• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 PCR 的新冠病毒诊断中不同采样设备对样本前处理的稳定性影响。

Pre-analytical sample stabilization by different sampling devices for PCR-based COVID-19 diagnostics.

机构信息

Diagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Diagnostic- and Research Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Diagnostic- and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

N Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 25;70:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.nbt.2022.04.001
PMID:35398581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8990442/
Abstract

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created an unprecedented requirement for diagnostic testing, challenging not only healthcare workers and laboratories, but also providers. Quantitative RT-PCR of various specimen types is considered the diagnostic gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, both in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The pre-analytical handling of patient specimens is a critical factor to ensure reliable and valid test results. Therefore, the effect of storage duration and temperature on SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number stability was examined in various commercially available specimen collection, transport and storage devices for naso/oropharyngeal swabs and saliva. The swab specimen transport and storage devices tested showed no significant alteration of viral RNA copy numbers when stored at room temperature, except for one system when stored for up to 96 h. However, at 37 °C a significant reduction of detectable RNA was found in 3 out of 4 of the swab solutions tested. It was also found that detectability of viral RNA remained unchanged in all 7 saliva devices as well as in unstabilized saliva when stored for 96 h at room temperature, but one device showed marked RNA copy number loss at 37 °C. All tested saliva collection devices inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infectivity immediately, whereas SARS-CoV-2 remained infectious in the swab transport systems examined, which are designed to be used for viral or bacterial growth in cell culture systems.

摘要

SARS-CoV-2 大流行的爆发对诊断检测提出了前所未有的要求,不仅对医护人员和实验室构成了挑战,也对提供者提出了挑战。各种标本类型的定量 RT-PCR 被认为是检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断金标准,无论是在灵敏度还是特异性方面。患者标本的预分析处理是确保可靠和有效检测结果的关键因素。因此,研究了不同市售的鼻咽拭子和唾液标本采集、运输和储存装置中储存时间和温度对 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 拷贝数稳定性的影响。当在室温下储存时,测试的拭子标本运输和储存装置中病毒 RNA 拷贝数没有明显改变,除了一个系统在储存 96 小时时。然而,在 37°C 时,在测试的 4 种拭子溶液中有 3 种发现可检测 RNA 显著减少。研究还发现,在室温下储存 96 小时时,所有 7 种唾液装置以及未稳定的唾液中,病毒 RNA 的检测能力保持不变,但有一个装置在 37°C 时显示出明显的 RNA 拷贝数损失。所有测试的唾液采集装置都立即抑制了 SARS-CoV-2 的感染性,而在拭子运输系统中 SARS-CoV-2 仍然具有传染性,这些系统旨在用于病毒或细菌在细胞培养系统中的生长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/c266ca0120f5/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/921c5f898ea4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/4330302b632c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/4928afc29e68/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/f554e024accf/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/9d57db98c2bc/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/c266ca0120f5/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/921c5f898ea4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/4330302b632c/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/4928afc29e68/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/f554e024accf/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/9d57db98c2bc/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb32/8990442/c266ca0120f5/gr6_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-analytical sample stabilization by different sampling devices for PCR-based COVID-19 diagnostics.基于 PCR 的新冠病毒诊断中不同采样设备对样本前处理的稳定性影响。
N Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 25;70:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Pre-analytical properties of different respiratory viruses for PCR-based detection: Comparative analysis of sampling devices and sample stabilization solutions.不同呼吸道病毒基于 PCR 的检测的前分析特性:采样设备和样本稳定溶液的比较分析。
N Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 25;79:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
3
Detection and Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in Three Self-Collected Specimen Types: Flocked Midturbinate Swab (MTS) in Viral Transport Media, Foam MTS, and Saliva.三种自我采集标本类型中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测和稳定性:病毒运输介质中的鼻内拭子(MTS)、泡沫 MTS 和唾液。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0103322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01033-22. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Meals and Room Temperature Storage do not Significantly Affect Feasibility of Direct RT-PCR Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Saliva.用餐和室温储存不会显著影响使用唾液进行 SARS-CoV-2 直接 RT-PCR 检测的可行性。
Clin Lab. 2022 Jun 1;68(6). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210451.
6
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Detection from Saliva Sampling and Oropharyngeal Swab.比较唾液采样与咽拭子采样检测 SARS-CoV-2 的效果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0142222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01422-22. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
7
Morning SARS-CoV-2 Testing Yields Better Detection of Infection Due to Higher Viral Loads in Saliva and Nasal Swabs upon Waking.晨起进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测,由于唾液和鼻腔拭子中病毒载量较高,可提高感染检出率。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0387322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03873-22. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
8
Rapid processing of SARS-CoV-2 containing specimens for direct RT-PCR.快速处理含 SARS-CoV-2 的标本进行直接 RT-PCR。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246867. eCollection 2021.
9
Optimization and Improvement of qPCR Detection Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva.优化和提高唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 的 qPCR 检测灵敏度。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0464022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04640-22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.比较日本 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子和唾液标本用于 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 分子检测的效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jan;27(1):126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Virus Entry Pathway Determines Sensitivity to the Antiviral Peptide TAT-I24.病毒进入途径决定了对抗病毒肽TAT-I24的敏感性。
Viruses. 2025 Mar 23;17(4):458. doi: 10.3390/v17040458.
2
Re-testing as a method of implementing external quality assessment program for COVID-19 real time PCR testing in Uganda.在乌干达,重新检测作为实施 COVID-19 实时 PCR 检测外部质量评估计划的一种方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 24;19(1):e0287272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287272. eCollection 2024.
3
Inactivation of Bacteriophage ɸ6 and SARS-CoV-2 in Antimicrobial Surface Tests.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time PCR under challenging pre-analytical conditions reveals independence of swab media and cooling chain.实时 PCR 检测在具有挑战性的分析前条件下检测 SARS-CoV-2,显示了拭子介质和冷却链的独立性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 30;11(1):13592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93028-8.
2
Evaluation of Specimen Types and Saliva Stabilization Solutions for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的样本类型及唾液稳定溶液评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01418-20.
3
Saliva is a reliable and accessible source for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
抗菌表面测试中噬菌体ɸ6和新冠病毒的灭活
Viruses. 2023 Aug 29;15(9):1833. doi: 10.3390/v15091833.
4
Glyco engineered pentameric SARS-CoV-2 IgMs show superior activities compared to IgG1 orthologues.糖基工程五聚体 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 比 IgG1 同源物具有更高的活性。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1147960. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1147960. eCollection 2023.
5
Taking a step back from testing: Preanalytical considerations in molecular infectious disease diagnostics.从检测后退一步:分子传染病诊断中的分析前考虑。
Clin Biochem. 2023 May;115:22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
唾液是检测 SARS-CoV-2 的可靠且可及的来源。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较唾液和鼻咽拭子核酸扩增检测在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):353-360. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876.
5
The Sensitivity and Costs of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用唾液与鼻咽拭子检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的敏感性和成本:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Apr;174(4):501-510. doi: 10.7326/M20-6569. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Biosafety Requirements for Autopsies of Patients with COVID-19: Example of a BSL-3 Autopsy Facility Designed for Highly Pathogenic Agents.《COVID-19 患者尸检的生物安全要求:为高致病性病原体设计的 BSL-3 尸检设施示例》
Pathobiology. 2021;88(1):37-45. doi: 10.1159/000513438. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
A Study of Policies and Guidelines for Collecting, Processing, and Storing Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patient Biospecimens for Biobanking and Research.关于收集、处理和存储2019冠状病毒病患者生物样本用于生物样本库和研究的政策与指南研究
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Dec;18(6):511-516. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0099. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.从唾液中检测 SARS-CoV-2 与门诊鼻咽拭子比较。
Viruses. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):1314. doi: 10.3390/v12111314.
9
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection.自我采集的口腔液和鼻腔拭子与临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子在检测 2019 年冠状病毒病方面具有相当的敏感性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3106-e3109. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1589.
10
Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study.基于 PCR 的检测方法以 Hock-a-loogie 唾液作为 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断标本:一项诊断有效性研究。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Dec;511:177-180. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 15.