丝分裂基因组扩张/收缩的主要因素。在通常富含内含子的基因中,在两个有丝分裂基因组中分别鉴定出总共18个和10个内含子位置类别(Pcls)。此外,在和中分别检测到有丝分裂基因组内重复区域的比例为16.16%和10.85%。基于合并的线粒体基因数据集,我们建立了一个支持良好的98种子囊菌系统发育树拓扑结构,这意味着有丝分裂基因组可能作为真菌系统发育重建的有效分子标记。我们的结果是关于该属有丝分裂基因组的首次报道,对理解这一真菌谱系的起源、进化和致病机制具有重要意义。