• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用复小波互谱分析在心血管磁共振成像中估算主动脉脉搏波传播时间。

Estimation of aortic pulse wave transit time in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using complex wavelet cross-spectrum analysis.

作者信息

Bargiotas Ioannis, Mousseaux Elie, Yu Wen-Chung, Venkatesh Bharath Ambale, Bollache Emilie, de Cesare Alain, Lima Joao A C, Redheuil Alban, Kachenoura Nadjia

机构信息

Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75013, Paris, France.

INSERM, UMR 970, PARCC, F-75015, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 30;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0164-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12968-015-0164-7
PMID:26219835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4518708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), which substantially increases with arterial stiffness and aging, is a major predictor of cardiovascular mortality. It is commonly estimated using applanation tonometry at carotid and femoral arterial sites (cfPWV). More recently, several cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies have focused on the measurement of aortic arch PWV (archPWV). Although the excellent anatomical coverage of CMR offers reliable segmental measurement of arterial length, accurate transit time (TT) determination remains a challenge. Recently, it has been demonstrated that Fourier-based methods were more robust to low temporal resolution than time-based approaches.

METHODS

We developed a wavelet-based method, which enables temporal localization of signal frequencies, to estimate TT from ascending and descending aortic CMR flow curves. This method (archPWVWU) combines the robustness of Fourier-based methods to low temporal resolution with the possibility to restrict the analysis to the reflectionless systolic upslope. We compared this method with Fourier-based (archPWVF) and time domain upslope (archPWVTU) methods in relation to linear correlations with age, cfPWV and effects of decreasing temporal resolution by factors of 2, 3 and 4. We studied 71 healthy subjects (45 ± 15 years, 29 females) who underwent CMR velocity acquisitions and cfPWV measurements.

RESULTS

Comparison with age resulted in the highest correlation for the wavelet-based method (archPWVWU:r = 0.84,p < 0.001; archPWVTU:r = 0.74,p < 0.001; archPWVF:r = 0.63,p < 0.001). Associations with cfPWV resulted in the highest correlations for upslope techniques whether based on wavelet (archPWVWU:r = 0.58,p < 0.001) or time (archPWVTU:r = 0.58,p < 0.001) approach. Furthermore, while decreasing temporal resolution by 4-fold induced only a minor decrease in correlation of both archPWVWU (r decreased from 0.84 to 0.80) and archPWVF (r decreased from 0.63 to 0.51) with age, it induced a major decrease for the archPWVTU age relationship (r decreased from 0.74 to 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

By CMR, measurement of aortic arch flow TT using systolic upslopes resulted in a better correlation with age and cfPWV, as compared to the Fourier-based approach applied on the entire cardiac cycle. Furthermore, methods based on harmonic decomposition were less affected by low temporal resolution. Since the proposed wavelet approach combines these two advantages, it might help to overcome current technical limitations related to CMR temporal resolution and evaluation of patients with highly stiff arteries.

摘要

背景

主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)随动脉僵硬度增加和年龄增长而显著升高,是心血管死亡率的主要预测指标。通常采用平板式眼压计在颈动脉和股动脉部位测量PWV(cfPWV)。最近,多项心血管磁共振(CMR)研究聚焦于主动脉弓PWV(archPWV)的测量。尽管CMR具有出色的解剖覆盖范围,能够提供可靠的动脉长度分段测量,但准确确定传输时间(TT)仍然是一项挑战。最近有研究表明,基于傅里叶的方法在低时间分辨率下比基于时间的方法更稳健。

方法

我们开发了一种基于小波的方法,该方法能够对信号频率进行时间定位,以从升主动脉和降主动脉CMR血流曲线估计TT。此方法(archPWVWU)将基于傅里叶的方法对低时间分辨率的稳健性与将分析限制在无反射收缩期上升支的可能性相结合。我们将该方法与基于傅里叶的方法(archPWVF)和时域上升支方法(archPWVTU)在与年龄、cfPWV的线性相关性以及时间分辨率降低2倍、3倍和4倍的影响方面进行了比较。我们研究了71名健康受试者(45±15岁,29名女性),他们接受了CMR速度采集和cfPWV测量。

结果

与年龄的比较显示,基于小波的方法相关性最高(archPWVWU:r = 0.84,p < 0.001;archPWVTU:r = 0.74,p < 0.001;archPWVF:r = 0.63,p < 0.001)。与cfPWV的相关性方面,无论是基于小波(archPWVWU:r = 0.58,p < 0.001)还是基于时间(archPWVTU:r = 0.58,p < 0.001)的上升支技术,相关性都最高。此外,当时间分辨率降低4倍时,archPWVWU(r从0.84降至0.80)和archPWVF(r从0.63降至0.51)与年龄的相关性仅略有下降,而archPWVTU与年龄的关系则大幅下降(r从0.74降至0.38)。

结论

通过CMR测量,与应用于整个心动周期的基于傅里叶的方法相比,使用收缩期上升支测量主动脉弓血流TT与年龄和cfPWV的相关性更好。此外,基于谐波分解的方法受低时间分辨率的影响较小。由于所提出的小波方法结合了这两个优点,它可能有助于克服当前与CMR时间分辨率相关的技术限制,并有助于评估动脉高度僵硬的患者。

相似文献

1
Estimation of aortic pulse wave transit time in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using complex wavelet cross-spectrum analysis.利用复小波互谱分析在心血管磁共振成像中估算主动脉脉搏波传播时间。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 30;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0164-7.
2
Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.从 4D 流心血管磁共振评估主动脉脉搏波速度的不同方法比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Dec 12;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0584-x.
3
Measurement of aortic arch pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison of transit time estimators and description of a new approach.心血管磁共振测量主动脉搏波速度:传输时间估算器的比较及新方法的描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;33(6):1321-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22570.
4
Differential impact of local and regional aortic stiffness on left ventricular remodeling: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.局部和区域性主动脉僵硬度对左心室重构的影响差异:一项心血管磁共振研究。
J Hypertens. 2018 Mar;36(3):552-559. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001597.
5
Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study.使用 4D 流心血管磁共振测定主动脉僵硬度 - 一项基于人群的研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Jun 21;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0461-z.
6
Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.通过相位对比磁共振成像准确测量胸主动脉脉搏波速度所需的时间分辨率以及与临床标准压平式眼压计的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 26;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0292-5.
7
Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.主动脉可扩张性和脉搏波速度估计与 Bramwell-Hill 理论模型的一致性:一项心血管磁共振研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Jan 27;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-11.
8
Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.应用压缩感知加速高时间分辨率二维 Cine 相位对比心血管磁共振技术对颈动脉脉搏波速度进行区域性评估。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0499-y.
9
Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.布拉姆韦尔-希尔模型用于局部主动脉脉搏波速度估计:一项基于速度编码心血管磁共振和有创压力评估的验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jan 9;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-2.
10
Real-time aortic pulse wave velocity measurement during exercise stress testing.运动负荷试验期间的实时主动脉脉搏波速度测量
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Oct 5;17:86. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0191-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Lipoprotein(a) and Arterial Stiffness in Young Adults with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.家族性高胆固醇血症青年成人中脂蛋白(a)与动脉僵硬度之间的关联
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 27;14(5):1611. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051611.
2
Impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic disease.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术对综合征性遗传性胸主动脉疾病患者主动脉流体动力学和生物力学的影响。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101088. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101088. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
False lumen hemodynamics and partial thrombosis in chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of MRI-based measurements of pulse wave velocity: a biomarker of arterial stiffness.基于磁共振成像的脉搏波速度测量综述:动脉僵硬度的生物标志物
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Apr;4(2):193-206. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.04.
2
Geometry is a major determinant of flow reversal in proximal aorta.几何形状是近端主动脉血流逆转的主要决定因素。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014 May 15;306(10):H1408-16. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00647.2013. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
3
Aortic biomechanics by magnetic resonance: early markers of aortic disease in Marfan syndrome regardless of aortic dilatation?
慢性降主动脉夹层中假腔的血流动力学和部分血栓形成。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5190-5200. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10513-6. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Aging: A Review by the VascAgeNet COST Action.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在动脉老化无创评估中的应用:VascAgeNet COST 行动综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e027414. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027414. Epub 2023 May 15.
5
Cardiovascular deconditioning and impact of artificial gravity during 60-day head-down bed rest-Insights from 4D flow cardiac MRI.60天头低位卧床休息期间心血管功能失调及人工重力的影响——来自4D流心脏磁共振成像的见解
Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 7;13:944587. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.944587. eCollection 2022.
6
False lumen rotational flow and aortic stiffness are associated with aortic growth rate in patients with chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.慢性降主动脉夹层患者的假腔旋转流和主动脉僵硬度与主动脉生长速率相关:4D 血流心血管磁共振研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Mar 28;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12968-022-00852-6.
7
Combining 4D Flow MRI and Complex Networks Theory to Characterize the Hemodynamic Heterogeneity in Dilated and Non-dilated Human Ascending Aortas.结合 4D Flow MRI 和复杂网络理论来描述扩张型和非扩张型人体升主动脉血流动力学的异质性。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Sep;49(9):2441-2453. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02798-9. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Leaflet fusion length is associated with aortic dilation and flow alterations in non-dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve.瓣叶融合长度与非病变性二叶式主动脉瓣主动脉扩张和血流改变相关。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9262-9272. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08016-3. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Two-Minute k-Space and Time-accelerated Aortic Four-dimensional Flow MRI: Dual-Center Study of Feasibility and Impact on Velocity and Wall Shear Stress Quantification.两分钟k空间与时间加速的主动脉四维血流磁共振成像:可行性及对速度和壁面剪应力定量影响的双中心研究
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019 Jun 27;1(2):e180008. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019180008.
10
Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.从 4D 流心血管磁共振评估主动脉脉搏波速度的不同方法比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Dec 12;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0584-x.
磁共振评估主动脉生物力学:马凡综合征中主动脉疾病的早期标志物,与主动脉扩张无关?
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;171(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.044. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Robust estimation of pulse wave transit time using group delay.使用群延迟对脉搏波传播时间进行稳健估计。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):550-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24207. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Arterial stiffness as an imaging biomarker: are all pathways equal?动脉僵硬度作为一种影像学生物标志物:所有途径都一样吗?
Hypertension. 2013 Jul;62(1):10-2. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01372. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Body fat is associated with reduced aortic stiffness until middle age.体脂与中年前的主动脉僵硬程度降低有关。
Hypertension. 2013 Jun;61(6):1322-7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01177. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow-sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination.应用欠采样 4D 流速敏感 MRI 测量主动脉脉搏波速度:与 2D 方法和算法测定的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Apr;37(4):853-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23877. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
8
Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment.布拉姆韦尔-希尔模型用于局部主动脉脉搏波速度估计:一项基于速度编码心血管磁共振和有创压力评估的验证研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jan 9;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-2.
9
Measurement of aortic arch pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison of transit time estimators and description of a new approach.心血管磁共振测量主动脉搏波速度:传输时间估算器的比较及新方法的描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;33(6):1321-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22570.
10
Automated estimation of aortic strain from steady-state free-precession and phase contrast MR images.基于稳态自由进动和相位对比磁共振图像的主动脉应变自动估算。
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr;65(4):986-93. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22678. Epub 2010 Nov 3.