• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对女性获得围产期心理健康保健的障碍和促进因素的元审查。

Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare.

机构信息

Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University, London, UK

Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e066703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703
PMID:37474171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10360426/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy.

DESIGN

A meta-review of systematic reviews.

REVIEW METHODS

Seven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating.

RESULTS

A total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators.

CONCLUSION

The identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019142854.

摘要

未加标签

围产期心理健康(PMH)问题很常见,会对女性及其家庭产生不利影响。然而,研究表明,相当一部分有 PMH 问题的女性并未寻求治疗。

目的

综合之前关于女性寻求帮助、获得帮助和参与 PMH 护理的障碍和促进因素的系统评价结果,并为临床实践和政策提出建议。

设计

元评价系统综述。

综述方法

搜索并使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目检索策略对 7 个数据库进行了回顾。纳入了关注寻求帮助和获得 PMH 护理的女性观点的研究。使用主题综合分析法对数据进行分析。采用系统评价方法学质量评估-2 评估了综述方法。为了提高结果的有效性,进行了定性敏感性分析,以评估无论其质量评分如何,主题是否在所有综述中保持一致。

结果

共纳入 32 项综述。确定了影响女性获得 PMH 护理的广泛障碍和促进因素。这些因素映射到影响因素的多层次模型(个体、医疗保健专业人员、人际间、组织、政治和社会)和护理路径(从咨询决定到接受护理)。根据确定的障碍和促进因素,提出了支持 PMH 护理设计和实施的循证建议。

结论

确定的障碍和促进因素表明许多因素之间存在复杂的相互作用,突出了需要国际努力提高对 PMH 问题的认识,减少心理健康污名化,并提供以女性为中心、灵活的护理,由训练有素且具有文化敏感性的初级保健、产妇和精神健康专业人员提供。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019142854。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/1010d9c0c511/bmjopen-2022-066703f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/4161c6c66156/bmjopen-2022-066703f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/d4daba6a4915/bmjopen-2022-066703f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/1010d9c0c511/bmjopen-2022-066703f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/4161c6c66156/bmjopen-2022-066703f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/d4daba6a4915/bmjopen-2022-066703f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/10360426/1010d9c0c511/bmjopen-2022-066703f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare.对女性获得围产期心理健康保健的障碍和促进因素的元审查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e066703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703.
2
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
3
Conceptual frameworks of barriers and facilitators to perinatal mental healthcare: the MATRIx models.围产期心理保健的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx模型
BJPsych Open. 2023 Jul 13;9(4):e127. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.510.
4
Barriers to accessing mental health services for women with perinatal mental illness: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in the UK.英国围产期精神疾病女性获得心理健康服务的障碍:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024803.
5
Barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care in health and social care settings: a systematic review.在卫生和社会护理环境中实施围产期心理健康护理的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;8(6):521-534. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30467-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Perceptions and attitudes around perinatal mental health in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: a systematic review of qualitative data.孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦围产期心理健康的认知与态度:定性数据的系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04642-x.
8
Perceptions of barriers to accessing perinatal mental health care in midwifery: A scoping review.助产领域中获得围产期心理健康护理的障碍认知:一项范围综述。
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Facilitators and barriers to accessing mental health care services and social supports among perinatal refugee women: a qualitative systematic review protocol.围产期难民女性获取心理健康保健服务和社会支持的促进因素和障碍:一项定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Feb;20(2):674-680. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00119.
10
Why do ambulance employees (not) seek organisational help for mental health support? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol of organisational support available and barriers/facilitators to uptake.为什么救护车工作人员(不)寻求组织帮助以获得心理健康支持?一项关于组织支持的可用性以及接受障碍/促进因素的混合方法系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 10;12(10):e062775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062775.

引用本文的文献

1
Dialectical behavior therapy skills training for African American pregnant women with ACEs: a pilot study of feasibility, acceptability, and mental health barriers and attitudes.针对有不良童年经历的非裔美国孕妇的辩证行为疗法技能培训:一项关于可行性、可接受性、心理健康障碍及态度的试点研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2544407. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2544407. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
2
Implementation of singing groups for postnatal depression: experiences of participants and professional stakeholders in the SHAPER-PND randomised controlled trial.产后抑郁症歌唱小组的实施:SHAPER-PND随机对照试验中参与者和专业利益相关者的经验
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 4;5:1582517. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1582517. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
MedFTs' Role in the Recruitment and Retention of a Diverse Physician Population: A Conceptual Model.医学翻译人员在招募和留住多元化医生群体中的作用:一个概念模型
Contemp Fam Ther. 2022;44(1):88-100. doi: 10.1007/s10591-021-09627-0. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Contemplating Help-Seeking in Perinatal Psychological Distress-A Meta-Ethnography.围产期心理困扰中的求助思考——元民族志学研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105226.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care in health and social care settings: a systematic review.
An integrative review of how midwives are screening and assessing for trauma in women within perinatal services.
关于助产士如何在围产期服务中对女性进行创伤筛查和评估的综合综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327253. eCollection 2025.
4
: Barriers to Mental Healthcare Access for Women in the Perinatal Period in Rwanda.卢旺达围产期妇女获得心理保健服务的障碍
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2024 Jul 31;7(2):302-318. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v7i2.17. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
The effect of depression on antiretroviral drug non-adherence among women living with HIV in Gondar health facilities, northwest Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔医疗机构中抑郁症对感染艾滋病毒女性抗逆转录病毒药物治疗依从性的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1488183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1488183. eCollection 2025.
6
Association Between Out-of-Pocket Insurance Costs and Psychotherapy Utilization Among Commercially Insured Birthing Individuals.商业保险覆盖的分娩人群自付保险费用与心理治疗利用之间的关联
Womens Health Issues. 2025 May-Jun;35(3):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.02.003. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
7
A mixed-methods study protocol: Perinatal depression screening systems and outcomes in obstetrics clinics.一项混合方法研究方案:产科诊所的围产期抑郁症筛查系统与结果
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0319181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319181. eCollection 2025.
8
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Perinatal Mood, Anxiety, and Related Disorders: Guide de pratique 2024 du Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments pour le traitement des troubles de l'humeur, des troubles anxieux et des troubles connexes périnatals.加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络2024年围产期情绪、焦虑及相关障碍管理临床实践指南:加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络2024年围产期情绪、焦虑及相关障碍治疗实践指南
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12:7067437241303031. doi: 10.1177/07067437241303031.
9
Prevalence and treatment of perinatal anxiety: diagnostic interview study.围产期焦虑症的患病率及治疗:诊断性访谈研究
BJPsych Open. 2024 Dec 13;11(1):e5. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.823.
10
Socioeconomic deprivation and perinatal anxiety: an observational cohort study.社会经济剥夺与围产期焦虑:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):3183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20608-4.
在卫生和社会护理环境中实施围产期心理健康护理的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;8(6):521-534. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30467-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of psychological interventions to reduce post traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth and a meta-synthesis of facilitators and barriers to uptake of psychological care.对减少产后创伤后应激症状的心理干预措施的临床效果进行系统评价,以及对接受心理护理的促进因素和障碍进行元综合分析。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:678-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.092. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
COVID-19 Highlighting Inequalities in Access to Healthcare in England: A Case Study of Ethnic Minority and Migrant Women.新冠疫情凸显英国医疗保健可及性方面的不平等:以少数族裔和移民妇女为例
Fem Leg Stud. 2020;28(3):301-310. doi: 10.1007/s10691-020-09437-z. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Moving towards anti-racist praxis in medicine.迈向医学领域的反种族主义实践。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):451-453. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31543-9. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Recovery from postpartum psychosis: a systematic review and metasynthesis of women's and families' experiences.产后精神病的康复:对女性和家庭体验的系统评价和元综合分析。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020 Oct;23(5):597-612. doi: 10.1007/s00737-020-01025-z. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
8
Barriers and facilitators to GP-patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care: a systematic review.英国初级医疗中全科医生与患者就情感问题进行沟通的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 5;37(4):434-444. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa002.
9
Postpartum stress and infant outcome: A review of current literature.产后压力与婴儿结局:当前文献综述。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Feb;284:112769. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112769. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
No straight lines - young women's perceptions of their mental health and wellbeing during and after pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.无直线可循——年轻女性在怀孕中和怀孕后对其心理健康和福祉的认知:系统评价和荟萃元分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0848-5.