• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像测量新生儿和青少年脉搏波速度:方法学方面及其临床意义。

Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonates and Adolescents: Methodological Aspects and Their Clinical Implications.

机构信息

Clinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Oct;43(7):1631-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02894-0. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00246-022-02894-0
PMID:35396945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489561/
Abstract

Pulse wave velocity (PWV) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) lacks standardization. The aim of this study was to investigate methodological aspects of PWV measurements by CMR in neonates and adolescents. A computer phantom was created to validate the temporal resolution required for accurate PWV. Fifteen neonates and 71 adolescents underwent CMR with reference standard 3D angiography and phase-contrast flow acquisitions, and in a subset coronal overview images. Velocity and flow curves, transit time methods (time-to-foot (TTF), maximum upslope, and time-to-peak (TTP)), and baseline correction methods (no correction, automatic and manual) were investigated. In neonates, required timeframes per cardiac cycle for accurate PWV was 42 for the aortic arch and 41 for the thoracic aorta. In adolescents, corresponding values were 39 and 32. Aortic length differences by overview images and 3D angiography in adolescents were - 16-18 mm (aortic arch) and - 25-30 mm (thoracic aorta). Agreement in PWV between automatic and manual baseline correction was - 0.2 ± 0.3 m/s in neonates and 0.0 ± 0.1 m/s in adolescents. Velocity and flow-derived PWV measurements did not differ in either group (all p > 0.08). In neonates, transit time methods did not differ (all p > 0.19) but in adolescents PWV was higher for TTF (3.8 ± 0.5 m/s) and maximum upslope (3.7 ± 0.6 m/s) compared to TTP (2.7 ± 1.0 m/s; p < 0.0001). This study is a step toward standardization of PWV in neonates and adolescents using CMR. It provides required temporal resolution for phase-contrast flow acquisitions for typical heartrates in neonates and adolescents, and supports 3D angiography and time-to-foot with automatic baseline correction for accurate PWV measurements.

摘要

脉搏波速度(PWV)通过心血管磁共振(CMR)缺乏标准化。本研究旨在探讨新生儿和青少年 CMR 测量 PWV 的方法学方面。创建了一个计算机模型来验证准确测量 PWV 所需的时间分辨率。15 名新生儿和 71 名青少年接受 CMR 检查,同时进行参考标准 3D 血管造影和相位对比流量采集,并在亚组中进行冠状概述图像。测量了速度和流量曲线、渡越时间法(时间到脚(TTF)、最大上升斜率和到达峰值时间(TTP))以及基线校正方法(无校正、自动和手动)。在新生儿中,准确测量 PWV 所需的每个心动周期的时间框架为主动脉弓 42 个和胸主动脉 41 个。在青少年中,相应的值分别为 39 和 32。青少年通过概述图像和 3D 血管造影的主动脉长度差异为-16-18mm(主动脉弓)和-25-30mm(胸主动脉)。在新生儿中,自动和手动基线校正的 PWV 之间的一致性为-0.2±0.3m/s,在青少年中为 0.0±0.1m/s。在两组中,速度和流量衍生的 PWV 测量值均无差异(均 p>0.08)。在新生儿中,渡越时间法没有差异(均 p>0.19),但在青少年中,TTF(3.8±0.5m/s)和最大上升斜率(3.7±0.6m/s)的 PWV 高于 TTP(2.7±1.0m/s;p<0.0001)。本研究是朝着使用 CMR 对新生儿和青少年 PWV 标准化迈出的一步。它为新生儿和青少年典型心率的相位对比流量采集提供了所需的时间分辨率,并支持 3D 血管造影和时间到脚,自动基线校正可实现准确的 PWV 测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/874f7ab73823/246_2022_2894_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/6851166b0671/246_2022_2894_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/58cc9022ae6c/246_2022_2894_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/a2c0587fdd32/246_2022_2894_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/88ba669bdf69/246_2022_2894_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/b1fd3455a23f/246_2022_2894_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/2a73dd2db9c7/246_2022_2894_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/808992953e38/246_2022_2894_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/456a4a266eb7/246_2022_2894_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/cee43180488e/246_2022_2894_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/874f7ab73823/246_2022_2894_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/6851166b0671/246_2022_2894_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/58cc9022ae6c/246_2022_2894_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/a2c0587fdd32/246_2022_2894_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/88ba669bdf69/246_2022_2894_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/b1fd3455a23f/246_2022_2894_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/2a73dd2db9c7/246_2022_2894_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/808992953e38/246_2022_2894_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/456a4a266eb7/246_2022_2894_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/cee43180488e/246_2022_2894_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a33/9489561/874f7ab73823/246_2022_2894_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonates and Adolescents: Methodological Aspects and Their Clinical Implications.磁共振成像测量新生儿和青少年脉搏波速度:方法学方面及其临床意义。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Oct;43(7):1631-1644. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02894-0. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
Aortic length measurements for pulse wave velocity calculation: manual 2D vs automated 3D centreline extraction.用于脉搏波速度计算的主动脉长度测量:手动二维与自动三维中心线提取
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Mar 8;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0341-y.
3
Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.从 4D 流心血管磁共振评估主动脉脉搏波速度的不同方法比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Dec 12;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0584-x.
4
Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.通过相位对比磁共振成像准确测量胸主动脉脉搏波速度所需的时间分辨率以及与临床标准压平式眼压计的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 26;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0292-5.
5
Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.应用压缩感知加速高时间分辨率二维 Cine 相位对比心血管磁共振技术对颈动脉脉搏波速度进行区域性评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0499-y.
6
Quantification of aortic pulse wave velocity from a population based cohort: a fully automatic method.基于人群的主动脉脉搏波速度定量分析:一种全自动方法。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 May 13;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0530-y.
7
Simultaneous measurements of 3D wall shear stress and pulse wave velocity in the murine aortic arch.在小鼠主动脉弓中同时测量三维壁切应力和脉搏波速度。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Mar 18;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00725-4.
8
Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.布拉姆韦尔-希尔模型用于局部主动脉脉搏波速度估计:一项基于速度编码心血管磁共振和有创压力评估的验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jan 9;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-2.
9
Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study.使用 4D 流心血管磁共振测定主动脉僵硬度 - 一项基于人群的研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Jun 21;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z.
10
Estimation of aortic pulse wave transit time in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using complex wavelet cross-spectrum analysis.利用复小波互谱分析在心血管磁共振成像中估算主动脉脉搏波传播时间。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 30;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0164-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Cardiac MRI-derived Aortic Stiffness with Early Stages and Progression of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.心脏 MRI 衍生的主动脉僵硬度与射血分数保留的心力衰竭的早期阶段和进展的相关性。
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Aug;6(4):e230344. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230344.

本文引用的文献

1
Normal and reference values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based pulse wave velocity in the middle-aged general population.中年人群基于心血管磁共振的脉搏波速度的正常参考值。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Apr 19;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00739-y.
2
Group delay method for MRI aortic pulse wave velocity measurements in clinical protocols with low temporal resolution: Validation in a heterogeneous cohort.群组延迟法在临床低时间分辨率协议中测量 MRI 主动脉脉搏波速度:在异质队列中的验证。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;69:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
应用压缩感知加速高时间分辨率二维 Cine 相位对比心血管磁共振技术对颈动脉脉搏波速度进行区域性评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0499-y.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging reveals elevated aortic pulse wave velocity in obese and overweight adolescents.磁共振成像显示肥胖和超重青少年的主动脉脉搏波速度升高。
Clin Obes. 2017 Dec;7(6):360-367. doi: 10.1111/cob.12206. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Distribution of blood flow velocity in the normal aorta: Effect of age and gender.正常主动脉血流速度分布:年龄和性别影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):487-498. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25773. Epub 2017 May 26.
6
Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.通过相位对比磁共振成像准确测量胸主动脉脉搏波速度所需的时间分辨率以及与临床标准压平式眼压计的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 26;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0292-5.
7
Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in Healthy Children and Adolescents: Reference Values for the Vicorder Device and Modifying Factors.健康儿童和青少年的主动脉脉搏波速度:Vicorder设备的参考值及影响因素
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Dec;28(12):1480-8. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv048. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Review of MRI-based measurements of pulse wave velocity: a biomarker of arterial stiffness.基于磁共振成像的脉搏波速度测量综述:动脉僵硬度的生物标志物
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Apr;4(2):193-206. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.04.
9
Normal values of aortic dimensions, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study.儿童和青年成年人的主动脉尺寸、可扩张性和脉搏波速度的正常值:一项横断面研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Nov 14;14(1):77. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-77.
10
Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity measurements with phase contrast magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry.相位对比磁共振和触诊血压测量脉搏波速度的可重复性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1141-6. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9929-8. Epub 2011 Jul 31.