• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗算法能做到公平吗?三个伦理困境和一个困境。

Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Akershus, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Apr;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100445.

DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100445
PMID:35396245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8996015/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate what it takes to reconcile the idea of fairness in medical algorithms and machine learning (ML) with the broader discourse of fairness and health equality in health research.

METHOD

The methodological approach used in this paper is theoretical and ethical analysis.

RESULT

We show that the question of ensuring comprehensive ML fairness is interrelated to three quandaries and one dilemma.

DISCUSSION

As fairness in ML depends on a nexus of inherent justice and fairness concerns embedded in health research, a comprehensive conceptualisation is called for to make the notion useful.

CONCLUSION

This paper demonstrates that more analytical work is needed to conceptualise fairness in ML so it adequately reflects the complexity of justice and fairness concerns within the field of health research.

摘要

目的

展示如何在医疗算法和机器学习(ML)中协调公平理念,并将其与健康研究中更广泛的公平和平等健康话语联系起来。

方法

本文采用的方法论方法是理论和伦理分析。

结果

我们表明,确保全面的 ML 公平性的问题与三个困境和一个困境有关。

讨论

由于 ML 中的公平性取决于健康研究中内在正义和公平问题的联系,因此需要进行全面的概念化,以使这一概念变得有用。

结论

本文表明,需要进行更多的分析工作来概念化 ML 中的公平性,以便充分反映健康研究领域中正义和平等问题的复杂性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bd/8996015/4fcdb10a9a3d/bmjhci-2021-100445f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bd/8996015/f450402a9e3d/bmjhci-2021-100445f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bd/8996015/4fcdb10a9a3d/bmjhci-2021-100445f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bd/8996015/f450402a9e3d/bmjhci-2021-100445f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9bd/8996015/4fcdb10a9a3d/bmjhci-2021-100445f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma.医疗算法能做到公平吗?三个伦理困境和一个困境。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Apr;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100445.
2
Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning.医疗保健机器学习中算法公平性解决方案的伦理局限性
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e221-e223. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30065-0.
3
Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms.超越偏见与歧视:重新定义医疗保健机器学习算法中公平性的人工智能伦理原则。
AI Soc. 2023;38(2):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01455-6. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
A novel approach for assessing fairness in deployed machine learning algorithms.一种评估已部署机器学习算法公平性的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68651-w.
5
SAF: Stakeholders' Agreement on Fairness in the Practice of Machine Learning Development.SAF:机器学习开发实践公平性利益相关者协议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 24;29(4):29. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00448-y.
6
On Algorithmic Fairness in Medical Practice.医疗实践中的算法公平性问题
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2022 Jan;31(1):83-94. doi: 10.1017/S0963180121000839.
7
Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity.确保机器学习的公正性,以促进健康公平。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):866-872. doi: 10.7326/M18-1990. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
Conceptualising fairness: three pillars for medical algorithms and health equity.概念化公平:医疗算法和健康公平的三个支柱。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jan;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100459.
9
From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making.从合理预测到公正决策?在数据驱动决策背景下对算法公平性和分配正义进行概念化
Front Sociol. 2022 Oct 10;7:883999. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.883999. eCollection 2022.
10
Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review.将社会公正问题纳入医疗保健和公共卫生的经济评估中:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;198:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' understanding and attitudes toward the application of AI in pediatric healthcare: a cross-sectional survey study.家长对人工智能在儿科医疗保健中应用的理解和态度:一项横断面调查研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;13:1654482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1654482. eCollection 2025.
2
Reporting of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Risk Prediction Models Used for Precision Health: Scoping Review.用于精准健康的临床风险预测模型中公平性指标的报告:范围综述
Online J Public Health Inform. 2025 Mar 19;17:e66598. doi: 10.2196/66598.
3
Algorithmic individual fairness and healthcare: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity in essence: a call for operationalising fairness in machine learning for healthcare.公平的本质:呼吁在医疗保健机器学习中实现公平性操作化。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Apr;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100289.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
3
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.
算法个体公平性与医疗保健:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 30;8(1):ooae149. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae149. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Knowledge and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing among various categories of professionals in China: a cross-sectional study.中国不同类别专业人员对护理领域人工智能的认知与态度:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 2;12:1433252. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1433252. eCollection 2024.
5
Health equity assessment of machine learning performance (HEAL): a framework and dermatology AI model case study.机器学习性能的健康公平性评估(HEAL):一个框架及皮肤病学人工智能模型案例研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102479. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102479. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Algorithmic Individual Fairness and Healthcare: A Scoping Review.算法个体公平性与医疗保健:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 26:2024.03.25.24304853. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.25.24304853.
7
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
8
Leveraging web-based prediction calculators to set patient expectations for elective spine surgery: a qualitative study to inform implementation.利用基于网络的预测计算器为择期脊柱手术患者设定预期:一项用于提供实施信息的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 3;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02234-z.
9
Anesthesiologists' Perspective on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anaesthesia in Terms of Medical Ethics and Medical Education: A Survey Study.从医学伦理和医学教育角度看麻醉医生对人工智能在超声引导区域麻醉中应用的看法:一项调查研究
Eurasian J Med. 2023 Jun;55(2):146-151. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22254.
10
Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients.患者对医疗保健中人工智能的态度和认知:一项横断面调查
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 8;8:20552076221116772. doi: 10.1177/20552076221116772. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
4
Assessing risk, automating racism.评估风险,使种族主义自动化。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):421-422. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3873.
5
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1347-1358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259.
6
Artificial Intelligence and Black-Box Medical Decisions: Accuracy versus Explainability.人工智能与医疗决策的黑箱:准确性与可解释性
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Jan;49(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/hast.973.
7
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.高性能医学:人机智能融合。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity.确保机器学习的公正性,以促进健康公平。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):866-872. doi: 10.7326/M18-1990. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Towards theoretically robust evidence on health equity: a systematic approach to contextualising equity-relevant randomised controlled trials.迈向具有稳健理论基础的健康公平证据:使与公平相关的随机对照试验情境化的系统方法。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan;45(1):54-59. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104610. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations.以患者为中心的医疗保健获取途径:在卫生系统和人群的交叉点上构想获取途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18.